›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (11): 4117-4124.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.0836

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

遗址土劣化进程中微观结构变化的类比研究

陈 毅1, 2,张虎元1, 2,杨 龙1, 2   

  1. 1. 兰州大学 西部灾害与环境力学教育部重点实验室,甘肃 兰州 730000;2. 兰州大学 土木工程与力学学院,甘肃 兰州 730000
  • 收稿日期:2017-04-28 出版日期:2018-11-10 发布日期:2018-11-15
  • 通讯作者: 张虎元,男,1963年生,博士,教授,主要从事环境岩土工程相关研究。E-mail: zhanghuyuan@lzu.edu.cn E-mail:cheny_08@lzu.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:陈毅,男,1990年生,博士研究生,主要从事环境岩土工程相关研究。
  • 基金资助:
    兰州大学西部灾害与环境力学教育部重点实验室开放基金项目资助(No. 201405)

Analogy study on evolution of microstructure of earthen monument during natural weathering process

CHEN Yi1, 2, ZHANG Hu-yuan1, 2, YANG Long1, 2   

  1. 1. Key Laboratory of Mechanics on Disaster and Environment in Western China of Ministry of Education, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730000, China
  • Received:2017-04-28 Online:2018-11-10 Published:2018-11-15
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Open Fund of Key Laboratory of Mechanics on Disaster and Environment in Western China (Lanzhou University), Ministry of Education(201405).

摘要: 长期的风化会使遗址土体劣化,进而威胁到遗址本体的安全,但在自然条件下这一演化过程尚不明确。遗址土体微观结构的变化是该过程的重要体现,研究选取风化条件近似而暴露时间不同的黄土质边坡作为类比对象,采用扫描电镜法(SEM)和压汞法(MIP)分别对表部以及内部土样的微观孔隙结构进行观察和量测。试验结果表明,表部土体微观结构的变化程度大于内部土体,并呈现一定的规律性;与内部土体相比,表部土体的土颗粒排列为致密的叠片状;其孔径分布为双峰模式,团聚体内孔隙占比较大;随着风化时间的增长,表部土体的孔隙总体积和表面分形维数逐渐减小,导致孔壁粗糙程度降低,减小了颗粒间的摩擦,在宏观上容易诱发土体表层的剥离损耗或其他病害。

关键词: 土遗址, 微结构, 风化, 孔隙分维, 扫描电镜(SEM), 压汞MIP

Abstract: The long-time weathering causes significant deterioration of earthen building materials, which poses a great threat to the durability of earthen monuments. This process, however, keeps unknown under the real weathering conditions because of their complexity and large time scale. Soil micro-structure changes with the natural exposure and its evolution is an important feature characterizing the deterioration process. The loess road cuts, which were exposed to similar weathering for different years, were selected as analogy model to capture the evolution of micro-structures of undisturbed soil samples from surface and internal parts, respectively. Scanning electronic microscope (SEM) was used to observe the fabric and texture of soil samples. Mercury intrusion porosimetry (MIP) was used to measure the pore size distribution (PSD) quantitatively. The experimental results show that the micro-structure of surface soil changes much more significantly with weathering time compared to that of internal soil. The fabric of surface soil is in lamellar form and its PSDs are bimodal (i.e., inter-aggregate pores and intra-aggregate pores). The inter-aggregate pores volume accounts for a larger proportion in the surface soil and shows a decreasing trend with weathering time. Fractal analysis of pore surface indicates that building age has a tendency to decrease the irregularity and roughness of micro-pore walls in the surface soil samples, which could lead to a reduction in friction forces between soil aggregates or particles. Consequently, surface weathering, like crusts or peeling off, or other diseases would be engaged at the macro-scale.

Key words: earthen monument, micro-structure, weathering, fractal dimension, scanning electronic microscope (SEM), mercury intrusion porosimetry MIP

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411.92
[1] 周翠英, 梁彦豪, 刘春辉, 刘镇, . 天然红层风化土成膜试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 132-138.
[2] 王逢睿, 焦大丁, 刘平, 孙博, 王家杰, 杨鸿锐, . 硫酸盐对麦积山砂砾岩风化影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2199-2206.
[3] 芦苇, 赵冬, 李东波, 毛筱霏. 土遗址全长黏结式锚固系统动力响应解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1377-1387.
[4] 金青, 王艺霖, 崔新壮, 王成军, 张珂, 刘正银, . 拉拔作用下土工合成材料在风化料-废弃轮胎 橡胶颗粒轻质土中的变形行为研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 408-418.
[5] 和法国, 吕燃, 粟华忠, 周瑾, 张景科, 王南, . SH材料加固夯筑遗址土耐久性试验及机理研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 297-307.
[6] 赵波, 张广清, 唐梅荣, 庄建满, 林灿坤, . 长期注水对致密砂岩油藏岩石力学 性质影响机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3344-3350.
[7] 崔凯, 黄井镜, 谌文武, 王东华, 韩宁, . 生石灰为掺料的土遗址锚固浆液选型和性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2183-2191.
[8] 张景科, 单婷婷, 王玉超, 王 南, 樊 孟, 赵林毅, . 土遗址锚固土体-浆体(CGN+C)界面力学性能[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 903-912.
[9] 任克彬, 王 博, 李新明, 尹 松, . 毛细水干湿循环作用下土遗址的强度特性 与孔隙分布特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 962-970.
[10] 谌文武, 张起勇, 刘宏伟, . SH固土剂在遗址土中的渗透注浆扩散规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 429-435.
[11] 崔凯, 冯飞, 谌文武, 汪小海, 程富强, . 生石灰为掺料的土遗址裂隙注浆浆液结石体 力学兼容性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4627-4636.
[12] 丁瑜, 陈晓斌, 张家生, 贾羽, . 风化红砂岩残积土路基瞬态饱和区动态水压力 特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4740-4750.
[13] 费锁柱, 谭晓慧, 孙志豪, 杜林枫. 基于微结构模拟的土体自相关距离分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4751-4758.
[14] 庄心善, 王俊翔, 王 康, 李 凯, 胡 智. 风化砂改良膨胀土的动力特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 149-156.
[15] 朱振南, 田 红, 董楠楠, 窦 斌, 陈 劲, 张 宇, 王炳红, . 高温花岗岩遇水冷却后物理力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 169-176.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!