岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1): 99-108.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.1274

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

强震作用下陡倾顺层斜坡倾倒变形 机制离心振动台试验

巨能攀,邓天鑫,李龙起,蒋金阳,张陈羊   

  1. 成都理工大学 地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室,四川 成都 610059
  • 收稿日期:2017-06-21 出版日期:2019-01-11 发布日期:2019-01-30
  • 通讯作者: 李龙起,男,1986年生,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事地质工程和岩土工程的教学和科研工作。E-mail: 287820171@qq.com E-mail:jnp@cdut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:巨能攀,男,1973年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事地质工程和岩土工程的教学和科研工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金资助(No. 41372306,No. 41502299);成都理工大学青年骨干计划(No. KYGG201720)。

Centrifugal shaking table test on toppling deformation mechanism of steep bedding slope under strong earthquake

JU Neng-pan, DENG Tian-xin, LI Long-qi, JIANG Jin-yang, ZHANG Chen-yang   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protection, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China
  • Received:2017-06-21 Online:2019-01-11 Published:2019-01-30
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41372306, 41502299) and Chengdu University of Technology Skeleton Project (KYGG201720).

摘要: 陡倾顺层斜坡在静力条件下的稳定性一般较好,但是在“5.12”汶川地震中该类型斜坡却发生了大量的失稳破坏现象,通过现场调查在陡倾软硬相间顺层斜坡中发现了一类特殊的动力变形破坏模式——倾倒变形。在已有认识基础上,以四川汶川县水磨沟陡倾软硬相间顺层斜坡在强震作用下的失稳案例为基础,通过离心振动台试验研究该类型斜坡在强震作用下的倾倒变形机制和动力响应规律特性。研究表明:在斜坡表面,随着高程的增加,加速度放大系数总体表现出先增大、后减小、再增大的节律性变化,在坡高1/3处和坡肩部位动力响应呈现两个峰值。在同一水平高度下,越靠近坡表,加速度放大系数越大,即斜坡岩土体临空面效应较为显著。通过试验揭示该类斜坡失稳机制为:在强震荷载反复作用下,软岩和硬岩产生差异剪切破坏,岩土体沿优势层面下滑受阻,坡脚附近岩土体弯曲隆起,斜坡深层潜在滑面未完全贯通,坡肩震裂松弛岩体在地震的巨大水平惯性力下,向临空面作悬臂梁弯曲倾倒,整个斜坡发生拉裂滑移-下部弯曲-上部倾倒式失稳破坏。

关键词: 汶川地震, 陡倾顺层斜坡, 离心振动台试验, 动力响应, 失稳机制

Abstract: The stability of steep bedding slope is generally better under static force condition, but lots of instable fracture phenomena occurred in this type of slop during “5.12” Wenchuan earthquake. A special dynamic deformation failure mode, toppling deformation, is found in steep soft-hard alternative bedding slope by field investigation. Based on existing knowledge and a failure case, i.e. Shuimogou soft-hard alternative bedding of steep slope in Wenchuan County, Sichuan, the mechanism of toppling deformation and the characteristics of dynamic response of this type of slope under strong earthquake are studied by centrifugal shaking table test. On slope surface, acceleration amplification factor increases first, then decreases, and finally increases with the increase of elevation. The dynamic response shows two peak values at 1/3 of slope height and slope shoulder. At the same horizontal height, the closer to the slope surface, the greater the magnification factor of acceleration, which means that the free face effect of slope rock-soil body is more significant. Experiment reveals the instability mechanism of this slope: under the repeated actions of strong earthquake loads, differential shear failure occurs between soft rock and hard rock, rock-soil body sliding along the dominant layer is hindered, the rock-soil body nearby slope toe bends and uplifts; the potential sliding surfaces are not connected completely, under the tremendous horizontal inertia force of earthquake, shattered rock stratum at slope shoulder generates cantilever beam bending toppling toward free face, so that the entire slope undergoes tension fracture slippage?lower bending?upper toppling instable fracture.

Key words: Wenchuan earthquake, steep bedding slope, centrifugal shaking table test, dynamic response, instability mechanism

中图分类号: 

  • TU 432
[1] 乔向进, 梁庆国, 曹小平, 王丽丽, . 桥隧相连体系隧道洞口段动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2342-2348.
[2] 何静斌, 冯忠居, 董芸秀, 胡海波, 刘 闯, 郭穗柱, 张聪, 武敏, 王振, . 强震区桩−土−断层耦合作用下桩基动力响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2389-2400.
[3] 任洋, 李天斌, 赖林. 强震区隧道洞口段边坡动力响应 特征离心振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1605-1612.
[4] 张卢明, 周勇, 范刚, 蔡红雨, 董云. 强震作用下核安全级反倾层状软岩高陡边坡组合支挡结构抗震性能研究与加固效果评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1740-1749.
[5] 王立安, 赵建昌, 侯小强, 刘生纬, 王作伟. 非均匀饱和半空间的Lamb问题[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1790-1798.
[6] 冯立, 丁选明, 王成龙, 陈志雄. 考虑接缝影响的地下综合管廊振动台模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1295-1304.
[7] 芦苇, 赵冬, 李东波, 毛筱霏. 土遗址全长黏结式锚固系统动力响应解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1377-1387.
[8] 张恒源, 钱德玲, 沈超, 戴启权. 水平和竖向地震作用下液化场地群桩基础 动力响应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 905-914.
[9] 吴琪, 丁选明, 陈志雄, 陈育民, 彭宇, . 不同地震动强度下珊瑚礁砂地基中桩-土-结构 地震响应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 571-580.
[10] 夏 坤, 董林, 蒲小武, 李璐, . 黄土塬地震动响应特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 295-304.
[11] 于一帆, 王平, 王会娟, 许书雅, 郭海涛, . 堆积层滑坡地震动力响应的物理模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 172-180.
[12] 杨文波, 邹涛, 涂玖林, 谷笑旭, 刘雨辰, 晏启祥, 何川. 高速列车振动荷载作用下马蹄形断面隧 道动力响应特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3635-3644.
[13] 姜立春, 罗恩民, 沈彬彬, . 多自由度模型法的立体采空区群爆破 动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2407-2415.
[14] 邹佑学, 王睿, 张建民, . 可液化场地碎石桩复合地基地震动力响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2443-2455.
[15] 史 吏, 王慧萍, 孙宏磊, 潘晓东, . 群桩基础引发饱和地基振动的近似解析解[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1750-1760.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!