岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (7): 2380-2388.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1519

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

非饱和土三剪强度准则及验证

陈昊,胡小荣   

  1. 南昌大学 建筑工程学院,江西 南昌 330031
  • 收稿日期:2019-09-02 修回日期:2019-12-16 出版日期:2020-07-10 发布日期:2020-09-13
  • 作者简介:陈昊,男,1994年生,硕士研究生,主要从事非饱和土强度方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 10862004,No. 11362016)。

Triple-shear failure criteria and experimental verification for unsaturated soils

CHEN Hao, HU Xiao-rong   

  1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Nanchang University, Nanchang, Jiangxi 330031, China
  • Received:2019-09-02 Revised:2019-12-16 Online:2020-07-10 Published:2020-09-13
  • Contact: 胡小荣,男,1964年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土本构理论及其工程应用的科研工作。E-mail: huxiaorong@ncu.edu.cn E-mail:879977416@qq.com
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (10862004, 11362016).

摘要: 基于材料三剪强度准则和非饱和土力学特性,提出了非饱和土的单应力变量和双应力变量三剪强度准则,并对其做了特征分析。分析表明,通过改变准则中的主应力影响系数b,所提准则就可以对其他强度准则进行非线性近似表达。在π平面的极限线中,所提强度准则覆盖了由内边界的单剪强度准则到外边界的三剪统一强度准则之间的所有外凸区域。因此,其适用于各种复杂应力状态下的非饱和土体,也能反映非饱和土单轴抗拉抗压强度不等的特征。另外,还用其他文献的真三轴试验数据对所提准则做了试验验证,其中,非饱和黏土砂的真三轴试验值与中主应力影响系数b=0.6时的三剪强度准则预测值吻合较好,双应力变量下准则的预测值比单应力变量下的预测值更符合试验值;非饱和黄土真三轴试验值与中主应力影响系数b=0.2时的三剪强度准则预测值吻合较好,两种应力变量下的三剪强度准则预测值差别较小。

关键词: 非饱和土, 三剪强度准则, 单应力变量, 双应力变量, 试验验证

Abstract: Based on the triple-shear failure criterion of materials and the mechanical properties of unsaturated soils, the triple-shear failure criteria of the single stress variable and the double stress variable for unsaturated soils are put forward, and their characteristics are analyzed. The results show that the existing failure criteria for unsaturated soils can be interpreted approximately with the new criteria by changing the influence coefficient b of the principal stress. For loci on the π plane, the failure criteria proposed in this paper cover all the convex regions from the inner boundary of the single-shear failure criterion to the outer boundary of the triple-shear failure criterion. Therefore, the new criteria are suitable for unsaturated soils under various complex stress states and can reflect the inequality in uniaxial tension and compression of the unsaturated soils. In addition, several true triaxial test results reported by other researchers are adopted to verify the proposed criteria. For the unsaturated clayey sands, the true triaxial test results were found in good agreement with the values predicted by the triple-shear failure criteria of the single stress variable and the double stress variable when the influence coefficient of the principal stress b=0.6, and the predicted values given by the double stress variable criterion are more consistent than that of the single stress variable criterion. For the unsaturated loess, true triaxial test values are also in good agreement with the values predicted by the triple-shear failure criteria when the influence coefficient of principal stress b=0.2, and the difference is smaller between the two kinds of triple-failure failure criteria than that of the clayey sands.

Key words: unsaturated soils, triple-shear failure criteria, single stress variable, double stress variable, experimental verifications

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411
[1] 宋朝阳, 赵成刚, 韦昌富, 马田田, . 非饱和土平均粒间应力的计算及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2665-2674.
[2] 杨志浩, 岳祖润, 冯怀平, . 非饱和粉土路基内水分迁移规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2241-2251.
[3] 文伟, 赖远明, 尤哲敏, 李积锋, . 基于Pitzer离子模型的盐渍非饱和土孔隙 相对湿度计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1944-1952.
[4] 陶帅, 董毅, 韦昌富, . 环境湿度可控的土体小应变刚度试验系统[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2132-2142.
[5] 柳鸿博, 周凤玺, 岳国栋, 郝磊超. 非饱和土中热弹性波的传播特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1613-1624.
[6] 孙银磊, 汤连生, 刘洁, . 非饱和土微观结构与粒间吸力的研究进展[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1095-1122.
[7] 李潇旋, 李涛, 李舰, 张涛. 循环荷载下非饱和结构性黏土的弹塑性双面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1153-1160.
[8] 李华, 李同录, 江睿君, 范江文. 基于滤纸法的非饱和渗透性曲线测试[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 895-904.
[9] 程涛, 晏克勤, 胡仁杰, 郑俊杰, 张欢, 陈合龙, 江志杰, 刘强, . 非饱和土拟二维平面应变固结问题的解析计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 453-460.
[10] 邓子千, 陈嘉帅, 王建伟, 刘小文, . 基于SFG模型的统一屈服面本构模型与试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 527-534.
[11] 李潇旋, 李涛, 彭丽云, . 控制吸力循环荷载下非饱和黏性土 的弹塑性双面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 552-560.
[12] 程昊, 唐辉明, 吴琼, 雷国平. 一种考虑水力滞回效应的非饱和土弹塑性扩展 剑桥本构模型显式算法有限元实现[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 676-686.
[13] 蔡国庆, 吴天驰, 王亚南, 刘祎, 李舰, 赵成刚, . 双孔结构非饱和压实土微观结构演化模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(11): 3583-3590.
[14] 陈可, 曹文贵, 陈贺. 基于孔隙胀缩的土−水特征曲线滞后增量模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(10): 3236-3244.
[15] 刘祎, 蔡国庆, 李舰, 赵成刚, . 一个统一描述饱和−非饱和土温度效应的 热−弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(10): 3279-3288.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[4] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[5] 张明义,刘俊伟,于秀霞. 饱和软黏土地基静压管桩承载力时间效应试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3005 -3008 .
[6] 吴 亮,钟冬望,卢文波. 空气间隔装药爆炸冲击荷载作用下混凝土损伤分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3109 -3114 .
[7] 周晓杰,介玉新,李广信1. 基于渗流和管流耦合的管涌数值模拟[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3154 -3158 .
[8] 吴昌瑜,张 伟,李思慎,朱国胜. 减压井机械淤堵机制与防治方法试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3181 -3187 .
[9] 崔皓东,朱岳明. 二滩高拱坝坝基渗流场的反演分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3194 -3199 .
[10] 赵成刚,蔡国庆. 非饱和土广义有效应力原理[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3232 -3236 .