岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (1): 295-304.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.2170

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

黄土塬地震动响应特征分析

夏坤,董林,蒲小武,李璐   

  1. 中国地震局兰州地震研究所 中国地震局黄土地震工程重点实验室,甘肃 兰州 730000
  • 收稿日期:2018-11-29 修回日期:2019-04-28 出版日期:2020-01-13 发布日期:2020-01-05
  • 作者简介:夏坤,女,1985年生,博士,副研究员,硕士生导师,主要从事防震减灾等方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No.51608496,No.51708525)

Earthquake response characteristics of loess tableland

XIA Kun, DONG Lin, PU Xiao-wu, LI Lu   

  1. Key Laboratory of Loess Earthquake Engineering, Lanzhou Institute of Seismology, China Earthquake Administration, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China
  • Received:2018-11-29 Revised:2019-04-28 Online:2020-01-13 Published:2020-01-05
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51608496, 51708525).

摘要: 2008年汶川Ms8.0级强烈地震对远离震中的黄土塬地区造成了较为严重的破坏,局部场地的震害和地震动放大效应显著。以典型黄土塬场地为对象,应用地形台阵流动观测和有限元计算方法,系统开展强震动作用下黄土塬边坡场地动力响应特征研究;应用大型振动台模拟试验和数值计算方法,重点探讨黄土塬平台场地在汶川地震作用下地表加速度响应随覆盖层厚度、地震动强度的变化规律以及对建筑结构的潜在影响。结果表明:黄土塬边坡顶部存在低频但较高放大系数的现象,可能与斜坡高差与入射波波长之比密切相关;大角度(60°~70°)黄土塬边坡对地震动的放大效应十分显著,坡顶加速度峰值(PGA)放大可达2倍,反应谱卓越周期放大可达5倍;较厚黄土塬平台场地加速度放大可达2倍以上,地震烈度增加1度,对于场地上固有周期0.7~2.0 s和周期大于3.0 s的建筑物地震反应将显著增加。

关键词: 黄土塬, 强震动观测, 振动台试验, 数值模拟, 动力响应, 放大效应

Abstract: The 2008 Ms8.0 Wenchuan earthquake had caused serious damage to structures in loess tableland region far away from the epicentre, the earthquake damage and the amplification effects of ground motion on local sites were significant. Using the typical loess tableland as the object of investigation, the dynamic response characteristics of loess tableland slope under the action of strong vibration were systematically studied by applying mobile ground motion observation arrays and numerical analysis. Based on large-scale shaking table test and numerical simulation, the change rules of surface acceleration responses of loess tableland with different thicknesses under different actions of Wenchuan earthquake were analyzed, and the potential effects on the earthquake damage were studied. The results show that: 1) The phenomenon of low predominant frequency corresponding to high peak ground acceleration (PGA) amplification at the top of loess tableland slope may be related to the ratio of slope height difference to incident wave length. 2) The loess tableland with a slope gradient ranging from 60o-70o has the most significant amplification effects on ground motion. The PGA on top of slope can be amplified by 2 times, the predominant period can be increased by 5 times. 3) The amplification effects on ground motion are predominant for thick loess tableland, PGA horizontal amplification coefficient potentially subject to an increase by 2 times and seismic intensity by 1 degree. 4) Along with the increase of loess thickness, the predominant period of response spectrum increases, so that buildings with natural period ranging from 0.7 to 2.0 seconds or greater than 3 seconds will undergo obvious horizontal amplification effects.

Key words: loess tableland, ground motion observation, shaking table test, numerical simulation, dynamic response, amplification effect

中图分类号: P 315.9
[1] 孙志亮, 邵敏, 王叶晨梓, 刘忠, 任伟中, 柏巍, 李朋, . 管道破损诱发地面沉降细观模拟与影响因素分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 507-518.
[2] 张奇, 王驹, 刘江峰, 曹胜飞, 谢敬礼, 成建峰, . 热-水-力多场耦合下高放废物处置库核心处置单元间距设计研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2626-2638.
[3] 李小军, 张誉潇, 荣棉水, 倪萍禾. 场地土层速度结构的贝叶斯反演方法及其应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2237-2254.
[4] 梁庆国, 李景, 张崇辉, 刘彤彤, 孙志涛, . 基底均匀膨胀作用下黄土−泥岩复合地层隧道衬砌力学响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1811-1824.
[5] 朱先祥, 张琦, 马俊鹏, 王永军, 孟凡贞, . 浆−水置换效应下含水砂层渗透注浆扩散机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1957-1966.
[6] 可文海, 杨文海, 李源, 吴磊, . SH波作用下斜坡地形中桩基的动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1545-1544.
[7] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[8] 杨艳霜, 闫磊, 张占荣, 刘永莉, 崔臻, 彭剑承, 亢兆鹏, . 基于三相孔隙介质模型的地震动传播特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1109-1121.
[9] 周文强, 蒋良潍, 罗强, 肖卓琦, 罗義錬, 魏明, . 锚杆框架梁柔性外锚头减震性能振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1163-1173.
[10] 杨明云, 陈川, 赖莹, 陈云敏. 串联锚在黏土中的三向受荷承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 582-590.
[11] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[12] 张凌博, 孙宜松, 程星磊, 郭群录, 赵川, 刘京红. 基于损伤能量耗散的三维土体切削破坏面表征方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3626-3636.
[13] 张昕晔, 刘志伟, 翁效林, 李铉聪, 赵建崇, 刘小光. 上砂下黏复合地层隧道开挖面稳定性及破坏模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3637-3648.
[14] 吴迪, 陈嵘, 孔纲强, 牛庚, 缪玉松, 王振兴. 冷-热循环温度下桥梁能量排桩热-力响应特性现场试验与数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3649-3660.
[15] 蔡晓光, 徐洪路, 王海云, 李思汉, 李莹, .

土工格栅加筋土挡墙水平地震系数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3033-3044.

Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!