岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (S2): 171-182.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1594

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

砷、镉复合污染土击实特性及微观结构试验研究

冯晨1, 2, 3,李江山1, 2,刘金都1, 2, 3,薛强1, 2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;2. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 污染泥土科学与工程湖北省重点实验室,湖北 武汉 430071;3. 中国科学院大学,北京 100049
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-18 修回日期:2022-07-15 出版日期:2022-10-10 发布日期:2022-10-03
  • 通讯作者: 李江山,男,1987年生,博士(后),研究员,博士生导师,主要从事污染土工程修复与固体废弃物资源化方面的研究。E-mail: jsli@whrsm.ac.cn E-mail:fengchen191@mails.ucas.ac.cn
  • 作者简介:冯晨,女,1997年生,博士研究生,主要从事重金属污染土环境土工特性和修复方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划(No.2019YFC1804002);国家杰出青年科学基金项目(No.51625903);国家自然科学基金面上项目(No.42177163)

Experimental study on the compaction characteristics and microstructure of arsenic and cadmium co-contaminated soil

FENG Chen1, 2, 3, LI Jiang-shan1, 2, LIU Jin-du1, 2, 3, XUE Qiang1, 2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Contaminated Sludge and Soil Science and Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 3. University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • Received:2021-09-18 Revised:2022-07-15 Online:2022-10-10 Published:2022-10-03
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program (2019YFC1804002), the National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars (51625903) and the General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (42177163).

摘要: 重金属污染土不仅破坏环境健康,同时威胁岩土工程安全。通过控制变量法对砷(As)、镉(Cd)单一污染土和复合污染土的土壤化学、土体微观结构和击实特性对比分析,研究了不同重金属污染源、不同重金属浓度对污染土的击实特性影响规律及作用机制。结果表明:单一污染土中,As使土壤扩散双电层变厚,土颗粒呈絮凝状,小孔隙增加,小颗粒含量先增后减,最优含水率升高5.90%,最大干密度降低1.02%;Cd的作用效应截然相反,Cd压缩土壤扩散双电层,土体呈堆积状,小孔隙减少,小颗粒含量减少,最优含水率降低8.03%,最大干密度增加1.00%。Cd对土体击实特性影响大于As。复合污染土中,As、Cd对土体最优含水率的影响呈协同作用,而对最大干密度无明显相互作用关系。污染土宏微观联系桥梁可以通过分形维数与最大干密度建立,二者拟合结果为二次函数关系。研究成果可为重金属污染土环境与工程灾害防控提供关键参数和理论支撑。

关键词: 镉砷复合污染土, 击实特性, 扩散双电层, 协同作用, 分形维数

Abstract: Heavy metal contaminated soils not only destroy environmental health, but also threaten the safety of geotechnical engineering. The control variable method was used to study the compaction characteristics evolution and active mechanisms of arsenic (As) and cadmium (Cd) single and composite contaminated soils with different concentrations through soil chemistry, microstructure and compaction tests. The results showed that in single contaminated soil, the As could enhance optimal moisture content by 5.90%, but decrease the maximum dry density by 1.02% through thickening diffusion double electric layer, promoting small pores and fine aggregates in flocculated structure. The effect of Cd on the soil particles is opposite. Cd compressed the diffused- double layer so that the number of small pores and fine aggregates were reduced. As a result, the optimal water content was declined by 8.03% and the maximum dry density is increased by 1.00% of Cd contaminated soil. Furthermore, the influence of Cd on the compaction characteristics of soil is greater than that of As. For the As and Cd co-contaminated soil, As and Cd had synergistic interaction on the optimal moisture content, while no interaction on maximum dry density. The correlation between macro- and micro-characteristics of contaminated soil was established by fitting the relationship between fractal dimension and the maximum dry density with a quadratic function. The results of this study can provide key parameters and theoretical support for mitigating the environmental and engineering disasters of heavy metal contaminated soils.

Key words: As and Cd co-contaminated soil, compaction characteristics, diffused double layer, synergistic interaction, fractal dimension

中图分类号: 

  • TU441
[1] 王立, 倪彬, 谢伟, 王书昭, 寇坤, 赵奎, . 不同粒径黄砂岩微观−宏观裂纹演化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 373-381.
[2] 刘金都, 冯晨, 李江山, 汪凯凯, . 砷、镉复合重金属污染土土−水特性及 微观机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(10): 2841-2851.
[3] 龚囱, 赵坤, 包涵, 赵奎, 曾鹏, 王文杰, . 红砂岩蠕变破坏声发射震源演化及其分形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(10): 2683-2695.
[4] 邹先坚, 王益腾, 王川婴. 钻孔图像中岩石结构面三维形貌特征及 优势抗滑方向研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 290-298.
[5] 孟敏强, 王磊, 蒋翔, 汪成贵, 刘汉龙, 肖杨, . 基于尺寸效应的粗粒土单颗粒破碎试验及数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 2953-2962.
[6] 吝曼卿, 张兰, 刘夕奇, 夏元友, 张电吉, 彭亚利, . 梯度应力作用下模型试件的岩爆破坏细观分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(9): 2984-2992.
[7] 杨济铭, 张小勇, 张福友, 曾超峰, 梅国雄, . 砂土中桩-土-承台协同作用下桩基 承载特性细观研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2271-2282.
[8] 杨凯旋, 侯天顺. 击实试验类型对EPS颗粒轻量土击实特性的 影响规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1971-1982.
[9] 褚福永, 朱俊高, 翁厚洋, 叶洋帆. 粗粒料级配缩尺后最大干密度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1599-1604.
[10] 刘功勋, 李威, 洪国军, 张坤勇, CHEN Xiu-han, 施绍刚, RUTTEN Tom. 大比尺切削模型试验条件下砂岩破坏特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1211-1218.
[11] 崔溦, 邹旭, 李正, 江志安, 谢武, . 分形岩石裂隙中渗流扩散运动的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(11): 3553-3562.
[12] 孙红, 宋春雨, 滕慕薇, 葛修润. 加荷条件下软黏土的孔隙演化特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 141-146.
[13] 赵国彦, 李振阳, 吴浩, 王恩杰, 刘雷磊. 含非贯通裂隙砂岩的动力破坏特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 73-81.
[14] 张小燕, 蔡燕燕, 周浩燃, 杨 洋, 李玉龙, . 珊瑚砂大剪切应变下的剪切特性和分形维数[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 610-615.
[15] 肖晓春, 樊玉峰, 吴迪, 丁鑫, 王磊, 赵宝友, . 组合煤岩破坏过程能量耗散特征及冲击危险评价[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4203-4212.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .