岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5): 1289-1298.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1447

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

强震作用下液化场地群桩动力响应及p-y曲线

冯忠居1,孟莹莹1,张聪1,赖德金2,朱继新2,林路宇2   

  1. 1. 长安大学 公路学院,陕西 西安 710064;2 厦门路桥工程投资发展有限公司,福建 厦门 361026
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-27 修回日期:2022-01-13 出版日期:2022-05-11 发布日期:2022-05-02
  • 通讯作者: 孟莹莹,女,1995年生,硕士研究生,主要从事基础工程、岩土工程方面的研究。E-mail: 369927231@qq.com E-mail:ysf@gl.chd.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:冯忠居,男,1965年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事桩基础工程、岩土工程方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51708040);海南省交通科技项目(No. HNZXY2015-045R)。

Dynamic response and p-y curve of pile groups in liquefaction site under strong earthquake

FENG Zhong-ju1, MENG Ying-ying1, ZHANG Cong1, LAI De-jin2, ZHU Ji-xin2, LIN Lu-yu2   

  1. 1. School of Highway, Chang’an University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710064, China; 2. Xiamen Road and Bridge Engineering Investment Development Co., Ltd., Xiamen, Fujian 361026, China
  • Received:2021-08-27 Revised:2022-01-13 Online:2022-05-11 Published:2022-05-02
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51708040) and the Hainan Provincial Transportation Science and Technology Project (HNZXY2015-045R).

摘要: 为研究液化场地中群桩在强震作用下的动力响应特征及桩侧土抗力-桩土相对位移(p-y)曲线规律,依托海文大桥实体工程,基于振动台模型试验,开展了0.15g~0.35g地震动作用饱和粉细砂土层不同埋置深度下的砂土孔压比、桩身弯矩及p-y曲线动力响应研究。结果表明:地震动强度达到0.25g时,不同埋置深度下的饱和粉细砂土层孔压比均大于0.8,产生液化现象,且随埋置深度增加,孔压比增长时刻明显滞后;不同埋置深度下,桩身弯矩最大值均位于液化土层和非液化土层分界面处;同一埋置深度时,随地震动强度的增大,p-y曲线所包围的面积逐渐增大,其整体斜率逐渐变小,说明桩-土相互作用动力耗能逐渐增大,桩周土体刚度逐渐减小;随埋置深度增加,p-y曲线所包围的面积逐渐减小,其整体斜率逐渐增大,说明桩-土相互作用动力耗能逐渐减小,桩周土体刚度逐渐增大。因此,液化场地桥梁群桩抗震设计时,应综合考虑液化土层与桩基础的相互位置关系,确保桩基础在液化土层与非液化土层分界处的抗弯承载能力。

关键词: 桥梁桩基, 强震作用, 振动台试验, 液化场地, 动力响应, p-y曲线

Abstract: To investigate the dynamic response characteristics of pile groups in liquefaction sites under strong earthquakes as well as the laws between soil resistance and pile-soil relative displacement (p-y), a shaking table model test associated with the project of Haiwen Bridge was conducted. The dynamic responses of sand pore pressure ratio, pile bending moment and p-y curve under different embedded depths of saturated silty sand encountered by 0.15g-0.35g seismic action were studied. The results show that when the seismic intensity reaches 0.25g, the pore pressure ratio of saturated silty sand under different embedded depths is larger than 0.8 and the liquefaction phenomenon occurs. As the embedded depth increases, the increased time of the pore pressure ratio is obviously delayed. At different embedded depths, the maximum bending moment of the pile appears at the interface between liquefied soil layer and the non-liquefied soil layer. At the same embedded depth, the area surrounded by the p-y curve increases gradually with seismic intensity, and its overall slope decreases, indicating that the dynamic energy dissipation of pile-soil interaction increases gradually and that the stiffness of soil around the pile decreases gradually. As the embedded depth increases, the area enclosed by the p-y curve gradually decreases and its overall slope gradually increases, indicating that the dynamic energy dissipation of pile-soil interaction gradually decreases and the soil stiffness around the pile gradually increases. Therefore, when performing the seismic design of bridge pile groups at liquefied sites, the relationship between liquefied soil layer and pile foundation should be considered comprehensively to ensure the bending bearing capacity of the pile foundations at the boundary between liquefied and non-liquefied soil layers.

Key words: bridge pile foundation, strong earthquake action, shaking table test, liquefaction site, dynamic response, p-y curve

中图分类号: TU 473
[1] 可文海, 杨文海, 李源, 吴磊, . SH波作用下斜坡地形中桩基的动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(5): 1545-1544.
[2] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[3] 周文强, 蒋良潍, 罗强, 肖卓琦, 罗義錬, 魏明, . 锚杆框架梁柔性外锚头减震性能振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1163-1173.
[4] 刘文静, 邓辉, 周昕. 地震作用下含双层韧性剪切带高陡岩质边坡动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[5] 蔡晓光, 徐洪路, 王海云, 李思汉, 李莹, .

土工格栅加筋土挡墙水平地震系数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3033-3044.

[6] 田抒平, 王振钰, 张陈蓉, . 大直径单桩基础海上风机非线性共振特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 156-164.
[7] 杨耀辉, 辛公锋, 陈育民, 李召峰, . 排水桩-网复合地基处置可液化路堤地基的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 178-186.
[8] 马建勋, MOHAMMED El Hoseny, 庞盼望, 李文枭, 闫洪祥. 考虑土−结构相互作用的地下室层对高层建筑地震反应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2808-2822.
[9] 谢周州, 赵炼恒, 李亮, 黄栋梁, 张子健, 周靖, . 基于振动台试验的不同含石率土-石混合体边坡地震动响应差异性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2324-2337.
[10] 李福秀, 郭文灏, 郑烨炜. 刚性墙面双面加筋土挡墙动力响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 1957-1966.
[11] 何梓雷, 蒋关鲁, 冯海洲, 潘申鑫, 何晓龙, 李杰, . 地震作用下桩板墙-锚索组合支护基覆型边坡的动力响应特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2011-2023.
[12] 王智德, 司莹莹, 李杰, 钱梦凡, 安佳兴, . 低应变率冲击荷载下节理花岗岩的动力响应规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1755-1762.
[13] 朱丹, 蒋关鲁, 陈虹羽, 赵鑫辉, 黄德贵, 刘乙甫, . 单、双排桩支护路堑边坡动力响应特性的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1763-1777.
[14] 何梓雷, 蒋关鲁, 冯海洲, 陈虹羽, 郭玉丰, 何晓龙, 李杰, . 基于变形的降雨后地震基覆型边坡劣化特性与机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(6): 1789-1802.
[15] 张思宇, 李兆焱, 袁晓铭, . 国内外静力触探液化判别方法对比检验[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(5): 1517-1526.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!