›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3): 985-992.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.0756

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于压水试验的地层渗流场反分析

王洪波,张庆松,刘人太,李术才,张乐文,郑 卓,张连震   

  1. 山东大学 岩土与结构工程研究中心,山东 济南 250061
  • 收稿日期:2016-04-12 出版日期:2018-03-12 发布日期:2018-06-06
  • 通讯作者: 刘人太,男,1984年生,博士,讲师,主要从事地下工程不良地质预报与治理的研究工作。E-mail: rentailiu @163.com E-mail:hongbo_wangsdu@163.com
  • 作者简介:王洪波,男,1990年生,博士研究生,主要从事地下工程水灾害治理理论及工程应用方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No.41272385);博导基金项目(No.20130131110032);国家自然科学青年基金项目(No.51309146)。

Inverse analysis of seepage field from packer permeability test

WANG Hong-bo, ZHANG Qing-song, LIU Ren-tai, LI Shu-cai, ZHANG Le-wen, ZHENG Zhuo, ZHANG Lian-zheng   

  1. Geotechnical and Structural Engineering Research Center, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250061, China
  • Received:2016-04-12 Online:2018-03-12 Published:2018-06-06
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41272385), the Doctoral Supervisor Fund Project (20130131110032) and the Young National Natural Science Foundation of China (51309146).

摘要: 地下工程建设过程中,地下水分布以及岩体渗透参数确定至关重要。基于对解决欠定反分析问题的目标函数分析,通过利用适应度函数、地质统计原理和变差函数等优化,得到了解决地层渗透系数一类水文地质问题的罚函数,为解决欠定的反分析问题提供了一个优化评判准则,并结合粒子群算法建立优化反分析数学模型;提出利用压水试验钻孔水头变化反分析得到地层渗透系数的新方法。对南京地铁上元门车站,进行现场压水试验得到钻孔水头高度,利用经过罚函数优化的反分析数值计算获得地层渗透系数,对压水试验区域的电阻率跨孔CT探测验证了该方法区域上的正确性,该区域的钻孔原位渗透系数测试验证了该方法在数值上的准确性。结果表明,经过罚函数优化的反分析计算的准确率达到90%,说明该方法有助于得到全面的地层水文地质信息,对后续的治理具有指导作用,希望能对类似工程有一定的借鉴意义。

关键词: 罚函数, 粒子群算法(PSO), 评判准则, 压水试验, 反分析, 渗流场

Abstract: Groundwater distribution and determination of rock mass permeability parameters are very important in the process of underground engineering construction. Based on analysis of the objective function of underdetermined problem, and through the use of fitness function and the principle of geological statistics and variation function optimization, we obtain a class of hydrogeological problems' penalty function for solving formation permeability coefficient, which provides an optimized evaluation criterion to solve the problem of inverse analysis of underdetermined problem. Also, a mathematical model of optimized back analysis combined with particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm is established, and a new method to evaluate formation permeability coefficient is proposed using back analysis of the drilling head change from packer permeability test. At Nanjing Shang Yuanmen subway station, we conduct packer permeability test to get drilling head height on-site, and obtain permeability coefficient of the layer by using back analysis numerical calculation to optimize the penalty function. Detection of the resistivity cross-hole CT is conducted to verify the accuracy of the method, and drilling in-situ permeability tests verify the accuracy of the method to obtain numerical results. The results show that calculation accuracy reached 90% after analysis optimization by a penalty function, which proves that the method helps in getting comprehensive formation hydrogeological information. The method is important for the follow-up governance, which is expected to have certain reference significance for similar projects.

Key words: penalty function, particle swarm optimization (PSO), evaluation criterion, packer permeability test, back analysis, seepage field

中图分类号: 

  • O 357.3

[1] 胡盛斌, 杜国平, 徐国元, 周天忠, 钟有信, 石重庆, . 基于能量测量的声呐渗流矢量法及其应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2143-2154.
[2] 曹洪, 胡瑶, 骆冠勇. 滤管两端均不在含水层层面的承压不 完整井近似计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2774-2780.
[3] 谢 强, 田大浪, 刘金辉, 张建华, 张志斌, . 土质边坡的饱和−非饱和渗流分析及特殊应力修正[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 879-892.
[4] 李连祥, 刘嘉典, 李克金, 黄亨利, 季相凯, . 济南典型地层HSS参数选取及适用性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4021-4029.
[5] 孙明社,马 涛,申志军,吴 旭,王梦恕,. 复合式衬砌结构中衬砌分担围岩压力比例的研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 437-445.
[6] 王少杰,吕爱钟,张晓莉. 横观各向同性岩体中马蹄形隧洞的位移反分析方法[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 495-504.
[7] 张晨阳,张 明,张泰丽,孙 强,杨 龙,. 侵入岩脉风化壳对中林村残积土滑坡渗流场和稳定性的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2617-2625.
[8] 李建朋,聂庆科,刘泉声,于俊超,. 基于权重反分析的岩溶地面塌陷危险性评价方法研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1395-1400.
[9] 王志良,年玉泽,申林方,徐则民,. 植被发育斜坡土体大孔隙三维重构模型渗流场的LBM数值模拟[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3821-3829.
[10] 伍宇腾,韩增强,王川婴,周济芳,胡 胜,汪进超,. 基于裂隙充填特征的坝基岩体灌浆效果评价[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 311-316.
[11] 田茂霖,肖洪天,闫强刚,. Hoek-Brown准则岩体力学参数非线性位移反分析[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 343-350.
[12] 袁艳玲,郭琴琴,周正军,吴震宇,陈建康,姚福海,. 考虑参数相关的高心墙堆石坝材料参数反分析[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 463-470.
[13] 郑亚飞,张璐璐,张 洁,郑建国,于永堂,. 基于时变监测数据的降雨滑坡多目标随机反分析[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3371-3377.
[14] 张志增 ,李小昌 ,王克忠,. 考虑剪应力作用时横观各向同性岩体中圆形巷道位移反分析的惟一性[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 449-460.
[15] 肖俊华,赵锡宏,. 软土地区深埋桩筏基础沉降实测与反分析[J]. , 2016, 37(6): 1680-1688.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!