岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (2): 485-496.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0645CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0645

• 压缩空气储能地下工程专题 • 上一篇    下一篇

施工缝隙对压气储能硐室钢衬受力的影响研究

张桂民1, 2,孙文卿1,朱泽凡2,苏永康1,朱旭聪1   

  1. 1. 中国矿业大学 力学与土木工程学院,江苏 徐州 221116;2. 中国矿业大学 深地工程智能建造与健康运维全国重点实验室,江苏 徐州 221116
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-20 接受日期:2025-11-17 出版日期:2026-02-10 发布日期:2026-02-04
  • 作者简介:张桂民,男,1985年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事能源地下储备相关的研究工作。E-mail: gmzhang@cumt.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 42177124);江苏省前沿技术研发计划项目(No. BF2024056)。

Influence of construction gap on the force of steel lining in compressed air storage cavern

ZHANG Gui-min1, 2, SUN Wen-qing1, ZHU Ze-fan2, SU Yong-kang1, ZHU Xu-cong1   

  1. 1. School of Mechanics and Civil Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Intelligent Construction and Healthy Operation and Maintenance of Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China
  • Received:2025-06-20 Accepted:2025-11-17 Online:2026-02-10 Published:2026-02-04
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42177124) and the Frontier Technologies R&D Program of Jiangsu (BF2024056).

摘要: 由于混凝土干缩不可避免,压气储能人工硐室钢衬与混凝土衬砌之间会产生施工缝隙,给人工硐室的稳定性和密封性带来了巨大风险。为研究施工缝隙对压气储能人工硐室钢衬受力的影响,提出了通过等效表征参数将混凝土衬砌-围岩双层圆筒模型简化为等效单圆筒模型的分析方法,建立了可表征缝隙闭合前后两阶段钢衬受力特征的解析模型,该模型经数值模拟验证有效。基于该等效理论模型开展了不同气压、围岩弹性模量、围岩黏聚力、围岩内摩擦角及埋深等参数的敏感性分析,得到了不同参数条件下施工缝隙闭合前后钢衬受力的解析解及预环向应力占比。结果表明:缝隙宽度是影响钢衬预应力的关键因素,其值越大,注气缝隙闭合后钢衬所受环向应力及预环向应力占比越大;气压、围岩弹性模量、围岩黏聚力和储气库埋深等对压气储能储气库钢衬受力状况影响较大,而围岩内摩擦角对钢衬受力影响较小。在施工中需严格控制缝隙宽度,并在选址时优先考虑高围岩弹性模量、高围岩黏聚力及埋深较大的场址,保障储气上限在允许范围内,以从基础上保障储气库的长期运行安全。

关键词: 压气储能, 内衬硐室, 施工缝隙, 受力分析, 数值模拟

Abstract: Due to the inevitable dry shrinkage of concrete, there will be construction gaps between the steel lining and concrete lining of the compressed gas energy storage artificial chamber, which brings great risks to the stability and tightness of the artificial chamber. In order to study the influence of construction gaps on the force of the steel lining of the compressed gas energy storage artificial chamber, a theoretical analysis method was proposed to simplify the concrete lining-surrounding rock double-layer cylinder model into a single-cylinder model with equivalent characterization parameters. An analytical model is developed to characterize the stress distribution in steel linings before and after gap closure. Its effectiveness is verified by numerical simulation. Based on the equivalent theoretical model, the sensitivity analysis of different parameters such as air pressure, elastic modulus of surrounding rock, cohesion of surrounding rock, friction angle of surrounding rock and burial depth is carried out. Analytical solutions for the stress in the steel lining under varying parameter conditions were obtained for both before and after the closure of the construction gap. The hoop-prestress ratio in the steel lining under various parameter settings was determined prior to the closure of the construction gap. The results indicate that the width of the construction gap is the key factor influencing the steel lining’s prestress. A larger gap leads to a greater proportion of hoop prestress and a higher hoop stress after the gap closes during gas injection. Furthermore, the internal air pressure, the elastic modulus of the surrounding rock, its cohesion, and the burial depth of the cavern significantly influence the mechanical response of the steel lining. By contrast, the friction angle of the surrounding rock exerts only a minor effect. During construction, the gap width must be strictly controlled. Furthermore, priority should be given to sites exhibiting a high elastic modulus of the surrounding rock, high rock cohesion, and greater burial depth during the site selection phase. The maximum gas storage pressure must be maintained within the permissible limit. Together, these measures underpin the gas storage facility’s long-term operational safety.

Key words: compressed air energy storage, lined rock caverns, construction gap, force analysis, numerical simulation

中图分类号: TU 93
[1] 王志良, 肖智桓, 申林方, 李邵军. 基于物理信息神经网络岩石裂隙渗流传热耦合作用机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 703-716.
[2] 黄浚鸣, 赵向阳, 马洪岭, 王磊, 张佳敏. 盐穴压缩空气储能耦合沉渣储热的综合利用可行性分析研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 373-382.
[3] 谈云志, 郭金辉, 吴克宇, 明华军, 王冲, 吴军. 恒刚度约束膨胀仪的研制与膨润土试验应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 402-412.
[4] 孙志亮, 邵敏, 王叶晨梓, 刘忠, 任伟中, 柏巍, 李朋, . 管道破损诱发地面沉降细观模拟与影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 507-518.
[5] 付强, 杨科, 刘钦节, 宋涛涛, 吴犇牛, 于鹏, . 交变荷载下围岩−衬砌组合结构界面强度特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 40-52.
[6] 谈云志, 吴克宇, 明华军, 孙德安, . 团粒膨润土振动密实性与恒刚度约束膨胀行为[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2399-2408.
[7] 张奇, 王驹, 刘江峰, 曹胜飞, 谢敬礼, 成建峰, . 热-水-力多场耦合下高放废物处置库核心处置单元间距设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2626-2638.
[8] 朱先祥, 张琦, 马俊鹏, 王永军, 孟凡贞, . 浆−水置换效应下含水砂层渗透注浆扩散机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1957-1966.
[9] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[10] 杨明云, 陈川, 赖莹, 陈云敏. 串联锚在黏土中的三向受荷承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 582-590.
[11] 张寻龙, 曹成勇, 陈湘生, . 土−岩复合地层超深圆形竖井开挖变形特性案例研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(12): 3924-3933.
[12] 刘少华, 夏才初, 徐英俊, 徐晨, . 高内气压作用下岩石破裂特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3431-3440.
[13] 张凌博, 孙宜松, 程星磊, 郭群录, 赵川, 刘京红. 基于损伤能量耗散的三维土体切削破坏面表征方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3626-3636.
[14] 张昕晔, 刘志伟, 翁效林, 李铉聪, 赵建崇, 刘小光. 上砂下黏复合地层隧道开挖面稳定性及破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3637-3648.
[15] 吴迪, 陈嵘, 孔纲强, 牛庚, 缪玉松, 王振兴. 冷-热循环温度下桥梁能量排桩热-力响应特性现场试验与数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3649-3660.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!