滑动测微管抗渗能力的测试装置及试验研究

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1500

岩土力学 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (7): 2504-2515.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2019.1500

• 测试技术 • 上一篇

滑动测微管抗渗能力的测试装置及试验研究

刘争宏^{1, 2, 3}，张龙^{2, 3}，郑建国^{2, 3}，张炜^{2, 3}，于永堂^{2, 3}

1. 长安大学地质工程与测绘学院，陕西西安 710054；2. 机械工业勘察设计研究院有限公司，陕西西安710043； 3. 陕西省特殊岩土与处理重点实验室，陕西西安 710043

收稿日期:2019-09-02 修回日期:2019-12-16 出版日期:2020-07-10 发布日期:2020-09-20
作者简介:刘争宏，男，1980年生，博士研究生，教授级高级工程师，主要从事特殊土相关的工程实践与研究。
基金资助:
陕西省科技统筹创新工程计划项目（No. 2016KTZDSF04-05-01）；陕西省重大科技成果转化引导专项项目（No. 2015KTCG01-08）；中国机械设备工程股份有限公司科技研发基金支持项目（No. CMEC-KJYF-2016-06）。

Testing device and experimental study on anti-seepage ability of sliding micrometer tube

LIU Zheng-hong^{1, 2, 3}, ZHANG Long^{2, 3}, ZHENG Jian-guo^{2, 3}, ZHANG Wei^{2, 3}, YU Yong-tang^{2, 3}

1. College of Geological Engineering and Geomatics, Chang’an University, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710054, China; 2. China JK Institute of Engineering Investigation and Design Co. Ltd., Xi’an, Shaanxi 710043, China; 3. Shaanxi Key Laboratory for the Property and Treatment of Special Soil and Rock, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710043, China

Received:2019-09-02 Revised:2019-12-16 Online:2020-07-10 Published:2020-09-20
Supported by:
This work was supported by the Science and Technology Overall Innovation Project of Shaanxi Province (2016KTZDSF04-05-01), the Transformation and Guidance of Major Scientific and Technological Achievements Project of Shaanxi Province (2015KTCG01-08) and the Science and Technology R & D Fund Project of China Mechanical Engineering Corporation (CMEC-KJYF-2016-06).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 使用滑动测微技术进行桩身内力测试，测管安装时的防渗处理是该技术实现高质量测试的关键，已有处理措施鲜有其防渗效果的定量研究。研发了一套滑动测微管抗渗能力测试装置，对3种常用防渗处理措施不同压差下的渗流量进行了测定，得到计算渗流量的公式，结合现场条件分析了测管安装的注意事项。结果表明，测管内压力大时的渗流量要远大于测管外压力大时的渗流量；涂胶是一种效果非常好的防渗措施，采用该措施后一般不会有超过0.005 mm粒径的颗粒进入测管；增加测管内水头有利于减少杂质进入测管，但测管内水头不能高出桩孔内液面太多；灌注混凝土后，若测管内有水溢出应封闭测管限制水的溢出，若测管内水位下降，则应开放测管允许气体进入测管。

关键词: 滑动测微计, 桩基础, 内力测试, 防渗措施

Abstract: It is a way to measure the internal force of pile foundation by sliding micrometer, and the anti-seepage measures during the installation of sliding micrometer tube are the key to achieve high quality test, while quantitative research on anti-seepage effect of measures is rare. A set of device for testing the anti-seepage ability of sliding micrometer tube was developed. The seepage flow of three common anti-seepage measures under different pressure differences was tested, and a formula for calculating the seepage flow was developed. The matters needing attention in the installation of the sliding micrometer tube were analyzed according to the site conditions. Test results show that when the internal pressure is higher than the external pressure, the seepage flow rate is much larger than that when the external pressure is larger than the internal pressure. Glue coating is a very effective anti-seepage measure, and generally no particles with a diameter over 0.005 mm will enter the sliding micrometer tube after adopting this measure. Increasing the water head in the sliding micrometer tube is beneficial to reduce impurities entering it, but the water head in the sliding micrometer tube can not be too much higher than the liquid levels in the borehole of the pile. After pouring concrete, if water overflow in the sliding micrometer tube happens, the orifice of the sliding micrometer tube should be closed to limit water overflow, and if the water level in the sliding micrometer tube falls, the orifice of the sliding micrometer tube should be opened to allow gas to enter it.

Key words: sliding micrometer, pile, stress test, anti-seepage measure

中图分类号:

TU 473.1

刘争宏, 张龙, 郑建国, 张炜, 于永堂, . 滑动测微管抗渗能力的测试装置及试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2504-2515.

LIU Zheng-hong, ZHANG Long, ZHENG Jian-guo, ZHANG Wei, YU Yong-tang, . Testing device and experimental study on anti-seepage ability of sliding micrometer tube[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2020, 41(7): 2504-2515.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	张纪蒙, 张陈蓉, 张凯, . 砂土中大直径单桩水平循环加载模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 783-789.
[2]	杨军, 孙晓立, 卞德存, 邵继喜, . 基于平行地震波法探测桩基缺陷的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(3): 874-881.
[3]	刘春林, 唐孟雄, 胡贺松, 岳云鹏, 侯振坤, 陈航, . 考虑桩底沉渣的随钻跟管桩竖向承载特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(1): 177-185.
[4]	张磊, 海维深, 甘浩, 曹卫平, 王铁行, . 水平与上拔组合荷载下柔性单桩承载特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2261-2270.
[5]	何静斌, 冯忠居, 董芸秀, 胡海波, 刘闯, 郭穗柱, 张聪, 武敏, 王振, . 强震区桩−土−断层耦合作用下桩基动力响应[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2389-2400.
[6]	蒋万里, 朱国甫, 张杰, . 单桩承载力的一种直接动测法[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(10): 3500-3508.
[7]	高广运, 谢伟, 陈娟, 赵宏, . 高铁运行引起的高架桥群桩基础地面振动衰减分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3197-3206.
[8]	吴小锋, 朱斌, 汪玉冰, . 水平环境荷载与地震动联合作用下的海上风机单桩基础动力响应模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3937-3944.
[9]	赵明华，陈耀浩，杨超炜，肖尧. 基于有限杆单元法的陡坡基桩非线性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 3020-3028.
[10]	喻豪俊，彭社琴，赵其华,. 碎石土斜坡水平受荷桩承载特性研究[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2537-2545.
[11]	刘红军，杨奇，. 局部冲刷对风机支撑系统承载性能的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 722-727.
[12]	赵明华，朱志仁，黄明华，杨超炜，徐卓君. 考虑基桩嵌岩段侧阻的岩溶区顶板安全厚度计算[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4201-4209.
[13]	叶飞，宋京，唐勇三，林剑飞，贾涛，. 软弱围岩隧道掌子面及超前核心土挤出位移特征研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 323-330.
[14]	荣雪宁，徐日庆，冯苏阳，仇涛，. 基于拉格朗日乘数法的大弯矩水平受荷桩研究[J]. , 2017, 38(9): 2605-2612.
[15]	冯君，张俊云，朱明，江南,. 软土地层高承台桥梁群桩基础横向承载特性研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 94-104.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

滑动测微管抗渗能力的测试装置及试验研究

Testing device and experimental study on anti-seepage ability of sliding micrometer tube

PDF (Chinese)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10