›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (8): 2144-2150.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2015.08.003

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同初始损伤下大理岩卸荷的核磁共振试验研究

周科平,苏淑华,胡振襄,李杰林,杨 泽   

  1. 中南大学 资源与安全工程学院,湖南 长沙 410083
  • 收稿日期:2014-11-04 出版日期:2015-08-11 发布日期:2018-06-13
  • 作者简介:周科平,男,1964年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事矿山岩石力学方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    十二五国家科技支撑计划课题(No. 2013BAB02B05);国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 51274253);国家重大科学仪器设备开发专项(No. 2013YQ17046310)。

Experimental research into nuclear magnetic resonance in marble with different initial damages under unloading conditions

ZHOU Ke-ping, SU Shu-hua, HU Zhen-xiang, LI Jie-lin, YANG Ze   

  1. School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410083, China
  • Received:2014-11-04 Online:2015-08-11 Published:2018-06-13

摘要: 为研究不同初始损伤下大理岩的卸荷特性,开展相同初始围压、不同初始轴压的常规三轴加-卸载试验,并进行加-卸载后岩样的核磁共振(NMR)特性试验研究,得到岩样孔隙度、应变、核磁共振图像及T2谱分布等参量。结果表明:(1)随着卸荷的进行,岩样孔隙度增大,且当初始轴压为三轴抗压强度(TCS)的90%时,其卸荷过程比80%与70%时更加平稳;(2)初始损伤可以有效促进应变的增大,尤其对环向扩容效应影响显著,同时应变的增长能促进裂隙的发育;(3)初始损伤较小时,岩样经历弹性变形到塑性变形的转化,岩石的T2图谱中小孔隙谱峰先向左移,后向右移,大孔隙谱峰不断向右扩展,反映了卸荷初期产生新的小孔隙,卸荷后期主要是大、小裂隙的扩展、贯通。当初始损伤较大时,T2图谱只向右扩展,反映岩样以扩展大孔隙为主,岩样只经历塑性变形;(4)初始损伤越大,相同卸荷围压比的核磁共振图像白斑亮度和面积越大,岩样的孔隙度就越大。

关键词: 核磁共振, 初始损伤, 卸荷, 孔隙度, T2谱分布

Abstract: To study the unloading characteristic of marble with different initial damages, conventional triaxial loading-unloading tests were conducted under the same initial confining pressure but different axial pressures. Moreover, the rock samples subjected to loading-unloading conditions were performed to investigate the nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) behaviour. The rock porosity, strain, nuclear magnetic resonance image (NMRI) and crosswise relaxation time T2 distribution were obtained. The results showed that: (1) the rock porosity increased during the unloading process. When the initial axial pressure was at 90% of the triaxial compressive strength (TCS), the unloading process was more steady than at either 70% or 80% TCS. (2) The initial damage advanced the increase of strain, in particular the hoop expansion, which in turn accelerated the growth of microcracks. (3) When the initial damage was low, the deformation of rock sample changed from elastic to plastic. Spectral peaks of the small microcracks moved from left to right, while spectral peaks of the large microcracks continuously extended to right, which indicated that small microcracks were generated at the initial stage of unloading, and both small and large microcracks propagated and coalesced at the last stage. When the initial damage was sufficiently high, T2 spectrum curves just moved towards right, which meant that the propagation of large microcracks played a vital role and the rock had undergone only the plastic deformation. (4) When the initial damage was increased, both the intensity and area of NMRI white spot and the rock porosity were increased at the same unloading confining pressure ratio.

Key words: nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), initial damage, unloading, porosity, T2 spectrum distribution

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452
[1] 任青阳, 张黄梅, 刘佳申, . 两种卸荷路径下泥岩流变特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 127-134.
[2] 翟明磊, 郭保华, 王辰霖, 焦峰, . 法向卸荷下贯通裂隙岩样压剪破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 217-223.
[3] 金爱兵, 刘佳伟, 赵怡晴, 王本鑫, 孙浩, 魏余栋, . 卸荷条件下花岗岩力学特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 459-467.
[4] 侯公羽, 荆浩勇, 梁金平, 张广东, 谭金鑫, 张永康, 杨希, . 不同卸荷速率下矩形巷道变形及 声发射特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3309-3318.
[5] 李晶晶, 孔令伟, . 膨胀土卸荷蠕变特性及其非线性蠕变模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3465-3475.
[6] 李杰林, 朱龙胤, 周科平, 刘汉文, 曹善鹏, . 冻融作用下砂岩孔隙结构损伤特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3524-3532.
[7] 郑坤, 孟庆山, 汪稔, 吴文娟, . 不同结构类型珊瑚礁灰岩弹性波特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3081-3089.
[8] 李新明, 孔令伟, 郭爱国, . 南阳原状膨胀土不排水剪切性状时效性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2947-2955.
[9] 李建朋, 高岭, 母焕胜. 高应力卸荷条件下砂岩扩容特征及其剪胀角函数[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2119-2126.
[10] 王士权, 魏明俐, 何星星, 张亭亭, 薛 强, . 基于核磁共振技术的淤泥固化水分转化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1778-1786.
[11] 王铁行, 金 鑫, 罗 扬, 张松林. 考虑卸荷作用的黄土湿陷性评价方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1281-1290.
[12] 李新明, 孔令伟, 郭爱国, . 考虑卸荷速率的K0固结膨胀土应力-应变行为[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1299-1306.
[13] 任克彬, 王 博, 李新明, 尹 松, . 毛细水干湿循环作用下土遗址的强度特性 与孔隙分布特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 962-970.
[14] 江强强, 刘路路, 焦玉勇, 王 浩, . 干湿循环下滑带土强度特性与微观结构试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1005-1012.
[15] 丛 怡, 丛 宇, 张黎明, 贾乐鑫, 王在泉, . 大理岩加、卸荷破坏过程的三维颗粒流模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1179-1186.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王 刚,李术才,王明斌. 渗透压力作用下加锚裂隙岩体围岩稳定性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2843 -2849 .
[2] 刘玉成,曹树刚,刘延保. 可描述地表沉陷动态过程的时间函数模型探讨[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 925 -931 .
[3] 介玉新,杨光华. 基于广义位势理论的弹塑性模型的修正方法[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 38 -42 .
[4] 杨建民,郑 刚. 基坑降水中渗流破坏归类及抗突涌验算公式评价[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 261 -264 .
[5] 周 华,王国进,傅少君,邹丽春,陈胜宏. 小湾拱坝坝基开挖卸荷松弛效应的有限元分析[J]. , 2009, 30(4): 1175 -1180 .
[6] 叶 飞,朱合华,何 川. 盾构隧道壁后注浆扩散模式及对管片的压力分析[J]. , 2009, 30(5): 1307 -1312 .
[7] 罗 强 ,王忠涛 ,栾茂田 ,杨蕴明 ,陈培震. 非共轴本构模型在地基承载力数值计算中若干影响因素的探讨[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 732 -0737 .
[8] 王云岗 ,章 光 ,胡 琦. 斜桩基础受力特性研究[J]. , 2011, 32(7): 2184 -2190 .
[9] 龚维明,黄 挺,戴国亮. 海上风电机高桩基础关键参数试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 115 -121 .
[10] 汪成兵. 均质岩体中隧道围岩破坏过程的试验与数值模拟[J]. , 2012, 33(1): 103 -108 .