岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (10): 3312-3322.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.1160CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.1160

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

应力和温度对花岗岩滞弹性应变恢复法柔度特性的影响研究

马春德1,弓枪1,谭观霜1,李晨阳1,周宏波1,赵俊康2   

  1. 1.中南大学 资源与安全工程学院,湖南 长沙 410083;2.紫金矿业集团股份有限公司 矿产地质勘查院,福建 厦门 361006
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-28 接受日期:2026-06-22 出版日期:2026-10-10 发布日期:2026-10-08
  • 通讯作者: 谭观霜,男,1997年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩石力学理论及工程方面的研究。E-mail: tanguangshuang@csu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:马春德,男,1976年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩石力学与采矿工程方面的研究。E-mail: cdma@csu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    湖南省自然科学基金(No.2023JJ30680)

Influence of stress and temperature on compliance characteristics of granite anelastic strain recovery method

MA Chun-de1, GONG Qiang1, TAN Guan-shuang1, LI Chen-yang1, ZHOU Hong-bo1, ZHAO Jun-kang2   

  1. 1. School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410083, China; 2. Mineral Geological Exploration Institute, Zijin Mining Group Co., Ltd., Xiamen, Fujian 361006, China
  • Received:2025-10-28 Accepted:2026-06-22 Online:2026-10-10 Published:2026-10-08
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2023JJ30680).

摘要: 为探究应力与温度对滞弹性应变恢复(anelastic strain recovery,简称ASR)法柔度特性的影响,本研究采用花岗岩进行了蠕变及蠕变后卸载试验。结果表明,在40%~50%单轴抗压强度(unconfined compressive strength,简称UCS)应力水平下,岩石以黏弹性变形为主,滞弹性应变恢复显著;而在60%~70%UCS应力水平下,岩石变形转为黏弹性与塑性变形主导,滞弹性应变恢复相对减弱。随应力水平增加,柔度比逐渐增大,两种柔度均先增大后减小。此外,温度升高使岩石滞弹性恢复应变与柔度均增大。柔度比在25~200 ℃的中低温区间随温度升高而增大,而在300~500 ℃的高温区间随温度升高而降低,这是由于不同温度对于花岗岩剪切柔度和体积柔度的影响效应不同。研究结果为ASR法中柔度比的合理选取提供了试验依据。

关键词: ASR法, 蠕变, 滞弹性恢复应变, 柔度, 柔度比

Abstract: In order to explore the influence of stress and temperature on the compliance characteristics of anelastic strain recovery (ASR) method, this study used granite specimens to carry out creep and post-creep unloading experiments. The results show that, under a stress level ranging from 40% to 50% of the uniaxial compressive strength (UCS), the rock predominantly undergoes viscoelastic deformation, with a notable recovery of anelastic strain. At stress levels between 60% and 70% UCS, the deformation of the rock is primarily characterized by a combination of viscoelastic and plastic deformation, resulting in a relatively diminished recovery of anelastic strain. As the stress level escalates, the compliance ratio gradually increases, while both types of compliance initially rise and subsequently decline. Furthermore, an elevation in temperature leads to an increase in both the recovery strain and compliance of the rock. Within the moderate to low temperature range of 25–200 °C, the compliance ratio increases with rising temperature, whereas it decreases within the high temperature range of 300–500 °C. This phenomenon arises because varying temperatures exert distinct effects on the shear. The findings of this study offer an experimental foundation for the judicious selection of the compliance in ASR method.

Key words: ASR method, creep, anelastic recovery strain, compliance, compliance ratio

中图分类号: TU 452
[1] 秦盼盼, 黄波林, 董星辰, 张鹏, 秦臻. 三峡库区木鱼包滑坡潜在慢速蠕变−快速运动转变机制及动力学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(9): 3124-3140.
[2] 翁效林, 李铉聪, 孙钰丰, 徐龙飞, WONG K K Henry. 基于非静态流动法则的非饱和时敏土弹黏塑性边界面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(6): 1989-2000.
[3] SUTANTO Daniel, LIM Aswin, SUKIWAN Octavianus Arvin, WIJAYA Martin. 真空预压过程中与预压后的软土蠕变特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(5): 1632-1644.
[4] 蔡天佐, 宋勇军, 张森, 龚泊友, 田汝栋, 刘贯飞. 温度-渗流-应力耦合作用下冻融砂岩蠕变特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(5): 1583-1596.
[5] 邓祥辉, 贾泽旭, 张巍, 王睿, 史峻昕, 任亚军. 考虑非线性的Snishihara蠕变本构模型及开发应用研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(3): 743-754.
[6] 王俊, 胡亚波, 宁建国, 党延龙, 张朝辉. 中等冲击动载下蠕变煤体加速失稳破坏试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(3): 816-827.
[7] 叶新宇, 王博, 张升, 刘蔚, 黄攀, 赵炳震. 考虑土体剪切和压缩耦合作用的节泡型锚杆蠕变模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 27-38.
[8] 赵凯, 马洪岭, 施锡林, 李银平, 杨春和, . 基于蠕变疲劳本构模型的压气蓄能盐穴长期稳定性评估[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 1-12.
[9] 张海燕, 胡新丽, 李亚博. 周期性渗流-应力耦合下滑带土的蠕变特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2189-2198.
[10] 张亮亮, 程桦, 姚直书, 王晓健, . 常规三轴压缩条件下岩石蠕变破坏时间预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2011-2022.
[11] 杨校辉, 赵子毅, 郭楠, 钱豹, 朱彦鹏, . 横观各向同性非饱和黄土蠕变特性及沉降预测[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1489-1500.
[12] 朱元广, 王璇尧, 刘滨, 刘学伟, 薛皓元, 耿志, . 层状岩石横观各向同性蠕变损伤本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1095-1108.
[13] 王学滨, 陈双印, 郑一方, 廖裴彬, . 考虑蠕变剪裂的拉格朗日元与离散元耦合方法及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 613-624.
[14] 杨楠, 邓亚虹, 刘雪娅, 慕焕东. 黄土蠕变变形特征及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3797-3810.
[15] 王贺平, 宋洋, 毛镜涵, 周健华, 李昂, 赵立财, 李庆文. 恒定法向刚度边界下加锚充填节理岩体宏细观剪切蠕变力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3823-3840.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!