›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (6): 1716-1724.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.06.021

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

P波斜入射陡坎地形对地面运动的影响

丁海平1, 2,于彦彦1,郑志法1   

  1. 1. 苏州科技大学 江苏省结构工程重点实验室,江苏 苏州 215011;2. 中国地震局工程力学研究所,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150080
  • 收稿日期:2015-10-16 出版日期:2017-06-12 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 作者简介:丁海平,男,1966年生,博士,教授,主要从事地震工程和防灾减灾工程。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51278323);国家自然科学基金重大研究计划集成项目(No.91215301)。

Effects of scarp topography on seismic ground motion under inclined P waves

DING Hai-ping1, 2, YU Yan-yan1, ZHENG Zhi-fa1   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Structure Engineering of Jiangsu Province, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou, Jiangsu 215011, China; 2. Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150080, China
  • Received:2015-10-16 Online:2017-06-12 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51278323) and the Major Research Plan Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (91215301).

摘要: 针对陡坎地形,采用数值模拟方法,探讨了陡坎地形在P波斜入射时,入射角度 、坡角 和入射方向变化等参数对地震波传播的影响。结果表明:(1)从陡坎底部到陡坎顶部,放大系数逐渐增大,而入射角度、坡角和入射方向没有影响。(2)入射角度 一定时,无论地震波顺着陡坎方向(左)入射还是逆着陡坎方向(右)入射,陡坎上侧的放大系数大于陡坎下侧的放大系数。同时,放大系数随着坡角 的增大而增大。(3)坡角 不变,地震波顺着陡坎方向(左)入射时,x 分量的放大系数随着入射角的增大而增大,z分量的放大系数则随着入射角的增大而减小。(4)地震波逆着陡坎方向(右)入射时,放大系数最大值基本在陡坎上侧边缘。地震波顺着陡坎方向(左)入射时,放大系数最大值并没出现在陡坎上侧边缘,坡角越大,偏离越大。(5)地震波顺着陡坎方向(左)入射时, x分量的放大系数比地震波逆着陡坎方向(右)入射时的大,z分量变化不大。

关键词: 陡坎地形, P波斜入射, 地面运动, 放大系数

Abstract: In this study, the seismic ground motion of the scarp topography under inclined P waves was analyzed using numerical simulation method. The effects of the incident degree, the slope angle, and the incident direction of seismic ground motion were discussed as well. It is found that from the bottom of scarp to the top, the amplification factor increased gradually, whereas it had no influence on the incident degree, the slope angle and the incident direction. When the incident degree was constant, the amplification factor of the scarp upside region was greater than that of the scarp downside region, regardless of the incident directions. At the same time, the amplification factor at the crest of the slope increased with the increase of the slope angle. When the slope angle was constant and the waves travelled away from the slope, the amplification factor of x component increased, while the amplification factor of z component decreased with the increase of incident angle. The results show that for waves travelling into the slope, the maximum amplification factor is generally found around the crest of the slope. For waves travelling away from the slope, the maximum amplification factor shifted from the slope crest. Moreover, the larger the slope angle, the farther the departure. The amplification factor of x component was larger for waves travelling away from the slope as compared to waves travelling into the slope, but the amplification factor of z component had no obvious change with the incident direction.

Key words: scarp topography, inclined P wave, ground motion, amplification factor

中图分类号: 

  • P 315.9

[1] 张卢明, 周勇, 范刚, 蔡红雨, 董云. 强震作用下核安全级反倾层状软岩高陡边坡组合支挡结构抗震性能研究与加固效果评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1740-1749.
[2] 潘旦光, 程业, 陈清军. 地下商场结构对地面运动影响的振动台试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1134-1145.
[3] 王文沛, 李 滨, 冯 振, 张博文, 高 杨, . 考虑场地效应的高陡岩质斜坡地震失稳机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 297-304.
[4] 欧阳芳,张建经,韩建伟,王志佳,吴金标,杨义奎. 包裹碎石桩和碎石桩复合地基抗震性能对比试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(4): 998-1004.
[5] 周 飞 ,许 强 ,刘汉香 ,王 龙,. 地震作用下含水平软弱夹层斜坡动力响应特性研究[J]. , 2016, 37(1): 133-139.
[6] 高 峰 ,孙常新 ,谭绪凯 ,朱 艺 ,李 虎,. 不同埋深隧道的地震响应振动台试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(9): 2517-2522.
[7] 张建经 ,范 刚 ,王志佳 ,张 明 ,彭盛恩,. 小角度成层倾斜场地动力响应分析的大型振动台试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(3): 617-624.
[8] 罗 超 ,楼梦麟 ,桂国庆,. 确定大跨连续刚构桥地震动输入时程方法比较[J]. , 2014, 35(S1): 414-422.
[9] 李 鹏,苏生瑞,王闫超,王 琦. 含软弱层岩质边坡的动力响应研究[J]. , 2013, 34(S1): 365-370.
[10] 刘汉香 ,许 强 ,范宣梅 ,徐鸿彪 . 地震动强度对斜坡加速度动力响应规律的影响[J]. , 2012, 33(5): 1357-1365.
[11] 董金玉 ,杨国香 ,伍法权 ,祁生文. 地震作用下顺层岩质边坡动力响应和破坏模式大型振动台试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 2977-2982.
[12] 周 晖,李俊杰,康 飞. 面板堆石坝坝顶加速度沿坝轴线分布规律[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1534-1538.
[13] 李华明,蒋关鲁,刘先峰. CFG桩加固饱和粉土地基的动力特性试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1550-1554.
[14] 唐 海,李俊如. 凸形地貌对爆破震动波传播影响的数值模拟[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1289-1294.
[15] 陈志刚. 浅埋孔洞对地表反平面运动的影响[J]. , 2007, 28(8): 1655-1660.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!