岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5): 1277-1288.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1298

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

盾构扩挖地铁车站结构地震反应特性振动台试验

安军海1,陶连金2,蒋录珍1   

  1. 1. 河北科技大学 建筑工程学院,河北 石家庄 050018; 2. 北京工业大学 城市与工程安全减灾教育部重点实验室,北京 100124
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-11 修回日期:2021-12-24 出版日期:2022-05-11 发布日期:2022-05-02
  • 作者简介:安军海,男,1987年生,博士,主要从事地铁地下结构抗震方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    河北省自然科学基金资助项目(No. E2019208150);国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 41877218);河北科技大学博士科研启动基金资助项目(No. 1181331)

A shaking table-based experimental study on seismic response of a shield- enlarge-dig type subway station structure

AN Jun-hai1, TAO Lian-jin2, JIANG Lu-zhen1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Hebei University of Science and Technology, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050018, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing University of Technology, Beijing, 100124, China
  • Received:2021-08-11 Revised:2021-12-24 Online:2022-05-11 Published:2022-05-02
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Hebei Province, China (E2019208150), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41877218) and PhD Research Startup Foundation of Hebei University of Science and Technology (1181331).

摘要: 开展了近远场地震动作用下盾构扩挖地铁车站结构的振动台试验,分析了砂土模型地基的水平位移、地表变形、加速度、土压力反应及模型结构的加速度、应变等。结果表明:模型地基-结构体系的地震响应对中低频成分发育的地震波反应更为强烈;强震作用下地铁车站结构具有明显的空间效应,地下结构的存在将会改变模型地基表面变形的分布模式。小震时模型结构中柱的加速度反应自下而上逐渐增加,而大震时其反应规律变成先增大后减小;车站结构中板的加速度反应最大、底板次之、顶板最小;小震时,同等深度处模型结构的加速度反应与模型地基土的加速度反应大小相当,侧墙的动土压力自下而上逐渐增大;大震时,模型结构的加速度反应明显大于同深度处模型地基土的加速度反应,动土压力的最大值发生在扩挖隧道的拱肩和中间部位。基于震后模型结构的宏观现象和拉应变幅值,给出了砂土地基中盾构扩挖车站结构的地震损伤演化机制。

关键词: 振动台试验, 盾构法车站, 地震响应, 近远场地震动

Abstract: A shaking table experiment was conducted on a shield-enlarge-dig type subway station structure in sandy ground subjected to the near field earthquake and the far field earthquake. The horizontal displacement, surface deformation, acceleration, earth pressure response of the model ground and the acceleration and strain of the model structure of sandy soil are analyzed. The measured data substantiate that, the seismic response of soil-structure interaction system is more intense to the ground motion with low-and medium frequency. The subway station structure subjected to strong earthquake motions has obvious spatial effect, and the existence of underground structure will result in a change in the deformation distribution mode of ground surface. The acceleration response of columns of the model structure increases gradually from bottom to top as result of a low-intensity earthquake, while for the high- intensity earthquake, the acceleration response presents a law of increasing first and then decreasing. The acceleration response of the top plate is the biggest, followed by middle plate and bottom plate is the smallest under seismic action. And in addition to this, the acceleration response of the model structure is roughly equal to that of the model soil, and the dynamic earth pressure of the side wall increases gradually from bottom to top as result of the low-intensity earthquake; while for the high-intensity earthquake, the acceleration response of the model structure significantly surpasses that of the model soil, and the maximum value of earth pressure occurs at the arch shoulder and the middle part of the expanded tunnel. The earthquake damage mechanism of the shield-enlarge-dig type subway station structure is given based on the macroscopic phenomena of model structure after shock and the stretching strain amplitude under different ground motions.

Key words: shaking table test, shield-enlarge-dig type subway station, seismic response, near and far field earthquake

中图分类号: TU 470
[1] 刘健, 夏勇, 江权, 陈涛, 贺维国, 范国刚, 熊先涛, 郑虹, . 强烈构造区硬梁包水电站地下洞室群围岩变形破坏特征与泸定地震响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2265-2280.
[2] 杨景泉, 郑长杰, 丁选明, . 竖向入射P波激励下饱和土中管桩地震响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1477-1488.
[3] 周文强, 蒋良潍, 罗强, 肖卓琦, 罗義錬, 魏明, . 锚杆框架梁柔性外锚头减震性能振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1163-1173.
[4] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[5] 蔡晓光, 徐洪路, 王海云, 李思汉, 李莹, .

土工格栅加筋土挡墙水平地震系数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3033-3044.

[6] 周桓竹, 刘圣安, 李斌, 陈炜昀, 苏雷, 郑俊杰, 郑烨炜, . 穿越变化地层的沉管隧道接头地震响应的解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 289-298.
[7] 杨耀辉, 辛公锋, 陈育民, 李召峰, . 排水桩-网复合地基处置可液化路堤地基的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 178-186.
[8] 马建勋, MOHAMMED El Hoseny, 庞盼望, 李文枭, 闫洪祥. 考虑土−结构相互作用的地下室层对高层建筑地震反应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2808-2822.
[9] 谢周州, 赵炼恒, 李亮, 黄栋梁, 张子健, 周靖, . 基于振动台试验的不同含石率土-石混合体边坡地震动响应差异性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2324-2337.
[10] 何梓雷, 蒋关鲁, 冯海洲, 潘申鑫, 何晓龙, 李杰, . 地震作用下桩板墙-锚索组合支护基覆型边坡的动力响应特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2011-2023.
[11] 李福秀, 郭文灏, 郑烨炜. 刚性墙面双面加筋土挡墙动力响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1957-1966.
[12] 朱丹, 蒋关鲁, 陈虹羽, 赵鑫辉, 黄德贵, 刘乙甫, . 单、双排桩支护路堑边坡动力响应特性的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1763-1777.
[13] 何梓雷, 蒋关鲁, 冯海洲, 陈虹羽, 郭玉丰, 何晓龙, 李杰, . 基于变形的降雨后地震基覆型边坡劣化特性与机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1789-1802.
[14] 陶志刚, 丰于翔, 赵易, 张晓宇, 何满潮, 雷啸天, . 穿断层隧道NPR锚索支护体系抗震特性振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(4): 939-949.
[15] 王通, 刘先峰, 袁胜洋, 蒋关鲁, 胡金山, 邵珠杰, 田士军, . 顺倾及反倾层状碎裂结构斜坡地震反应的大型振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 489-501.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!