岩土力学 ›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (12): 4413-4420.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.0810

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

气泡混合轻质土试样制备研究

周云东1,2,王 勇1,2,黎 冰3,徐佳辉1,2,刘萌成4,Ali H Mahfouz5   

  1. 1. 河海大学 岩土力学与堤坝工程教育部重点实验室,江苏 南京 210098;2. 河海大学 江苏省岩土工程技术工程研究中心,江苏 南京 210098;3. 东南大学 土木工程学院,江苏 南京 210096;4. 浙江工业大学 建筑工程学院,浙江 杭州 310014; 5. 苏伊士大学 石油与采矿工程学院,埃及 苏伊士 43721
  • 收稿日期:2017-04-26 出版日期:2018-12-11 发布日期:2018-12-31
  • 通讯作者: 黎冰,男,1981年生,博士,副教授,主要从事新型土工材料和海洋岩土方面的研究工作。E-mail: lbershui@seu.edu.cn E-mail:ydzhou@hhu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:周云东,男,1975年生,博士,副教授,主要从事地基处理、监测及土动力学的教学研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51578145,No.51378472)。

Study of the preparation of air-foam treated lightweight soil samples

ZHOU Yun-dong1, 2, WANG Yong1, 2, LI Bing3, XU Jia-hui1, 2, LIU Meng-cheng4, ALI H Mahfouz5   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Geomechanics and Embankment Engineering, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China; 2. Jiangsu Research Center for Geotechnical Engineering Technology, Hohai University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210098, China; 3. School of Civil Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, Jiangsu 210096, China; 4. College of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou, Zhejiang 310014, China; 5. Faculty of Petroleum and Mining Engineering, Suez University, Suez 43721, Egypt
  • Received:2017-04-26 Online:2018-12-11 Published:2018-12-31
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51578145, 51378472).

摘要: 由于气泡消泡的缘故,室内制备和现场浇筑气泡混合轻质土时存在塌陷问题。为分析和解决该问题,以砂土为原料土,开展了不同温差、湿度和掺砂与否条件下3种密度气泡混合轻质土的制备试验,并测定了各试样的高度和强度,基于热力学理论分析了3种因素对试样制备和强度的影响规律。试验结果表明,试样制备时温度与养护温度之间的温差是影响气泡混合轻质土胀缩性的决定性因素,轻质土中的气泡含量越高,受温差影响越大,通过控制温差即可解决塌陷问题;湿度和掺砂与否对气泡混合轻质土的试样制备影响不明显,但是湿度高会延长试样脱模时间以及影响试样的完整性;温差和温度共同影响气泡混合轻质土的早期强度,其中温差主要影响试样密实度,温度主要影响水泥水化反应速率。试验结果可为气泡混合轻质土制备和施工时间点选择提供借鉴。

关键词: 气泡混合轻质土, 温差, 湿度, 强度

Abstract: In consequence of froth breaking, there is a caved problem about air-foam treated lightweight soil after casting indoor and in-site. To analyze and solve the problem, a series of samples preparation experiments on sand were conducted on air-foam treated lightweight soil with three specific densities under different conditions, i.e., temperature, humidity and sand mixing or not. Meanwhile, the height and strength of samples were measured. Based on the thermodynamics theory, the effects of three factors on the preparation and strength of the samples were analyzed using experimental data. The results show that temperature difference is the decisive factor affecting the shrinkage and expansion of air-foam treated lightweight soil. The temperature difference impact greatly in sample of high bubble content. Humidity and sand mixing barely affect sample preparation while the mold unloading time of samples will be extended and the integrity of samples will be affected when ambient humidity becomes higher. Early strength of samples is influenced by temperature and temperature difference. temperature difference mainly affects the density of samples, and the temperature mainly affects the rate of hydration reaction of cement. The results of this study provide reference for the preparation and construction time of air-foam treated lightweight soil.

Key words: air-foam treated lightweight soil, temperature difference, humidity, strength

中图分类号: 

  • TU443
[1] 徐刚, 张春会, 于永江, . 综放工作面覆岩破断和压架的试验研究及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 106-114.
[2] 桂跃, 吴承坤, 赵振兴, 刘声钧, 刘锐, 张秋敏. 微生物分解有机质作用对泥炭土工程性质的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 147-155.
[3] 刘杰, 杨玉婳, 姚海林, 卢正, 岳婵, . 基于不同改性方法的分散性黏土处治试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 163-170.
[4] 邹先坚, 王益腾, 王川婴. 钻孔图像中岩石结构面三维形貌特征及 优势抗滑方向研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 290-298.
[5] 李丽华, 余肖婷, 肖衡林, 马强, 刘一鸣, 杨 星, . 稻壳灰加筋土力学性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2168-2178.
[6] 高玮, 胡承杰, 贺天阳, 陈新, 周聪, 崔爽, . 基于统计强度理论的破裂岩体本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2179-2188.
[7] 袁庆盟, 孔亮, 赵亚鹏, . 考虑水合物填充和胶结效应的深海能源土 弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2304-2312.
[8] 陈昊, 胡小荣. 非饱和土三剪强度准则及验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2380-2388.
[9] 吴再海, 纪洪广, 姜海强, 齐兆军, 寇云鹏, . 尾砂胶结含盐冻结充填体力学特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1874-1880.
[10] 文伟, 赖远明, 尤哲敏, 李积锋, . 基于Pitzer离子模型的盐渍非饱和土孔隙 相对湿度计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1944-1952.
[11] 瑜璐, 杨庆, 杨钢, 张金利. 塑性极限分析鱼雷锚锚尖贯入阻力[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1953-1962.
[12] 刘新宇, 张先伟, 岳好真, 孔令伟, 徐超, . 花岗岩残积土动态冲击性能的SHPB试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2001-2008.
[13] 刘海峰, 朱长歧, 汪稔, 王新志, 崔翔, 王天民, . 礁灰岩-混凝土界面剪切特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1540-1548.
[14] 谈云志, 柯睿, 陈君廉, 吴军, 邓永锋. 碱溶液预降解淤泥有机质的效果与机制讨论[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1567-1572.
[15] 张茂础, 盛谦, 崔臻, 马亚丽娜, 周光新. 岩石材料抗拉强度与劈裂节理面形貌的 加载速率效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1169-1178.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!