›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (10): 2983-2988.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2015.10.032

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

刍议相关规范中关于单桩承载力计算的几点疑惑

付文光   

  1. 中国京冶工程技术有限公司,北京 100088
  • 收稿日期:2015-07-13 出版日期:2015-10-10 发布日期:2018-06-13
  • 作者简介:付文光,男,1970年生,学士,教高,注册岩土工程师,主要从事岩土工程的设计咨询、工程实践、试验研究等

Discussions on some controversies about pile bearing capacity calculation in the codes

FU Wen-guang   

  1. China Jingye Engineering Corporation Limited Company, Beijing 100088, China
  • Received:2015-07-13 Online:2015-10-10 Published:2018-06-13

摘要: 国内相关规范中单桩抗压承载力设计计算方法分为特征值法及极限值法两类,单桩承载力均通过桩侧阻力与桩端阻力直接相加的方法得到,在概念及理论上均存在着不完善之处,主要原因是桩侧阻力与桩端阻力的力学特性及对变形的要求不同、不能同步发挥所致。相对来说,极限值设计法更直接、更可靠、更准确,概念更明确,且易于与国际接轨,建议规范优先采用。不同规范根据抗拔试验结果求取单桩抗拔承载力的计算方法存在矛盾,建议求取时桩的自重按天然重度计算、不考虑水的浮力。建议相关规范对以下两种现象进行深入研究:桩长超过有效长度后,单位长度侧摩阻力将会降低;部分工程中得到的抗拔桩的抗拔系数远小于相关规范推荐值,尤其是桩长较长时。

关键词: 单桩承载力, 特征值, 极限值, 浮重度, 有效长度, 抗拔系数

Abstract: The designing and calculating methods for compressive bearing capacity of a single pile can be divided into two types, i.e. characteristic value method and ultimate value method, in the Chinese codes related to pile foundations. The bearing capacity of a single pile is obtained by directly summarizing the skin friction and the tip resistance. These methods have some conceptual and theoretical disadvantages, since the skin friction and tip resistance cannot be simultaneously mobilized due to different mechanical responses and deformation requirements at the pile skin and the pile tip. The ultimate value method is more direct, reliable, accurate and clear in concept, and is more ready to be used in parallel to international standards. Hence it is suggested here that this method is preferred in the standards. A contradiction may occur in determining the uplift bearing capacity of a single pile according to the results of pull-out tests using the different standards. Because of this, the natural unit weight of pile should be used in calculation, instead of the buoyant unit weight of pile. Further research should be conducted to explore the following two phenomena in revising the relevant codes: one is that the unit skin friction decreases when exceeding the effective length of the pile, and the other is that tension coefficients for pull-out pile in some engineering is far less than the recommended values in the relevant codes, especially when pile length is longer.

Key words: bearing capacity of pile, characteristic value, ultimate value, buoyant unit weight, effective length, tension coefficient

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473.1
[1] 田密, 盛小涛, . 岩土工程最小勘探数据量确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 400-408.
[2] 李 闽 ,陶正武 ,刘全稳 ,吴泽民 ,李 涛 ,肖文联 ,亢 鞠,. 用积分法求取岩石孔隙结构特征值[J]. , 2015, 36(5): 1352-1356.
[3] 许 江 ,叶桂兵 ,李波波 ,曹 偈 ,张 敏 , . 不同黏结剂配比条件下型煤力学及渗透特性试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(1): 104-110.
[4] 高 盟 ,王 滢 ,高广运 ,顾宝和 ,杨成斌 . 一种大直径扩底桩端阻力和侧阻力的确定方法[J]. , 2013, 34(3): 797-801.
[5] 孙熙平,张宝华,张 强,王笑难. 重力式码头基床遭水流冲刷后的稳定性分析[J]. , 2010, 31(10): 3184-3190.
[6] 彭柏兴 ,王星华 . 软岩旁压试验与单轴抗压试验对比研究[J]. , 2006, 27(3): 451-454.
[7] 柴华友 ,白世伟 ,刘明贵 ,卢应发 . 瑞利波特性刚度矩阵分析方法[J]. , 2006, 27(2): 209-213.
[8] 周洪波 ,黄胜生,. 锚桩法单桩静载试验中群桩相互作用及误差分析[J]. , 2004, 25(10): 1613-1616.
[9] 郑 刚 ,任彦华,. 桩承载力时效对桩土相互作用及沉降的影响分析[J]. , 2003, 24(1): 65-69.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .
[2] 张文杰,陈云敏. 垃圾填埋场抽水试验及降水方案设计[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 211 -215 .
[3] 宫伟力,安里千,赵海燕,毛灵涛. 基于图像描述的煤岩裂隙CT图像多尺度特征[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 371 -376 .
[4] 万 智,董 辉,刘宝琛. 基于正交设计下SVM滑坡变形时序回归预测的超参数选择[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 503 -508 .
[5] 孙曦源,栾茂田,唐小微. 饱和软黏土地基中桶形基础水平承载力研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 667 -672 .
[6] 王明年,郭 军,罗禄森,喻 渝,杨建民,谭忠盛. 高速铁路大断面黄土隧道深浅埋分界深度研究[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1157 -1162 .
[7] 谭峰屹,姜志全,李仲秋,颜惠和. 附加质量法在昆明新机场填料压实密度检测中的应用研究[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2214 -2218 .
[8] 王光进,杨春和,张 超,马洪岭,孔祥云,侯克鹏. 超高排土场的粒径分级及其边坡稳定性分析研究[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 905 -913 .
[9] 胡海军,蒋明镜,赵 涛,彭建兵,李 红. 制样方法对重塑黄土单轴抗拉强度影响的初探[J]. , 2009, 30(S2): 196 -199 .
[10] 李 敏,柴寿喜,王晓燕,魏 丽. 以强度增长率评价麦秸秆加筋盐渍土的加筋效果[J]. , 2011, 32(4): 1051 -1056 .