岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3): 714-724.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0537

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于纤维加固砂土静力液化评估的超孔隙压力系数研究

张希栋1, 2,董晓强1, 2,段伟1, 2,谢明星1, 2   

  1. 1. 太原理工大学 土木工程学院,山西 太原 030024;2. 太原理工大学 山西省土木工程防灾与控制重点实验室,山西 太原 030024
  • 收稿日期:2023-05-01 接受日期:2023-07-13 出版日期:2024-03-11 发布日期:2024-03-20
  • 通讯作者: 董晓强,男,1974年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土力学和环境岩土工程等方面的研究工作。E-mail: dongxiaoqiang@tyut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:张希栋,男,1989年生,讲师,博士,主要从事砂土液化行为及纤维加固无黏性土的力学行为等方面的研究工作。E-mail: zhangxd123456@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    山西省科技厅基础研究计划青年科学研究项目(No.20210302124110);中国博士后科学基金面上项目(No.2022M712338);国家自然科学基金项目(No.52208362,No.52108332,No.51978438,No.52281340410)。

Excess pore pressure ratios for the assessment of static liquefaction in fiber-reinforced sand

ZHANG Xi-dong1, 2, DONG Xiao-qiang1, 2, DUAN Wei1, 2, XIE Ming-xing1, 2   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030024, China; 2. The Key Laboratory of Civil Engineering Disaster Prevention and Control in Shanxi Province, Taiyuan University of Technology, Taiyuan, Shanxi 030024, China
  • Received:2023-05-01 Accepted:2023-07-13 Online:2024-03-11 Published:2024-03-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Young Scholar of Science and Technology Committee of Shanxi Province Scheme, China (20210302124110), China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2022M712338) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52208362, 52108332, 51978438, 52281340410).

摘要: 纤维加固技术通过向土体中添加离散的抗拉纤维以改良土体的力学性能。通过对纤维加固疏松砂土开展不排水三轴压缩试验以分析其静力液化行为,并对比了不同超孔隙压力系数评估纤维加固砂土液化的可行性。试验结果表明,在不排水三轴压缩下,疏松砂土对静力液化异常敏感,而纤维加固可以有效阻止疏松砂土发生静力液化。纤维显著改变了砂土骨架在不排水三轴压缩下的有效应力路径,从而影响其液化行为。基于有效应力原理定义的传统超孔隙压力系数ru在评估纤维加固砂土的液化时具有明显缺陷。有效超孔隙压力系数ru和骨架超孔隙压力系数r* u为纤维加固砂土的液化评估提供了更加合理的指标。借助基于混合物法则的本构模型框架,骨架超孔隙压力系数引入了纤维的应力贡献,揭示了纤维、砂土骨架以及孔隙水的荷载分担机制。当r* u= 1时,砂土骨架的有效平均应力减小为0,纤维加固砂土发生液化。

关键词: 纤维加固, 砂土, 液化, 纤维应力, 超孔隙压力系数

Abstract:

Fiber-reinforcing technology involves adding discrete and tension-resistant fibers into soils to improve the mechanical properties of the soils. This study investigates the static liquefaction responses of the fibre-reinforced sand in loose states by performing the undrained triaxial compression tests. The feasibility of varied excess pore pressure ratios for assessing the liquefaction of fibre-reinforced sand also has been discussed. The test results reveal that the loose sand without reinforcement is highly susceptible to static liquefaction under undrained triaxial compression, while the inclusion of fibers prevents the development of static liquefaction in the sand samples. The presence of fibers significantly alters the effective stress path experienced by the sand skeleton and thereby influencing its liquefaction response. The conventionally defined excess pore pressure ratio (ru) based on the principle of effective stress may provide incorrect indications of liquefaction in fiber-reinforced sand. To address this, the study introduces the newly defined effective excess pore pressure ratio (ru) and the skeleton excess pore pressure ratio (r* u), which offer improved indications of liquefaction in reinforced sand. By invoking a constitutive framework based on the rule of mixture, the stress contributions of fibers are quantified. The skeleton excess pore pressure ratio takes into account stress contributions of the fibers and reveals how the external load is shared among the fibers, sand skeleton and the pore water. When r* u= 1 is attained, the effective mean stress carried by the sand skeleton drops to zero, resulting in liquefaction of the fiber-reinforced sand.

Key words: fiber-reinforcement, sand, liquefaction, fiber stress, excess pore pressure ratio

中图分类号: TU441
[1] 王宁博, 姚仰平, 刘林, 李翔宇, 毛安琪, 李宁, . 考虑围压效应的砂土统一硬化模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(S1): 297-308.
[2] 靳贵晓, 林劭聪, 姜启武, 黄明, 李熹, . 基于Kozeny-Carman方程的酶诱导碳酸钙沉淀固化砂土的渗流数学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(8): 2376-2386.
[3] 范猛, 李敬军, 杨正权, 刘小生, 朱凯斌, 赵剑明, . 基于标准贯入试验的液化判别方法对深埋砂土适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2085-2094.
[4] 宋伟涛, 张佩, 杜修力, 林庆涛, . 土性对浅埋盾构隧道施工地层响应影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2179-2188.
[5] 富海鹰, 钟雨薇, 王孝文, 吴博涵, 袁冉, . 基于次加载面理论的砂土临界状态参数模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(6): 1788-1798.
[6] 罗宣兵, 李清林, 陈文娟, 杨潇飞, 张美雪, . 不同含水率-冻结温度-骆驼刺根系含量下砂土冻融变形规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1174-1186.
[7] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[8] 金磊, 李晶晶, 李新明, 孙翰卿, . 柔性边界的有限差分法−离散元法模拟及其对砂土三轴固结排水和不排水剪切特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 980-990.
[9] 曹苏南, 李春红, 陈远兵, 费康, . 循环荷载作用下砂土−结构物仿生 界面剪切特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(3): 821-832.
[10] 耿潇威, 陈成, 孙中华, 黎伟, 王勇, 徐梦冰, 余颂, . 基于广义位势理论的考虑组构各向异性的砂土本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3175-3186.
[11] 慕焕东, 邓亚虹, 赵勋昌, 何乃楠, 郑龙浩, 何也, . 基于非饱和剪切体变特征的马兰黄土液化评价方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3197-3207.
[12] 杨耀辉, 辛公锋, 陈育民, 李召峰, . 排水桩-网复合地基处置可液化路堤地基的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 178-186.
[13] 龙潇, 孙锐, 郑桐, . 基于卷积神经网络的液化预测模型及可解释性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(9): 2741-2753.
[14] 许文昊, 王志华, 申志福, 高洪梅, 刘殷强, 张鑫磊, . 基于CFD-DEM方法的饱和砂土场地液化模拟研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(8): 2492-2501.
[15] 杨洋, 魏怡童. 基于分类树的液化概率等级评估新方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(7): 2175-2186.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!