Rock and Soil Mechanics ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 1295-1304.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0857

• Fundamental Theroy and Experimental Research • Previous Articles     Next Articles

Shaking table model test on seismic responses of utility tunnel with joint

FENG Li1, 2, DING Xuan-ming1, 2, WANG Cheng-long1, 2, CHEN Zhi-xiong1, 2   

  1. 1. College of Civil Engineering, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China; 2. Key Laboratory of New Technology for Construction of Cities in Mountain Area of Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing 400045, China
  • Received:2019-05-15 Revised:2020-01-05 Online:2020-04-11 Published:2020-07-01
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51622803, 51878103, 51778092) and the Graduate Research and Innovation Foundation of Chongqing, China (CYS18021).

Abstract: Deformation joints are universal in underground utility tunnels that belong to the shallow-buried and slender structure. Under seismic loads, the vibration response of the underground structure with a joint will be affected to a great extent. However, the studies on this problem are limited. In this paper, based on the shaking table model test that considers the influence of joints, the seismic response characteristics of the underground utility tunnel under seismic excitation with different waveforms and different peak accelerations were studied. The acceleration, soil pressure, displacement, strain, and bending moment were measured and analysed. The results indicated that the vibration of the tunnel was mainly affected by the surrounding soil and the sidewall of the joint section separated from soil during earthquake excitation, while the tunnel structure displayed a good integrity. The displacement of the tunnel joint was relatively small under the strong earthquake, which did not result in large-scale deformation failure. The distribution of seismic soil pressure under the strong earthquake was nonlinear. The moment on the joint section was less than that in the middle section in the earthquake, which was beneficial to seismic performance.

Key words: utility tunnel, shaking table test, dynamic response, acceleration

CLC Number: 

  • TU 315
[1] LIU Hong-shuai, YANG Jian-sheng, SONG Dong-song, SUN Qiang-qiang, . Centrifuge modeling on ground response of dry sand site under near-fault pulsed and non-pulsed ground motions [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1429-1441.
[2] KE Wen-hai, YANG Wen-hai, LI Yuan, WU Lei, . Dynamic response of pile foundation in slope topography under SH wave [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1545-1544.
[3] YANG Ming-hui, CAI Ming-hui, CHEN Bo, YANG Han, . A method for calculating horizontal impedance of a single pile considering wave-induced seabed dynamic response [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(5): 1563-1572.
[4] DONG Jian-hua, YANG Bo, TIAN Wen-tong, WU Xiao-lei, HE Peng-fei, ZHAO Lü-hua, LIAN Bo, . Research and development of novel anti-slide pile to prevent liquefaction and shaking table model test of seismic response [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(4): 1084-1094.
[5] ZHOU Wen-qiang, JIANG Liang-wei, LUO Qiang, XIAO Zhuo-qi, LUO Yi-lian, WEI Ming, . Shaking table test on seismic performance of anchoring frame beam with flexible external anchor heads [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(4): 1163-1173.
[6] LIU Wen-jing, DENG Hui, ZHOU Xin. Dynamic response of high steep rock slope with a double-layer ductile shear zone under earthquake action [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(11): 3534-3548.
[7] CAI Xiao-guang, XU Hong-lu, WANG Hai-yun, LI Si-han, LI Ying, . Horizontal seismic coefficient of geogrid reinforced soil retaining wall [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(10): 3033-3044.
[8] SONG Er-bo, YAO Yang-ping, NIU Xi-rong, . A real-time method for intelligent compaction quality of fill using peak acceleration [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2025, 46(10): 3054-3064.
[9] YANG Yao-hui, XIN Gong-feng, CHEN Yu-min, LI Zhao-feng, . Shaking table test on drainage pile-net composite foundation treated liquefiable subgrade [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(S1): 178-186.
[10] MA Jian-xun, MOHAMMED El Hoseny, PANG Pan-wang, LI Wen-xiao, YAN Hong-xiang. Effects of basement stories on seismic response of high-rise buildings considering soil-structure interaction [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(9): 2808-2822.
[11] XIE Zhou-zhou, ZHAO Lian-heng, LI Liang, HUANG Dong-liang, ZHANG Zi-jian, ZHOU Jing, . Difference of dynamic responses of soil-rock mixture slopes with different rock contents based on shaking table test [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(8): 2324-2337.
[12] LI Fu-xiu, GUO Wen-hao, ZHENG Ye-wei. Shaking table test of the back-to-back reinforced soil walls with full-height rigid facing [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(7): 1957-1966.
[13] HE Zi-lei, JIANG Guan-lu, FENG Hai-zhou, PAN Shen-xin, HE Xiao-long, LI Jie, . Dynamic response characteristics of bedrock and overburden layer slope supported by a combination of pile-sheet wall-anchor cables under earthquake action [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(7): 2011-2023.
[14] WANG Zhi-de, SI Ying-ying, LI Jie, QIAN Meng-fan, AN Jia-xing, . Dynamic response of jointed granite under low strain rate impact load [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(6): 1755-1762.
[15] ZHU Dan, JIANG Guan-lu, CHEN Hong-yu, ZHAO Xin-hui, HUANG De-gui, LIU Yi-fu, . Shaking table experimental study on the dynamic response characteristics of single and double-row pile-supported road graben slopes [J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2024, 45(6): 1763-1777.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!