岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (1): 87-96.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.0770

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

激光辅助TBM盘形滚刀压头侵岩缩尺试验研究

张魁1, 2,杨长1,陈春雷1,彭赐彩1,刘杰3   

  1. 1. 湘潭大学 机械工程学院,湖南 湘潭 411105;2. 湘潭大学 复杂轨道加工技术与装备教育部工程研究中心,湖南 湘潭 411105; 3. 湖南工程学院 建筑工程学院,湖南 湘潭 411101
  • 收稿日期:2021-05-24 修回日期:2021-09-13 出版日期:2022-01-10 发布日期:2022-01-06
  • 作者简介:张魁,男,1985年生,博士,副教授,硕士生导师,主要从事大型全断面隧道掘进装备(TBM)刀盘刀具破岩机制及其设计制造理论研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 51704256,No. 51804110);湖南省自然科学基金项目(No. 2020JJ4583,No. 2017JJ3292);湖南省科技创新计划资助(No. 2021RC2094);湖南省教育厅科学研究项目一般项目(No. 19C1756)。

Scale model test on laser-assisted rock indentation by TBM disc cutter indenter

ZHANG Kui1, 2, YANG Chang1, CHEN Chun-lei1, PENG Ci-cai1, LIU Jie3   

  1. 1. School of Mechanical Engineering, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, Hunan 411105, China; 2. Engineering Research Center of Complex Tracks Processing Technology and Equipment of Ministry of Education, Xiangtan University, Xiangtan, Hunan 411105, China; 3. Architectural Engineering Institute, Hunan Institute of Engineering, Xiangtan, Hunan 411101, China
  • Received:2021-05-24 Revised:2021-09-13 Online:2022-01-10 Published:2022-01-06
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51704256, 51804110), Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (2020JJ4583, 2017JJ3292), the Science and Technology Innovation Program of Hunan Province (2021RC2094) and the General Program of Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department (19C1756).

摘要: 为了验证高能激光技术能够辅助隧道掘进机(tunnel boring machine,简称TBM)盘形滚刀(以下简称滚刀)实现高效破岩,以滚刀破岩过程中基本的运动形式——侵岩为研究对象,参照17 inch(432 mm)工程用滚刀,按1:8的比例制备了缩尺比例滚刀压头(以下引述为滚刀压头),开展了以孔孔距(2、3、4、5 mm)、刀孔距(3、4、5、6、7 mm)为变量的激光辅助滚刀压头侵岩L20(4×5)正交试验以及无激光作用的对照组试验。试验研究结果表明:随着刀孔距的增加,滚刀压头的破岩量与岩石破碎块度均增加,而垂直力和比能耗均降低,最优刀孔距为6 mm;随着孔孔距的增加,破岩量、垂直力和岩石侵入难度系数均降低,而岩石破碎块度和比能耗均增加,最优孔孔距为3 mm。与传统滚刀回转滚压破岩方式相比,在激光辅助作用下,可促进岩石张拉裂纹的产生,提高了滚刀侵岩效率。所提出的激光辅助滚刀耦合破岩模式在未来TBM极硬岩层隧道掘进中具有一定的应用前景。

关键词: 隧道掘进机(TBM), 盘形滚刀, 激光辅助, 激光钻孔, 侵岩

Abstract: To verify the efficient rock breaking ability of high-energy laser technology using for tunnel boring machines (shorted for TBM) disc cutters (hereinafter referred to as disc cutters), taking the basic movement form of the hob in the process of rock breaking-rock intrusion as the research object, a reduced scale hob indenter is prepared with a ratio of 1:8 (the following is the hob indenter) referring to the 17 inch (432 mm) engineering hob, orthogonal tests of rock invasion by hob indenter L20 (4×5) with laser assist and comparative tests without laser assist were carried out with different hole spacing (2, 3, 4, 5 mm) and cutter-hole spacing (3, 4, 5, 6, 7 mm) as variables. The experimental results show that with the increase of indenter-hole distance, both volumes of rock breakage and rock fragmentation size increase; with the increasing laser hole distance, rock breakage volume, vertical forces and the difficulty of rock breaking decrease, while rock fragmentation size and specific energy increase. The optimal indenter-hole distance and laser hole distance are 6 mm and 3 mm respectively. Compared with the traditional rock-breaking method by disc cutters, laser-assisted rock cutting would promote the generation of rock tensile cracks, and improve the rock-breaking efficiency of indentation by the cutters. The research results also show the prospects for application of the proposed laser-assisted rock cutting model to TBM tunneling under the extremely hard rock grounds in the future.

Key words: tunnel boring machine (TBM), disc cutter, laser-assisted, rock drilling, indentation

中图分类号: 

  • TU 94+1
[1] 史林肯, 周辉, 宋明, 卢景景, 张传庆, 路新景, . 深部复合地层TBM开挖扰动模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1933-1943.
[2] 吴鑫林, 张晓平, 刘泉声, 李伟伟, 黄继敏. TBM岩体可掘性预测及其分级研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1721-1729.
[3] 刘鹤, 刘泉声, 唐旭海, 罗慈友, 万文恺, 陈磊, 潘玉丛, . TBM护盾−围岩相互作用荷载识别方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4946-4954.
[4] 翟淑芳,周小平,毕 靖, . TBM滚刀破岩的广义粒子动力学数值模拟[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2699-2707.
[5] 刘泉声,赵怡凡,张晓平,孔晓璇. 灰岩隧道掘进机隧道点荷载试验评价岩石强度方法的研究与探讨[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 977-984.
[6] 陈卫忠,马池帅,田洪铭,杨建平,. TBM隧道施工期岩爆预测方法探讨[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 241-249.
[7] 马池帅,陈卫忠,田洪铭,杨建平,. 基于TBM掘进参数的岩石强度估算方法探讨[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 295-303.
[8] 黄 兴,刘泉声,彭星新,雷广峰,魏 莱,. 引大济湟工程TBM挤压大变形卡机计算分析与综合防控[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 2962-2972.
[9] 冀佩琦,张晓平,张 旗, . 延脆性变化对隧道掘进机刀具破岩过程及其破坏模式影响的颗粒元模拟分析[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 724-734.
[10] 刘泉声,潘玉丛,孔晓璇,刘建平,时 凯,崔先泽,黄诗冰,. TBM滚刀贯入过程中泥岩破坏特征试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 166-174.
[11] 谭 青 ,李建芳 ,夏毅敏 ,徐孜军 ,朱 逸 ,张 佳 . 盘形滚刀破岩过程的数值研究[J]. , 2013, 34(9): 2707-2714.
[12] 邹 飞 ,李海波 ,周青春 ,莫振泽 ,朱小明 ,牛 磊 ,杨风威 . 岩石节理倾角和间距对隧道掘进机破岩特性影响的试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(6): 1640-1646.
[13] 肖亚勋 冯夏庭 陈炳瑞 丰光亮 张照太 明华军. 深埋隧洞极强岩爆段隧道掘进机半导洞掘进岩爆风险研究[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 3111-3118.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .