岩土力学 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (7): 2015-2024.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2021.1677

• 数值分析 • 上一篇    下一篇

考虑土体动力特征参数相关性的工程场地 随机地震反应分析

钟紫蓝,史跃波,李锦强,赵 密,杜修力   

  1. 北京工业大学 城市与工程安全减灾教育部重点实验室,北京 100124
  • 收稿日期:2021-10-04 修回日期:2022-03-28 出版日期:2022-07-26 发布日期:2022-08-05
  • 通讯作者: 赵密,男,1980年生,博士,教授,博士生导师,主要从事土?结构相互作用研究。E-mail: zhaomi@bjut.edu.cn E-mail: zilanzhong@bjut.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:钟紫蓝,男,1986年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事地下结构抗震研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(No. 51978020);国家自然科学基金联合基金项目(No. U1839201);广东省地震工程与应用技术重点实验室开放基金项目(No. 2017B030314068)

Stochastic seismic response analysis of engineering site considering correlations of critical soil dynamic parameters

ZHONG Zi-lan, SHI Yue-bo, LI Jin-qiang, ZHAO Mi, DU Xiu-li   

  1. Key Laboratory of Urban Security and Disaster Engineering of Ministry of Education, Beijing university of technology, Beijing 100124, China
  • Received:2021-10-04 Revised:2022-03-28 Online:2022-07-26 Published:2022-08-05
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by General Program of National Natural Science Foundation of China (51978020), the Joint Funds of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (U1839201), the Open Research Fund Program of Guangdong Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Application Technology (Guangzhou University) (2017B030314068).

摘要: 研究等效线性化方法中土体动力参数不确定性对场地地震反应的影响,提出了可考虑土体动力特征参数间相关性的土体动剪切模量和动阻尼曲线随机样本生成方法,基于Matlab开发一维等效线性化场地地震反应分析计算程序,用于开展场地地震反应随机动力分析。以Ⅱ类成层场地为例建立一维自由场分析模型,采用不同地震设防水准下露头基岩场地加速度反应谱为目标反应谱,合成人工地震记录折半后作为场地下卧基岩处的输入。计算结果表明,考虑土体动力特征参数不确定性对场地地震反应具有较大的影响,且影响程度与地震动强度、频谱成分及场地基本周期均密切相关;场地最大峰值加速度和地表加速度反应谱的波动范围随地震动强度等级的增加而变大,且最大峰值应变和最大峰值加速度的波动范围可达10%和14%;目标反应谱平台段及场地基本周期处对应的场地地表加速度反应谱的波动范围超过20%。

关键词: 场地地震反应分析, 土体动力参数, 不确定性, 相关性, 等效线性化

Abstract: This paper presents a method to generate random samples of soil dynamic shear modulus and dynamic damping curves with full consideration of the correlations of critical soil dynamic parameters to investigate the influence of their uncertainties on the engineering site seismic response in the implementation of equivalent linearization method. A one-dimensional (1D) equivalent linear site seismic response analysis program, which serves stochastic dynamic response analysis of the engineering site, has been developed in MATLAB. A 1D free field model for the typical layered engineering sites of site class II is established in this study. The target response spectra, which are defined with spectra of the outcrop corresponding to different earthquake return periods based on the acceleration response, are employed to generate artificial seismic records. These records are scaled down by ½ and referred to as input motions at the engineering bedrock for the 1D free field model. The numerical results show that the uncertainties of the critical soil dynamic parameters has significant influence on seismic response of engineering sites, which are highly related to the amplitude and the frequency aspects of the input ground motions as well as the fundamental periods of the engineering sites. The variations of the peak shear strain and the peak ground acceleration of the site, which reach 10% and 14%, respectively, increase with the amplitudes of the input ground motions. Besides, the variations of acceleration response spectra corresponding to the plateaus of the target response spectra and the fundamental periods of engineering sites exceeds 20% with the consideration of the uncertainties of soil dynamic parameters.

Key words: site seismic response analysis, soil dynamic parameters, uncertainty, correlation, equivalent linear method

中图分类号: 

  • TU 441
[1] 杨智勇, 尹城川, 聂家岩, 黎学优, 祁小辉, . 考虑场地多源勘测数据三维空间相关性的土体 参数概率密度函数估计[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(6): 1571-1584.
[2] 周永强, 盛谦, 李娜娜, 付晓东, . 非一致性地震动作用下某长大隧洞动力响应的 时空效应初步研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(8): 2287-2297.
[3] 田密, 盛小涛, . 岩土工程最小勘探数据量确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 400-408.
[4] 刘斯宏, 沈超敏, 毛航宇, 孙 屹. 堆石料状态相关弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2891-2898.
[5] 陈卓识, 袁晓铭, 孙锐, 王克. 土层剪切波速不确定性对场地刚性判断的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2748-2754.
[6] 阿比尔的,郑颖人,冯夏庭,丛 宇,. 平行黏结模型宏细观力学参数相关性研究[J]. , 2018, 39(4): 1289-1301.
[7] 李术才,贺 鹏,李利平,张乾青,石少帅,徐 飞,刘洪亮. 隧道岩质围岩亚级分级可靠度分析方法及其工程应用[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 967-376.
[8] 李瑞山,袁晓铭,李程程. 水平成层场地动剪应变与震动速度关系解析[J]. , 2018, 39(10): 3623-3630.
[9] 袁艳玲,郭琴琴,周正军,吴震宇,陈建康,姚福海,. 考虑参数相关的高心墙堆石坝材料参数反分析[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 463-470.
[10] 杨以荣,谢红强,肖明砾,刘建锋,何江达, . 卸荷条件下横观各向同性岩体扩容与能量特性分析[J]. , 2017, 38(6): 1589-1599.
[11] 祁小辉,李典庆,曹子君,唐小松, . 考虑地层变异的边坡稳定不确定性分析[J]. , 2017, 38(5): 1385-1396.
[12] 方砚兵,苏永华,肖 旺,梁 斌. 基于子区间法的隐式功能函数非概率可靠性方法研究[J]. , 2017, 38(4): 1171-1178.
[13] 杨笑梅,赖强林. 二维土层地震反应分析的时域等效线性化解法[J]. , 2017, 38(3): 847-856.
[14] 毕 骏,谌文武, . 参数m的形式和最大基质吸力点对Van Genuchten方程各参数的影响[J]. , 2017, 38(12): 3604-3612.
[15] 张 峰,周 峰,王旭东,. 成层地基中单桩竖向承载力鲁棒性设计[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3311-3318.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .