岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (4): 1147-1159.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0375CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0375

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

循环荷载作用下螺旋锚桩动力响应特性研究

张昕1,张茹梦1,刘晨1, 2,刘思宇1,郭博文1   

  1. 1.华北水利水电大学 地球科学与工程学院,河南 郑州 450046;2.中国电建集团河南省电力勘测设计院有限公司,河南 郑州 450007
  • 收稿日期:2025-04-10 接受日期:2025-06-23 出版日期:2026-04-13 发布日期:2026-04-14
  • 通讯作者: 刘晨,男,1998年生,硕士,主要从事风电基础土体相关试验研究。E-mail: 201600107@stu.ncwu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:张昕,女,1977年生,博士,教授,主要从事土力学试验及理论研究方面的工作。E-mail: zhangxin@ncwu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(No.2019YFC1509704);国家自然科学基金(No.U1704243)。

Dynamic response characteristics of helical anchor piles under cyclic loading

ZHANG Xin1, ZHANG Ru-meng1, LIU Chen1, 2, LIU Si-yu1, GUO Bo-wen1   

  1. 1.College of Geosciences and Engineering, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou, Henan 450046,China; 2.PowerChina Henan Electric Power Survey & Design Institute Co., Ltd., Zhengzhou, Henan 450007, China)
  • Received:2025-04-10 Accepted:2025-06-23 Online:2026-04-13 Published:2026-04-14
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R & D Program (2019YFC1509704) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1704243).

摘要: 采用自制的循环加载系统,通过模型试验探究了水平循环荷载作用下螺旋锚桩基础的承载性能以及土体变形的各因素影响规律。结合粒子图像测速(particle image velocimetry,简称PIV)技术分析桩周土体的变形场,揭示了不同影响因素作用下桩周土体的变形机制。结果表明:(1)循环荷载幅值和频率对循环荷载作用下螺旋锚桩的承载特性有显著影响,且相比原始静荷载作用情况,密砂中循环后施加静载作用下锚桩的承载性能均呈现出降低趋势。(2)滞回曲线由初始阶段的未闭合状态逐渐转变为闭合状态,同时整体响应模式表现出明显的正向偏移趋势。在相同循环周期下,滞回曲线面积随幅值的增大而增大,随频率的增大而减小。(3)根据水平累积位移规律提出了锚桩水平循环累积位移预测模型,且预测效果较好。(4)埋深比、密实度、循环荷载幅值、频率和周期对桩周土体变形有重要影响,桩前被动区位移场受幅值影响最为明显,桩后主动区砂土位移受密实度影响较大。砂土内部剪切场通常关于锚桩轴线平行对称,且剪切强度与循环荷载幅值和次数呈正相关,与循环荷载频率呈负相关。

关键词: 水平循环荷载, 螺旋锚桩, 模型试验, 粒子图像测速技术

Abstract: Using a self-developed cyclic loading system, the model tests were conducted to investigate the bearing performance of helical anchor piles under horizontal cyclic loading and the influencing factors of soil deformation. Combined with the particle image velocimetry (PIV) technology, the deformation field of the soil around the pile was analyzed, revealing the deformation mechanisms of the surrounding soil under different influencing factors. The results show that: (1) The amplitude and frequency of cyclic loading significantly influence the bearing behavior of helical anchor piles under cyclic loading. Compared to the original static loading scenario, the bearing performance of anchor piles in dense sand exhibits a decreasing trend when subjected to static loading after cyclic loading. (2) The hysteresis loop evolves from an open to a progressively closed shape, with a clear positive offset in the overall response. Under the same cyclic period, the hysteresis loop area increases with amplitude and decreases with frequency. (3) A predictive model for horizontal cyclic cumulative displacement of anchor piles was proposed based on the law of horizontal cumulative displacement, demonstrating satisfactory predictive performance. (4) The embedment ratio, relative density, amplitude, frequency and period of cyclic load have important effects on soil deformation around the pile. The passive displacement field in front of the pile is most sensitive to the loading amplitude, while sand displacement behind the pile is more sensitive to relative density. The shear field in sand is usually parallel and symmetrical with the axis of anchor pile, and the shear strength is positively correlated with the amplitude and frequency of cyclic load, and negatively correlated with the frequency of cyclic load.

Key words: horizontal cyclic loading, helical anchor pile, model test, particle image velocimetry technology

中图分类号: TU 470
[1] 潘泓, 黄才穆, 骆冠勇, 彭斯格, 刘荣照, 曹洪. 富水复合砂层突涌破坏行为及孔压响应特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1171-1182.
[2] 刘红帅, 丁泊文, 宋东松, 李羿, 王永志. 柔性叠层剪切箱在干砂场地离心试验中的边界效应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(4): 1219-1228.
[3] 杨俊鹏, 段晓沛, 张倩, 李博文, 汪益敏. 降雨条件下加筋改良软岩残积土排水性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(3): 882-892.
[4] 曹校勇, 刘瑞辉, 李建斐, 叶欣欣, 耿珺洋, 谭海星. 中硬岩地层人工地下储气硐室衬砌结构密封体系及模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 426-436.
[5] 陈树理, 郭伟, 任宇晓, 陈伟. 软土夹层地基上的互锁式L型沉箱稳定性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 49-60.
[6] 吴金标, 曾柳祁, 江益辉, 槐荣国, 曾程. 不同饱和度砂土中浅埋管道上拔抗力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 209-218.
[7] 贾宝新, 袁庆雷. 注浆影响下隧道渗流场及最小覆土厚度修正研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 255-266.
[8] 来志强, 白盛元, 陈林, 邹维列, 徐书岭, 赵连军, . 环式管袋堆场蓄淤脱水特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2805-2815.
[9] 黄大维, 卢文剑, 罗文俊, 余珏, . 盾构隧道同步注浆对砂土地层竖向位移与周围土压力影响试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(9): 2837-2846.
[10] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[11] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[12] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[13] 刘红帅, 杨健生, 宋东松, 孙强强, . 近场脉冲和非脉冲地震动作用下干砂场地响应的离心振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[14] 石湛, 章铁军, 李美香, 陶司记, 伯音, 李云波, . 泥水平衡盾构仓内水平冻结温度场的模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1534-1544.
[15] 柴红涛, 文松霖, . 组合荷载作用下桩基承载力屈服包络线特性离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1556-1562.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!