›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (11): 3921-3928.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.0666

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

冲击荷载下玄武岩纤维水泥土吸能及分形特征

马芹永1, 2，高常辉2   

  1. 1. 安徽理工大学 矿山地下工程教育部工程研究中心，安徽 淮南 232001；2. 安徽理工大学 土木建筑学院，安徽 淮南 232001
  • 收稿日期:2017-04-10 出版日期:2018-11-10 发布日期:2018-11-15
  • 通讯作者: 高常辉，男，1992年生，硕士研究生，主要从事水泥土材料方面的研究工作。E-mail：gaoch1992@126.com E-mail:qymaah@126.com
  • 作者简介:马芹永，男，1964年生，博士，教授，博士生导师，主要从事岩土工程方面的研究工作

Energy absorption and fractal characteristics of basalt fiber-reinforced cement- soil under impact loads

MA Qin-yong1, 2, GAO Chang-hui2   

  1. 1. Research Center of Mine Underground Engineering, Ministry of Education, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, Anhui 232001, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, Anhui 232001, China
  • Received:2017-04-10 Online:2018-11-10 Published:2018-11-15

PDF (Chinese)

285

摘要： 为研究玄武岩纤维对水泥土冲击破坏过程中能量吸收及碎块块度分布特征的影响，采用Φ50 mm变截面霍普金森压杆（split Hopkinson pressure bar，简称SHPB）试验装置对不同玄武岩纤维掺量的水泥土进行了冲击压缩和动态劈裂试验，分析了冲击荷载作用下玄武岩纤维掺量与水泥土吸收能、破坏形态和分形维数 的关系，试验结果表明：随着玄武岩纤维掺量的增加，水泥土吸收能呈先增大后减小的趋势，超过最佳掺量后，由于纤维-纤维薄弱面的存在，水泥土吸收能减少；冲击破坏后水泥土破碎块度分布是具有统计意义上的分形，冲击压缩试验中水泥土破碎块度平均粒径随玄武岩纤维掺量的增加而不断增大，对应的 值总体上呈现不断减小的趋势；在动态劈裂试验中，玄武岩纤维掺量在0～2.0%范围内，水泥土破碎块度平均粒径呈现上升趋势， 值不断减小，玄武岩纤维掺量超过2.0%后，平均粒径有所降低，对应 值增大。玄武岩纤维水泥土吸收能和 值之间有着密切的联系，冲击压缩试验中，吸收能在分形维数为2.20～2.26范围内呈先增大后减小的趋势，而在动态劈裂试验中，吸收能在分形维数为1.85～2.20范围内总体呈现下降趋势，两者具有一定的负相关性；合适掺量的玄武岩纤维对水泥土动态特性起着积极作用，通过试验得出玄武岩纤维的合适掺量为1.5%～2.0%。

关键词: 玄武岩纤维, 水泥土, 霍普金森压杆（SHPB）, 吸收能, 分形维数, 破碎块度

Abstract: To study the effects of basalt fiber on energy absorption and fractal characteristics of cement-soil, a series of impact compressive tests and dynamic tensile tests was conducted on cement-soil with different basalt fiber contents by using a Φ50 mm Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar (SHPB) apparatus. The relationship between the basalt fiber content and three factors (i.e., energy absorption, failure mode and fractal dimension ( ) of cement-soil) was analyzed. The test results show that energy absorption firstly increased and then decreased with the inclusion of basalt fiber, and due to the existence of weak-surface made by excess basalt fiber, the energy absorption capacity was unresponsive to an increase of basalt fiber content when the basalt fiber content was more than the optimum content. The fragment-size distribution of cement-soil had a fractal property with statistical sense of self-similarity. In the impact compressive test, mean diameter of fragments increased with the increase of basalt fiber content but its appropriate had a decreasing trend. In the dynamic tensile test, when the basalt fiber content was from 0 to 2.0%, the mean diameter of fragments increased and the value of decreased. However, the mean diameter of fragments decreased and increased when more than 2.0% of basalt fiber was added. Also, there was a close relationship between the energy absorption and . In the impact compressive test, energy absorption firstly increased and then decreased when was from 2.20 to 2.26. When was from 1.85 to 2.20, the energy absorption continuously decreased in the dynamic tensile test, which shows a negative correlation between and energy absorption. The optimum content of basalt fiber plays a positive role in the dynamic properties of cement-soil, therefore, this study presents a suggestion that the optimum content of basalt fiber is 1.5% to 2.0%.

Key words: basalt fiber, cement-soil, split Hopkinson pressure bar (SHPB), energy absorption, fractal dimension, broken fragments

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411
[1] 邹先坚, 王益腾, 王川婴. 钻孔图像中岩石结构面三维形貌特征及 优势抗滑方向研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 290-298.
[2] 张振, 张朝, 叶观宝, 王萌, 肖彦, 程义, . 劲芯水泥土桩承载路堤渐进式失稳破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2122-2131.
[3] 褚福永, 朱俊高, 翁厚洋, 叶洋帆. 粗粒料级配缩尺后最大干密度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1599-1604.
[4] 刘功勋, 李威, 洪国军, 张坤勇, CHEN Xiu-han, 施绍刚, RUTTEN Tom. 大比尺切削模型试验条件下砂岩破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1211-1218.
[5] 孙红, 宋春雨, 滕慕薇, 葛修润. 加荷条件下软黏土的孔隙演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 141-146.
[6] 赵国彦, 李振阳, 吴浩, 王恩杰, 刘雷磊. 含非贯通裂隙砂岩的动力破坏特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 73-81.
[7] 田军, 卢高明, 冯夏庭, 李元辉, 张希巍. 主要造岩矿物微波敏感性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2066-2074.
[8] 张小燕, 蔡燕燕, 周浩燃, 杨 洋, 李玉龙, . 珊瑚砂大剪切应变下的剪切特性和分形维数[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 610-615.
[9] 肖晓春, 樊玉峰, 吴迪, 丁鑫, 王磊, 赵宝友, . 组合煤岩破坏过程能量耗散特征及冲击危险评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4203-4212.
[10] 孟庆山, 范 超, 曾卫星, 余克服, . 南沙群岛珊瑚礁灰岩的动态力学性能试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 183-190.
[11] 曾 寅, 刘建锋, 周志威, 吴 池, 李志成, . 盐岩单轴蠕变声发射特征及损伤演化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 207-215.
[12] 陈 军, 梁文鹏, 应宏伟, . 大直径水泥土锚索合理间距的试验与数值研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 374-380.
[13] 向 高，刘建锋，李天一，徐杨梦迪，邓朝福，吴 池，. 基于声发射的盐岩变形破坏过程的分形与损伤特征研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2905-2912.
[14] 王闵闵，鹿 群，郭少龙，高 萌，沈仲涛，. 循环荷载作用下纤维水泥土动力特性[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1753-1760.
[15] 王建国，杨 阳，郭延辉，刘 洋，黄永辉，王立娜,. 高应变率下饱水花岗岩动力学特性的低温效应[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 163-169.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 《岩土力学》编辑部
地址：湖北武汉武昌小洪山中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所(430071)　邮编：200042　电话：027-87198484, 87199252, 87199253, 87198752　E-mail: ytlx@whrsm.ac.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发