›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (S2): 267-273.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2015.S2.035

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

斜坡地基附加应力分布规律模型试验及数值模拟

许锡昌,陈善雄,姜领发   

  1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2014-02-26 出版日期:2015-08-31 发布日期:2018-06-14
  • 作者简介:许锡昌,男,1972年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事特殊土工程特性及地基基础方面的研究工作

Experimental study and numerical simulation on additional stress distribution of foundation adjacent to slopes

XU Xi-chang, CHEN Shan-xiong, JIANG Ling-fa   

  1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China
  • Received:2014-02-26 Online:2015-08-31 Published:2018-06-14

摘要: 不少山区输电线路的铁塔基础都建在斜坡上,研究斜坡地基内附加应力的分布规律很有必要。采用室内模型试验和数值模拟相结合的方法,研究了临坡距对斜坡地基附加应力分布及扩散规律的影响。研究成果表明,当临坡距小于安全距离时,地基附加应力随临坡距的增大而增大,并在基础两侧具有显著的非对称性;当临坡距超过安全距离时,附加应力逐渐趋于稳定,基本接近平面地基状态。传统的平面地基附加应力计算方法不适用于斜坡地基,当临坡距在0.3 m时,地基浅层附加应力接近平面地基条件的50%,说明斜坡对地基附加应力的影响十分显著。在小临坡距条件下地基附加应力较小,但对应的地基变形却较大,也说明传统的分层总和法不适于计算斜坡地基变形,否则将影响工程安全。在地基稳定性满足要求的前提下,建议最小临坡距不小于安全距离。

关键词: 斜坡, 附加应力, 临坡距, 应力扩散, 非对称性

Abstract: Many electric transmission tower footings built on the slopes in mountainous area, it is necessary to study the additional stress distribution of slope foundation. In this paper, model tests and numerical experiments are used to research the influence on stress distribution and diffusion regularity of the additional slope foundation induced by the distance from the top of the slope. Results of the model test show that the distance from the top of the slope has a great impact on the additional stress in soil. Additional stress increases with the increase of the distance from the top of slope and has obvious asymmetry on both sides of the foundation when it is less than the safe distance. Additional stress gradually stabilized, close to the level ground state when the distance from the top of slope is more than the safe distance. When the distance from the top of slope is 0.3 m, additional stress in shallow soil is close to 50% of the plane foundation condition, the influence of additional stress in soil slope is very significant; and traditional additional stress calculation method is not applicable to slope foundation. In the small distance from the top of slope conditions, the additional stress is small; but the corresponding ground deformation is greater; it is proved that the traditional layerwise summation method is not suitable to calculate the deformation of the foundation in the slope. Otherwise, it will affect the safety of engineering. In the case of foundation stability meet the requirements, it is recommended that the minimum distance from the top of slope is not less than the safe distance.

Key words: slope, additional stress, distance from the top of slope, stress diffusion, asymmetry

中图分类号: 

  • TU 431
[1] 艾希, 冷伍明, 徐方, 张期树, 翟斌, . 新型预应力路基水平附加应力计算的图表法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 253-266.
[2] 朱雷, 黄润秋, 陈国庆, 严明, . 岩质斜坡中缓倾角破裂系统形成演化的 力学模式研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 53-62.
[3] 刘汉香, 许 强, 朱 星, 周小棚, 刘文德. 含软弱夹层斜坡地震动力响应过程 的边际谱特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1387-1396.
[4] 王启茜, 周洪福, 符文熹, 叶 飞, . 水流拖曳力对斜坡浅层土稳定性的影响分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 759-766.
[5] 卢志国, 鞠文君, 赵毅鑫, 王浩, 郑建伟, 刘爱卿, . 采动诱发应力主轴偏转对断层稳定性影响分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4459-4466.
[6] 冷伍明, 张期树, 徐方, 聂如松, 杨奇, 艾希, . 新型预应力路基坡面法向附加应力扩散规律分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3987-4000.
[7] 巨能攀, 邓天鑫, 李龙起, 蒋金阳, 张陈羊. 强震作用下陡倾顺层斜坡倾倒变形 机制离心振动台试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 99-108.
[8] 王文沛, 李 滨, 冯 振, 张博文, 高 杨, . 考虑场地效应的高陡岩质斜坡地震失稳机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 297-304.
[9] 高 樯,温 智,王大雁,牛富俊,谢艳丽,苟廷韬,. 基于冻融交界面直剪试验的冻土斜坡失稳过程研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2814-2822.
[10] 周 勇,令永强,杨校辉, . 考虑附加应力作用的桩锚支护结构稳定性与位移关系研究[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2913-2921.
[11] 赵明华,陈耀浩,杨超炜,肖 尧. 基于有限杆单元法的陡坡基桩非线性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 3020-3028.
[12] 喻豪俊,彭社琴,赵其华,. 碎石土斜坡水平受荷桩承载特性研究[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2537-2545.
[13] 张晨阳,张 明,张泰丽,孙 强,杨 龙,. 侵入岩脉风化壳对中林村残积土滑坡渗流场和稳定性的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2617-2625.
[14] 李晓明,赵庆斌,杨祈敏,赵其华,丁梓涵,. 碎石土及碎石土-基岩地基斜坡场地m值研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1327-1336.
[15] 李 伟,许 强,吴礼舟,李斯琦, . 平推式滑坡中底滑面承压水渗流形式对其稳定性的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1401-1410.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王 刚,李术才,王明斌. 渗透压力作用下加锚裂隙岩体围岩稳定性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2843 -2849 .
[2] 刘玉成,曹树刚,刘延保. 可描述地表沉陷动态过程的时间函数模型探讨[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 925 -931 .
[3] 刘恩龙. 岩土破损力学:结构块破损机制与二元介质模型[J]. , 2010, 31(S1): 13 -22 .
[4] 介玉新,杨光华. 基于广义位势理论的弹塑性模型的修正方法[J]. , 2010, 31(S2): 38 -42 .
[5] 杨建民,郑 刚. 基坑降水中渗流破坏归类及抗突涌验算公式评价[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 261 -264 .
[6] 周 华,王国进,傅少君,邹丽春,陈胜宏. 小湾拱坝坝基开挖卸荷松弛效应的有限元分析[J]. , 2009, 30(4): 1175 -1180 .
[7] 叶 飞,朱合华,何 川. 盾构隧道壁后注浆扩散模式及对管片的压力分析[J]. , 2009, 30(5): 1307 -1312 .
[8] 罗 强 ,王忠涛 ,栾茂田 ,杨蕴明 ,陈培震. 非共轴本构模型在地基承载力数值计算中若干影响因素的探讨[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 732 -0737 .
[9] 龚维明,黄 挺,戴国亮. 海上风电机高桩基础关键参数试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 115 -121 .
[10] 宋义敏 ,姜耀东 ,马少鹏 ,杨小彬 ,赵同彬 . 岩石变形破坏全过程的变形场和能量演化研究[J]. , 2012, 33(5): 1352 -1356 .