岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (11): 4459-4466.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1492

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

采动诱发应力主轴偏转对断层稳定性影响分析

卢志国1, 2, 3，鞠文君1, 2，赵毅鑫3，王浩3, 4，郑建伟1,2，刘爱卿1, 2   

  1. 1. 煤炭科学研究总院 开采研究分院，北京 100013；2. 天地科技股份有限公司 开采设计事业部，北京 100013； 3. 中国矿业大学（北京）资源与安全工程学院，北京 100083；4 河南理工大学 能源科学与工程学院，河南 焦作 454000
  • 收稿日期:2018-08-13 出版日期:2019-11-11 发布日期:2019-12-01
  • 通讯作者: 赵毅鑫，男，1977年生，博士，教授，博士生导师，从事岩石力学与采矿工程方面的研究工作。E-mail：zhaoyx@cumtb.edu.cn E-mail:cumtblzg@163.com
  • 作者简介:卢志国，男，1992年生，博士研究生，主要从事矿井动力灾害及其防治等方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目（No. 2016YFC0801401，No. 2016YFC0600708，No. 2017YFC0804205）；国家自然科学基金面上项目（No. 51774185）；中央高校基本科研业务费项目（No. 2009QM01）。

Analysis of the mining induced stress rotation influence on fault stability

LU Zhi-guo1, 2, 3, JU Wen-jun1, 2, ZHAO Yi-xin3, WANG Hao3, 4, ZHENG Jian-wei1, 2, LIU Ai-qing1, 2   

  1. 1. Coal Mining and Designing Branch, China Coal Research Institute, Beijing 100013, China; 2. Coal Mining and Designing Department, Tiandi Science and Technology Co., Ltd., Beijing 100013, China; 3. School of Resource and Safety Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China; 4. School of Energy Science and Engineering, Henan Polytechnic University, Jiaozuo, Henan 454000, China
  • Received:2018-08-13 Online:2019-11-11 Published:2019-12-01
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key R&D Projects (2016YFC0801401, 2016YFC0600708, 2017YFC0804205), the National Natural Science Foundation of China(51774185) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central University (2009QM01).

PDF (Chinese)

178

摘要： 为探究上、下盘不同开采顺序对断层稳定性影响，基于压力拱理论提出应力偏转概念，运用FLAC3D数值方法，模拟工作面分别从断层上盘和下盘向断层推进的过程，分析接触面应力状态和演化规律，验证采动诱发应力偏转，并与断层损伤变量及其增速进行对比分析。研究表明，工作面自上、下盘不同方向靠近断层，顶板主应力起始偏转位置分别为距离断层120 m和40 m处，相差80 m，且下盘最大偏转角是上盘工作面的1.68倍；断层损伤变量的启滑点分别距断层130 m和40 m，下盘工作面相对上盘工作面提前90 m，二者良好的对应关系表明应力偏转与断层滑移失稳显著相关。采动诱发应力偏转产生附加应力概念可以很好解释上、下盘工作面断层稳定性差异，为断层保护煤柱留设及工作面过断层防灾措施制定提供新思路。

关键词: 开采扰动, 应力偏转, 附加应力, 断层滑移

Abstract: To explore the influence of different mining sequences on the fault stability, this paper put forward the hypothesis of stress rotation based on pressure arch theory. Firstly, a numerical model was set up to simulate the process of working face passing through the fault from the hanging wall and footwall to the fault. And then it analyzed the stress state and evolution law of contact surface, and verified the stress rotation induced by mining. Finally, comparative analysis of the fault damage variables and their growth rates was carried in this paper. The results show that during the propulsion process of working face from different directions of hanging wall and footwall of fault, the distance between start position of principal stress rotation in roof and fault is 120 m and 40 m, respectively. The maximum value of principal stress deflection angle when the working face located at footwall is 1.68 times than the value when located at hanging wall. The starting slip points of fault damage variables are 130 m and 40 m from fault, respectively. The fine correspondence between them indicates that stress rotation is significantly related to fault slip instability. The caption of additional stress induced by stress rotation can well explain the difference of fault stability due to different mining sequences, and provide new ideas for the design of fault coal pillar and disaster prevention measures.

Key words: mining disturbance, stress rotation, additional stress, fault slip

中图分类号: 

  • TD 313
[1] 童星, 袁静, 姜叶翔, 刘兴旺, 李瑛, . 基于Mindlin解的基坑分层卸荷附加应力计算 及回弹变形的多因素影响分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2432-2440.
[2] 王青元, 刘杰, 王培涛, 刘飞, . 冲击扰动诱发蠕变岩石加速失稳破坏试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 781-788.
[3] 郎瑞卿, 杨爱武, 闫澍旺, . 修正等应变假定下刚性桩复合地基固结特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 813-822.
[4] 艾希, 冷伍明, 徐方, 张期树, 翟斌, . 新型预应力路基水平附加应力计算的图表法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 253-266.
[5] 冷伍明, 张期树, 徐方, 聂如松, 杨奇, 艾希, . 新型预应力路基坡面法向附加应力扩散规律分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3987-4000.
[6] 周 勇，令永强，杨校辉, . 考虑附加应力作用的桩锚支护结构稳定性与位移关系研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2913-2921.
[7] 赖丰文，陈福全，万梁龙,. 考虑不完全土拱效应的浅层地基竖向应力计算[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2546-2554.
[8] 荣腾龙，周宏伟，王路军，任伟光，郭依宝，. 开采扰动下考虑损伤破裂的深部煤体渗透率模型研究[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 3983-3992.
[9] 何 团，毛德兵，黄志增，孙晓冬，张学亮, . 特厚煤层区段防水煤柱稳定性评价及保护技术研究[J]. , 2017, 38(4): 1148-1153.
[10] 王新泉 ，张 强 ，张世民 ，崔允亮 ，周星德,. 考虑异形效应Y形桩端阻力产生的附加应力研究[J]. , 2016, 37(5): 1268-1280.
[11] 许锡昌，陈善雄，姜领发. 斜坡地基附加应力分布规律模型试验及数值模拟[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 267-273.
[12] 张 瑜 ，吴江斌 ，蔡永昌，. 考虑桩径和桩侧摩阻力分布的改进Geddes 桩基沉降分析方法[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 406-412.
[13] 侯 娟 ，张孟喜 ，张陶陶 ，戴治恒，. 横-竖立体加筋地基中附加应力的分析计算[J]. , 2015, 36(S2): 702-708.
[14] 赖汉江 ，郑俊杰 ，章荣军 ，张 军 ，崔明娟，. 桩承式路堤土拱形成及荷载传递机制离散元分析[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 646-650.
[15] 廖智强，刘根保. 附加应力的概率式解答[J]. , 2015, 36(8): 2223-2227.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!
版权所有 © 《岩土力学》编辑部
地址：湖北武汉武昌小洪山中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所(430071)　邮编：200042　电话：027-87198484, 87199252, 87199253, 87198752　E-mail: ytlx@whrsm.ac.cn
本系统由北京玛格泰克科技发展有限公司设计开发