岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (7): 2261-2272.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0601CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0601

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

跨越式下伏溶洞排桩桩端极限承载力试验及简化计算方法研究

雷勇1,刘政烨1,曹振2,胡伟1   

  1. 1.湖南科技大学 土木工程学院,湖南 湘潭 411201;2.湖北交投京珠高速公路运营管理有限公司,湖北 武汉 430090
  • 收稿日期:2025-06-29 接受日期:2025-09-16 出版日期:2026-07-13 发布日期:2026-07-08
  • 作者简介:雷勇,男,1983年生,博士,教授,主要从事桩基础及特殊土地基处理方面教学与研究工作。E-mail: leiyonghnu@163.com。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No.51878270,No.52178332)

Experimental study and simplified calculation method for the ultimate end bearing capacity of pile row over underlying karst caves

LEI Yong1, LIU Zheng-ye1, CAO Zhen2, HU Wei1   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, Hunan 411201, China; 2. Hubei Jiaotou Jingzhu Expressway Operation Management Co., Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei, 430090, China
  • Received:2025-06-29 Accepted:2025-09-16 Online:2026-07-13 Published:2026-07-08
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51878270, 52178332).

摘要:

为探究跨越式下伏溶洞排桩桩端岩层的承载机制和破坏模式,进行了跨越式下伏溶洞排桩室内模型试验,得到了不同排桩桩端岩层的极限承载力和破坏模式。基于试验现象和已有研究,提出了跨越式下伏溶洞排桩破坏模式。采用极限平衡法提出了单桩桩端岩层极限承载力简化计算方法,并结合试验提出了跨越式下伏溶洞单排双桩、三桩、四桩桩端岩层极限承载力计算方法。计算结果与试验值吻合良好,验证了方法的合理性。分析了顶板厚度h和荷载偏移距离e对跨越式下伏溶洞排桩承载力折减系数的影响。研究表明:(1)跨越式下伏溶洞排桩基础随着顶板厚度、荷载偏移距离、桩间距变化有4种破坏模式:溶洞顶板的冲切破坏、溶洞顶板的复合冲切破坏、荷载偏移冲切破坏、岩石地基的整体剪切破坏;(2)偏移距离较小(1d、2dd为直径)、顶板厚度较薄时,承载力折减系数随顶板厚度大致呈线性增长,且达到一定厚度时,变化规律与偏移距离e3d时的变化规律基本一致;(3)跨越式下伏溶洞单排三桩和四桩极限承载力在顶板厚度h=4.3d基本已经接近完整基岩极限承载力,当顶板厚度h4.3d时单排三桩和四桩的极限承载力与荷载位置无关,基桩桩端岩体均发生整体剪切破坏。

关键词: 下伏溶洞, 排桩, 极限平衡, 极限承载力, 试验研究, 破坏模式

Abstract:

To explore the bearing mechanism and failure mode of the rock stratum at the end of pile row crossing over underlying karst caves, laboratory model tests of pile row crossing an underlying karst cave were carried out. The ultimate bearing capacity and failure modes of the rock layer at the pile end were obtained for various pile row configurations. Based on the test phenomena and existing research, the failure modes of pile row overlying an underlying karst cave were proposed. A simplified method for calculating the ultimate bearing capacity of the rock layer beneath a single pile toe was developed using the limit equilibrium method. Furthermore, incorporating the test results, calculation methods were proposed for determining the ultimate bearing capacity of the rock layer beneath the toes of double-pile, triple-pile, and quadruple-pile rows overlying an underlying karst cave. The calculated results agreed well with the experimental values, validating the rationality of the proposed methods. Finally, the influences of roof thickness h and load eccentricity e on the bearing capacity reduction factor for pile row overlying an underlying karst cave were analyzed. Findings reveals that:1) Pile row foundations superimposed on underlying karst caves demonstrate four distinct failure modes, contingent upon the roof thickness, load eccentricity distance, and pile spacing. These modes encompass punching failure of the cave roof, composite punching failure involving the cave roof, eccentric load-induced punching failure, and general shear failure of the rock foundation. 2) When the eccentricity distance is small (1d, 2d, where d denotes diameter) and the roof thickness is thin, the bearing capacity reduction factor increases approximately linearly with roof thickness. Upon reaching a specific thickness, the variation trend becomes essentially consistent with that observed when the eccentricity distance is e3d. 3) The ultimate bearing capacity of triple-pile and quadruple-pile row overlying an underlying karst cave approximates that of intact bedrock when the roof thickness h= 4.3d. When h 4.3d, the ultimate bearing capacity of triple-pile and quadruple-pile rows becomes independent of the load position, and the rock mass beneath the pile toes consistently undergoes overall shear failure.

Key words: underlying karst cave, pile row, limit equilibrium, ultimate bearing capacity, experimental study, failure mode

中图分类号: TU 473
[1] 袁坤. 预应力钢锚管-锚索组合结构承载力及失效机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(7): 2324-2336.
[2] 蒋亚龙, 周亚风, 徐彭楚璇, 张旗, 邱思宝. 变温−水冷循环作用下极硬花岗岩力学损伤特性及贯入性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(3): 856-868.
[3] 成栋, 朱彦鹏, 杨校辉, 张兴旺, 张育恺. 桩间水平土拱作用下滑坡推力的分配机制及简化计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(3): 1041-1055.
[4] 曹校勇, 关少钰, 叶欣欣. 压缩空气储能电站地下内衬储气洞室群上覆岩体稳定性分析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(2): 530-538.
[5] 吴金标, 曾柳祁, 江益辉, 槐荣国, 曾程. 不同饱和度砂土中浅埋管道上拔抗力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 209-218.
[6] 徐杰, 张振光, 李海祥. 考虑空间土拱效应的非饱和地层圆形基坑围护结构侧向土压力计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 245-254.
[7] 刘健, 夏勇, 江权, 陈涛, 贺维国, 范国刚, 熊先涛, 郑虹, . 强烈构造区硬梁包水电站地下洞室群围岩变形破坏特征与泸定地震响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2265-2280.
[8] 储超群, 包兴佳, 毛明发, 吴顺川, 崔贺佳, . 深地灰岩三轴压缩声发射特征及破坏形式试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2049-2061.
[9] 江沂键, 李焕焕, 朱大勇, 凌道盛, . 考虑推力线位置的边坡线性规划模型与极限平衡上下限解[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1745-1754.
[10] 杨柏, 覃超, 张银海, 王威, 肖世国, . 下伏溶洞的高嵌岩比基桩承载特性模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1839-1850.
[11] 汪昕, 幸安康, 曾子强, 姜祎, 徐建宇, 王晓南, 刘造保, . 层理铁矿石剪切力学性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1039-1048.
[12] 杨柳, 杨铎, 何满潮, . 基于纳米划痕的陆相页岩纹层界面过渡区分布范围定量研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 353-367.
[13] 兰斌鹏, 王延平, 王卫国, 王义军, 赵跃, . 拉桩支护结构变形及工作机制试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 551-562.
[14] 吴迪, 陈嵘, 孔纲强, 牛庚, 缪玉松, 王振兴. 冷-热循环温度下桥梁能量排桩热-力响应特性现场试验与数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3649-3660.
[15] 邓东平, 徐润冬, 彭一航, 文莎莎. 强度空间非均质性与各向异性特征下边坡稳定性极限平衡滑面应力法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 55-72.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!