岩土力学 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (8): 2761-2772.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2025.0980CSTR: 32223.14.j.rsm.2025.0980

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

多雨频震作用下红层堆积体动力响应与变形破坏模式

张朵朵,郑达,郭涛,代逸文,邓扬   

  1. 成都理工大学 地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室,四川 成都 610059
  • 收稿日期:2025-09-15 接受日期:2025-11-19 出版日期:2026-08-11 发布日期:2026-08-18
  • 通讯作者: 郑达,男,1977年生,博士,教授,主要从事地质灾害评价及高边坡稳定性的教学研究工作。E-mail: da.zheng@cdut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:张朵朵,女,2000年生,硕士研究生,主要从事岩土工程方面的研究。E-mail: 2023050307@cdut.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 42293353)

Dynamic response and deformation failure patterns of red-bed accumulation subjected to frequent rainfall and seismic activities

ZHANG Duo-duo, ZHENG Da, GUO Tao, DAI Yi-wen, DENG Yang   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China
  • Received:2025-09-15 Accepted:2025-11-19 Online:2026-08-11 Published:2026-08-18
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (42293353).

摘要: 我国西南地区地质条件复杂气象环境特殊,在基础建设过程中无法避免红层堆积体稳定性问题。因此,以雅安地区为研究对象,通过设计红层堆积体斜坡的双模型并行振动台试验,系统揭示地震单独作用与降雨-地震共同作用下红层堆积体的动力响应规律与变形破坏模式。试验综合宏观变形特征、含水率与孔隙水压力监测以及动力响应等多维度展开研究。研究结果表明:地震单独作用与降雨-地震共同作用下的斜坡变形破坏特征存在显著差异。地震单独作用时,变形主要集中于坡顶位置,表现为“强震启动-推移式”破坏特征;而在降雨-地震共同作用下,破坏区域扩展至坡顶与坡脚,呈现“渐进式滑移破坏”特征。从动力响应来看,地震单独作用时响应主要集中于坡顶区域,形成纵向响应区;而降雨-地震共同作用下,动力响应范围扩展至坡体顶部及中上部,从坡肩及坡面向内部扩展。分析认为降雨入渗导致土体含水率升高,有效应力降低与阻尼比提高是产生这一差异的主要原因。随着振动次数的增加,两种工况均表现出高程放大效应增强的趋势,其中降雨-地震共同作用下坡顶区域的累积效应尤为显著,揭示了降雨与高程协同作用是加剧斜坡动力响应的核心机制。

关键词: 红层堆积体, 振动台试验, 动力响应差异, 破坏模式

Abstract: The southwestern region of China features complex geological conditions and a unique climatic environment, making stability issues of red-bed accumulation slopes unavoidable during infrastructure construction. This study focuses on the Ya'an area and investigates the dynamic response characteristics and deformation failure mechanisms of red-bed accumulation slopes subjected to seismic activity alone as well as the combined rainfall-earthquake effects through dual-model parallel shaking table tests. The research integrates multi-dimensional approaches, including macroscopic deformation analysis, moisture content and pore water pressure monitoring, and dynamic response evaluation. Results show significant differences in deformation and failure patterns between the two conditions. Under seismic action alone, deformation primarily concentrates at the slope crest, manifesting as a “seismic-initiated push-type failure”. In contrast, under combined rainfall-earthquake action, the failure zone expands to both the slope crest and toe, exhibiting a “progressive sliding failure” pattern. In terms of dynamic response, seismic action alone leads to responses concentrated at the slope crest, forming a vertical response zone, whereas under combined rainfall-earthquake action, the dynamic response extends to the upper and middle parts of the slope, propagating from the slope shoulder and surface inward. Analysis indicates that rainfall infiltration increases soil moisture content, reduces effective stress, and raises the damping ratio, which constitutes the primary mechanism for these differences. Moreover, as the number of vibrations increases, both conditions demonstrate an enhanced elevation amplification effect, with the cumulative effect at the slope crest being particularly pronounced under combined rainfall-earthquake action. This highlights the synergistic influence of rainfall and elevation as the core mechanism intensifying the dynamic response of slopes.

Key words: red bed accumulation body, shaking table test, difference of dynamic response, failure mode

中图分类号: P 642,TU 433
[1] 雷勇, 刘政烨, 曹振, 胡伟. 跨越式下伏溶洞排桩桩端极限承载力试验及简化计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(7): 2261-2272.
[2] 袁坤. 预应力钢锚管-锚索组合结构承载力及失效机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(7): 2324-2336.
[3] 蒋亚龙, 周亚风, 徐彭楚璇, 张旗, 邱思宝. 变温−水冷循环作用下极硬花岗岩力学损伤特性及贯入性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(3): 856-868.
[4] 吴金标, 曾柳祁, 江益辉, 槐荣国, 曾程. 不同饱和度砂土中浅埋管道上拔抗力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2026, 47(1): 209-218.
[5] 储超群, 包兴佳, 毛明发, 吴顺川, 崔贺佳, . 深地灰岩三轴压缩声发射特征及破坏形式试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2049-2061.
[6] 刘健, 夏勇, 江权, 陈涛, 贺维国, 范国刚, 熊先涛, 郑虹, . 强烈构造区硬梁包水电站地下洞室群围岩变形破坏特征与泸定地震响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(7): 2265-2280.
[7] 汪昕, 幸安康, 曾子强, 姜祎, 徐建宇, 王晓南, 刘造保, . 层理铁矿石剪切力学性能试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1039-1048.
[8] 董建华, 杨博, 田文通, 吴晓磊, 何鹏飞, 赵律华, 连博, . 新型防液化抗滑桩研发与地震响应振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[9] 周文强, 蒋良潍, 罗强, 肖卓琦, 罗義錬, 魏明, . 锚杆框架梁柔性外锚头减震性能振动台模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(4): 1163-1173.
[10] 杨柳, 杨铎, 何满潮, . 基于纳米划痕的陆相页岩纹层界面过渡区分布范围定量研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(2): 353-367.
[11] 蔡晓光, 徐洪路, 王海云, 李思汉, 李莹, .

土工格栅加筋土挡墙水平地震系数研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(10): 3033-3044.

[12] 邓东平, 徐润冬, 彭一航, 文莎莎. 强度空间非均质性与各向异性特征下边坡稳定性极限平衡滑面应力法[J]. 岩土力学, 2025, 46(1): 55-72.
[13] 杨耀辉, 辛公锋, 陈育民, 李召峰, . 排水桩-网复合地基处置可液化路堤地基的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 178-186.
[14] 范浩, 王磊, 罗勇, 朱传奇, . 卸荷损伤砂岩的分级加载三轴蠕变力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 277-288.
[15] 高荡, 彭俊, 王航龙, 王林飞, 彭坤, . 含层理砂岩真三轴条件下力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(S1): 349-358.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!