岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1): 297-304.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.1163

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑场地效应的高陡岩质斜坡地震失稳机制

王文沛1,李 滨2,冯 振2,张博文3,高 杨2   

  1. 1. 中国地质环境监测院,北京 100081;2. 中国地质科学院 地质力学研究所,北京 100081;3. 中国地质大学(北京) 工程技术学院,北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-07 出版日期:2019-01-11 发布日期:2019-01-31
  • 作者简介:王文沛,男,1985年生,博士,高级工程师,主要从事地质灾害和防治等方面研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 41502305);企业合作项目(No. WDD0385)

Failure mechanism of a high-steep rock slope considering site effect

WANG Wen-pei1, LI Bin2, FENG Zhen2, ZHANG Bo-wen3, GAO Yang2   

  1. 1. China Institute of Geological Environment Monitoring, Beijing 100081, China; 2. Institute of Geomechanics, Chinese Academy of Geological Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; 3. School of Engineering and Technology, China University of Geosciences, Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2017-06-07 Online:2019-01-11 Published:2019-01-31
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41502305) and the Enterprise Cooperation Project (WDD0385).

摘要: 以金沙江乌东德水电站右岸的鸡冠山梁子高陡斜坡为典型实例,在斜坡表层地震动监测基础上,通过在斜坡弹性模型底部分别输入水平、竖向Ricker子波,发现:斜坡顶部低模量岩体材料在水平Rick子波激励下,易产生放大效应;而当输入竖向Rick子波时,易在模型表层地形凸起部位产生共振放大,其顶面表层卓越频率也与现场实测值基本一致。其次,对比分析了在分别输入汶川八角什邡加速度记录、典型鲁甸地震加速度记录时的斜坡弹塑性模型的稳定性和动力响应特征,发现:(1)斜坡在静力条件下可能存在3种不同位置潜在滑面,但输入两种地震波后,变形破坏区仅发生在顶部滑面位置;(2)输入汶川地震波时,斜坡顶部滑面剪应变增量明显大于输入鲁甸地震波时对应值,且前者的滑面出现明显整体拉破坏区,滑面上部水平、竖向残余变形也不收敛,处于震后斜坡失稳状态。后者滑面底部无明显的拉破坏区,滑面上部残余变形收敛,处于震后斜坡稳定状态;(3)斜坡水平、竖向加速度都在斜坡顶部低模量材料表层出现明显的放大现象,场地效应明显。此外,表层加速度普遍大于斜坡内部相应值,尤其是地形凸起位置。输入汶川地震波时斜坡顶部水平向加速度放大系数大于鲁甸地震波相应值,但竖向加速度放大系数两者基本一致。

关键词: 场地效应, 失稳机制, 高陡斜坡, 放大系数

Abstract: The Jiguanshanliangzi high-steep slope is taken as a typical case study in Wudongde hydropower station near Chin-sha River. Based on seismic monitoring of the slope surface, firstly, after inputting horizontal and vertical Ricker wavelets at the elastic slope model bottom, it is found that the low modulus of rock mass materials at the slope top is easily amplified after the excitation of the horizontal Rick wavelet. The surface convex topography is easy to produce resonance amplification when the vertical Rick wavelet is excited. The predominant frequencies of the top surface are consistent with the measured values. Secondly, comparative analysis of the slope stability and dynamic response characteristics are performed when inputting the real Wenchuan and Ludian earthquake acceleration records. It can be found that the slope may have three different potential slip surfaces at different locations under the static condition. However, when inputting the above two seismic waves, the deformation and failure occur only at the slope top position. When inputting the Wenchuan seismic wave, the shear strain increment of the top slip surface is significantly greater than that when inputting Ludian seismic wave. The tension failure zone is observed at the slip surface and the horizontal and vertical residual deformation is not convergence. The slope is at the state of instability after the earthquake. When inputting the Ludian seismic wave, there is no tensile failure zone observed at the slip surface and the residual deformation is convergence, which means that the slope is stable after the earthquake. The slope of horizontal and vertical acceleration at the slope top surface appears significantly enlargement due to a low modulus material, showing obvious site effect. In addition, the surface acceleration is generally greater than the corresponding values within the slope, especially at the location of convex topography. The amplification factor of horizontal acceleration at the slope top after inputting the Wenchuan seismic wave is greater than that after inputting the Ludian seismic wave, but the vertical acceleration amplification factors are essentially the same.

Key words: site effect, failure mechanism, high-steep slope, amplification factor

中图分类号: 

  • P 642.22
[1] 张卢明, 周勇, 范刚, 蔡红雨, 董云. 强震作用下核安全级反倾层状软岩高陡边坡组合支挡结构抗震性能研究与加固效果评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1740-1749.
[2] 何颖, 于琴, 刘中宪, . 考虑散射效应沉积河谷空间相关多点地震动模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2739-2747.
[3] 巨能攀, 邓天鑫, 李龙起, 蒋金阳, 张陈羊. 强震作用下陡倾顺层斜坡倾倒变形 机制离心振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 99-108.
[4] 赵明华,陈耀浩,杨超炜,肖 尧. 基于有限杆单元法的陡坡基桩非线性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 3020-3028.
[5] 刘中宪,齐 欣,王 冬,柴寿喜,姚 殊,. 沉积河谷-建筑群地震动力相互作用的二维IBEM模拟[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3803-3811.
[6] 丁海平,于彦彦,郑志法,. P波斜入射陡坎地形对地面运动的影响[J]. , 2017, 38(6): 1716-1724.
[7] 欧阳芳,张建经,韩建伟,王志佳,吴金标,杨义奎. 包裹碎石桩和碎石桩复合地基抗震性能对比试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(4): 998-1004.
[8] 王维早 ,许 强 ,郑 光 ,李嘉雨 ,罗博宇,. 强降雨诱发缓倾堆积层边坡失稳离心模型试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(1): 87-95.
[9] 周 飞 ,许 强 ,刘汉香 ,王 龙,. 地震作用下含水平软弱夹层斜坡动力响应特性研究[J]. , 2016, 37(1): 133-139.
[10] 乔 兰 ,姜 波 ,庞林祥 ,崔 明,. 降雨入渗对板岩边坡稳定的影响及加固措施研究[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 545-550.
[11] 高 峰 ,孙常新 ,谭绪凯 ,朱 艺 ,李 虎,. 不同埋深隧道的地震响应振动台试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(9): 2517-2522.
[12] 李小军 ,侯春林 ,戴志军 ,梅泽洪,. 核岛结构设计地基场地及计算基底效应研究[J]. , 2015, 36(8): 2201-2208.
[13] 张建经 ,范 刚 ,王志佳 ,张 明 ,彭盛恩,. 小角度成层倾斜场地动力响应分析的大型振动台试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(3): 617-624.
[14] 卢书强 ,易庆林 ,易 武 ,黄海峰 ,张国栋 , . 三峡库区树坪滑坡变形失稳机制分析[J]. , 2014, 35(4): 1123-1130.
[15] 李 鹏,苏生瑞,王闫超,王 琦. 含软弱层岩质边坡的动力响应研究[J]. , 2013, 34(S1): 365-370.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!