岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (5): 1790-1798.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.0591

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    

非均匀饱和半空间的Lamb问题

王立安1,赵建昌1, 2,侯小强1,刘生纬2,王作伟1   

  1. 1. 兰州交通大学 土木工程学院,甘肃 兰州 730070;2. 兰州交通大学 文化遗产保护工程技术研究所,甘肃 兰州 730070
  • 收稿日期:2019-08-19 修回日期:2019-09-06 出版日期:2020-05-11 发布日期:2020-07-08
  • 通讯作者: 赵建昌,男,1962年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土力学及新型预应力混凝土结构方面研究工作。E-mail: 13609382011@163.com E-mail:513173705@qq.com
  • 作者简介:王立安,男,1986年生,博士研究生,工程师,主要从事岩土力学、地基与基础工程方面研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    甘肃省高等学校成果转化基金(No. 2018D-27)

Lamb problem for non-homogeneous saturated half-space

WANG Li-an1, ZHAO Jian-chang1, 2, HOU Xiao-qiang1, LIU Sheng-wei2, WANG Zuo-wei1   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730070, China; 2. Institute of Cultural Heritage Protection Engineering Technology, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730070, China
  • Received:2019-08-19 Revised:2019-09-06 Online:2020-05-11 Published:2020-07-08
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by Gansu Provincial Higher Education Achievement Transformation Fund (2018D-27).

摘要: 基于Biot多孔介质波动理论,建立孔隙率、密度、剪切模量和渗透系数相互耦合且同时沿深度变化的非均匀饱和半空间模型,引入量化的非均匀梯度表征地基非均匀程度。在柱坐标系下构建以土骨架位移和孔隙压力为基本未知量的三维动力控制方程,采用算子运算和Hankel积分变换求解控制方程,推导出简谐集中力作用下半空间地基振动响应的积分解。将所得结果分别退化到均匀饱和半空间和弹性半空间与经典Lamb解做了对比,验证了结果的正确性。利用已有研究结论,给出孔隙率、密度、剪切模量和渗透系数之间的耦合关系式,代入推导结果进行数值计算。分别对水饱和地基和气饱和(干土)地基的动力响应进行分析,给出两类地基在动力作用下的振动位移和孔隙压力分布,并对非均匀性的影响作出分析。结果表明:4参数沿地基深度耦连变化对地基的动力响应产生一定程度影响,振动位移和孔隙压力在地层中的衰减速度由此加快。由于水的黏滞性远大于气体,所以水饱和地基中的振动衰减更快。非均匀程度越高,耦合效应的影响越明显。

关键词: 非均匀, 饱和半空间, 耦连变化, 动力响应, 梯度, Hankel积分变换

Abstract: Based on Biot wave theory of porous media, a model was established for non-homogeneous saturated half-space, in which porosity, density, shear modulus and coefficient of permeability were coupled with each other and varied along the depth at the same time. A three-dimensional (3D) dynamic control equation with soil skeleton displacement and pore pressure as the fundamental unknowns is constructed in the cylindrical coordinate system. Operator operation and Hankel integral transformation are used to solving the control equation, and the product decomposition of the vibration response of the half-space under the action of simple harmonic concentrated forces is obtained. The results obtained in this paper are reduced to homogeneous saturated half-space and elastic half-space, respectively, and compared with the classical Lamb solution, the accuracy of results is also verified. Based on the existing results, the coupling relations among porosity, density, shear modulus and coefficient of permeability are given and substituted into the derived results for numerical calculation. The dynamic responses of water-saturated foundation and gas saturated foundation (dry soil) are analyzed respectively. The effect of non-uniform gradient on the calculated results is also investigated. The results show that the coupling of four parameters along the depth of the foundation has a certain influence on the dynamic response of the foundation, and the attenuation rate of vibration displacement and pore pressure in the formation is accelerated. Since the viscosity of water is much higher than that of gas, the vibration attenuation in the water-saturated ground is much faster. The higher the degree of non-uniformity, the more obvious the influence of coupling effect.

Key words: non-homogeneous, saturated half space, coupling effect, dynamic response, gradient, Hankel transform

中图分类号: 

  • TU 470
[1] 李福秀, 吴志坚, 严武建, 赵多银, . 基于振动台试验的黄土塬边斜坡 动力响应特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 2880-2890.
[2] 吝曼卿, 张兰, 刘夕奇, 夏元友, 张电吉, 彭亚利, . 梯度应力作用下模型试件的岩爆破坏细观分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 2984-2992.
[3] 庄妍, 李劭邦, 崔晓艳, 董晓强, 王康宇, . 高铁荷载下桩承式路基动力响应及土拱效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 3119-3130.
[4] 乔向进, 梁庆国, 曹小平, 王丽丽, . 桥隧相连体系隧道洞口段动力响应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2342-2348.
[5] 何静斌, 冯忠居, 董芸秀, 胡海波, 刘 闯, 郭穗柱, 张聪, 武敏, 王振, . 强震区桩−土−断层耦合作用下桩基动力响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2389-2400.
[6] 王立安, 赵建昌, 余云燕, . 瑞利波在非均匀饱和地基中的传播特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1983-1990.
[7] 任洋, 李天斌, 赖林. 强震区隧道洞口段边坡动力响应 特征离心振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1605-1612.
[8] 张卢明, 周勇, 范刚, 蔡红雨, 董云. 强震作用下核安全级反倾层状软岩高陡边坡组合支挡结构抗震性能研究与加固效果评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1740-1749.
[9] 冯立, 丁选明, 王成龙, 陈志雄. 考虑接缝影响的地下综合管廊振动台模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1295-1304.
[10] 芦苇, 赵冬, 李东波, 毛筱霏. 土遗址全长黏结式锚固系统动力响应解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1377-1387.
[11] 张恒源, 钱德玲, 沈超, 戴启权. 水平和竖向地震作用下液化场地群桩基础 动力响应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 905-914.
[12] 宋义敏, 张 悦, 许海亮, 王亚飞, 贺志杰. 基于非均匀特征的岩石蠕滑与黏滑变形演化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 363-371.
[13] 吴琪, 丁选明, 陈志雄, 陈育民, 彭宇, . 不同地震动强度下珊瑚礁砂地基中桩-土-结构 地震响应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 571-580.
[14] 陈士海, 宫嘉辰, 胡帅伟, . 爆破荷载下围岩及支护锚杆动力响应特征 模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(12): 3910-3918.
[15] 田大浪, 谢强, 宁越, 傅翔, 张建华, . 间断级配砂砾石土的渗透变形试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(11): 3663-3670.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[2] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[3] 张明义,刘俊伟,于秀霞. 饱和软黏土地基静压管桩承载力时间效应试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3005 -3008 .
[4] 杨 坤,周创兵,王同旭. 多种外界随机荷载综合作用下的坝坡风险评价[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3057 -3062 .
[5] 冷伍明,杨 奇,刘庆潭,聂如松. 软基高桥台桩-土相互作用计算新方法研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3079 -3085 .
[6] 吴 亮,钟冬望,卢文波. 空气间隔装药爆炸冲击荷载作用下混凝土损伤分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3109 -3114 .
[7] 赵明华,刘小平,黄立葵. 降雨作用下路基裂隙渗流分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3122 -3126 .
[8] 张家发,定培中,张 伟,胡智京. 水布垭面板堆石坝垫层料渗透与渗透变形特性试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3145 -3150 .
[9] 周晓杰,介玉新,李广信1. 基于渗流和管流耦合的管涌数值模拟[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3154 -3158 .
[10] 蒋小伟,万 力,王旭升,武 雄,程惠红. 利用RQD估算岩体不同深度的平均渗透系数和平均变形模量[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3163 -3167 .