岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (9): 2509-2524.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1491

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

化学腐蚀下节理花岗岩法向刚度演变规律试验研究

刘尚,刘日成,李树忱,蔚立元,胡明慧   

  1. 中国矿业大学 深部岩土力学与地下工程国家重点实验室,江苏 徐州 221116
  • 收稿日期:2022-09-25 接受日期:2023-01-03 出版日期:2023-09-11 发布日期:2023-09-02
  • 通讯作者: 刘日成,男,1986年生,博士,研究员,主要从事复杂裂隙岩体剪切渗流方面的研究工作。E-mail: liuricheng@cumt.edu.cn E-mail:liushang@cumt.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:刘尚,男,1997年生,硕士研究生,主要从事侧限条件下节理岩体力学特性研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(No.51979272,No.52179118);江苏省自然科学基金项目(No.BK20211584);江苏省科技厅科技项目(No.BK20220025)。

Experimental study on evolution of normal stiffness of granite joints treated by chemical corrosion

LIU Shang, LIU Ri-cheng, LI Shu-chen, YU Li-yuan, HU Ming-hui   

  1. State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221116, China
  • Received:2022-09-25 Accepted:2023-01-03 Online:2023-09-11 Published:2023-09-02
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51979272, 52179118), the Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province, China (BK20211584) and the Science and Technology Projects of Jiangsu Provincial Department of Science and Technology (BK20220025).

摘要: 通过开展侧限条件下完整试样及不吻合节理试样法向荷载压缩试验,研究了节理花岗岩法向应力及法向闭合的变化特征,揭示了不同化学溶液酸碱值pH(1、3、7、12)和不同腐蚀时间t(10、30、100 d)条件下含不同初始开度b的节理试样法向刚度演变规律。试验结果表明:不吻合节理试样的应力随应变变化特征不同于完整试样及吻合节理试样,由于节理表面微凸体的崩解,在应力−应变曲线整体增长过程中产生了局部应力降现象。不吻合节理法向闭合曲线呈现非线性的特点,法向位移增加速率随法向应力先增大后减小;相同法向应力下,试样法向位移及节理闭合速率随初始开度的增大而变大。通过引入经典节理闭合模型,分析得出节理试样法向刚度同时受初始开度、pH值及腐蚀天数的影响,其中受初始开度的大小影响最为明显。当pH = 1、t = 10 d时,法向位移从1~3 mm,b = 1.65 mm的试样法向应力较b = 3.4 mm的试样提高46.26%~149.46%;节理法向应力及刚度随着酸性溶液pH值的减小而减小;随腐蚀时间增加,不同化学溶液下的部分节理法向刚度先减小后增大。

关键词: 岩石力学, 粗糙节理, 法向闭合, 化学腐蚀, 初始开度, 法向刚度

Abstract: In this study, the variation characteristics of normal stress and normal closure of granite joints were studied. The effect of chemical solution with different pH values (1, 3, 7, 12), the corrosion time t (10, 30, 100 d) and various initial openings b on the evolution of the specific normal stiffness of the specimens were revealed through normal load compression tests taking into account constraint circumferential stiffness boundary conditions. The experimental results indicate that the normal stress-normal strain curves of specimens with mismatched joints are different from the intact specimens and specimens with matched joints. Due to the crushing of the asperity on the surface of the joints, the local stress drop phenomenon occurs during the overall growth process of the stress−strain curves. The normal closing curve of mismatched joints exhibit nonlinear characteristics, in which the increasing rate of normal displacement first increases and then decreases with the increment of normal stress. Under the same normal stress, both the normal displacement and the closing rate increase with the increment of the initial opening. By introducing several classical joint closure models, it is found that the normal stress and stiffness of joints are affected by the initial opening, pH value and corrosion days, among which the initial opening is the most import. When pH = 1 and t = 10 d, with an increase of normal displacement from 1−3 mm, the normal stress of the specimens with b = 1.65 mm increase by 46.26 %−149.46 %, compared with the specimens with b = 3.4 mm. The specific normal stiffness of the mismatched joints decreases with the reduction of pH value. The normal stiffness of joints in different chemical solutions decreases first and increases then as the corrosion time increases.

Key words: rock mechanics, rough joints, normal closure, chemical corrosion, initial opening, normal stiffness

中图分类号: 

  • TU452
[1] 罗国立, 张科, 齐飞飞, 朱辉, 张凯, 刘享华, . 基于3D打印的裂隙岩体力学特性尺寸效应及各向异性初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(增刊): 107-116.
[2] 辛子朋, 柴肇云, 孙浩程, 李天宇, 刘新雨, 段碧英. 砂质泥岩峰后破裂承载特征与块体分布规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2369-2380.
[3] 骆祚森, 朱作祥, 苏卿, 李建林, 邓华锋, 杨超, . 基于平行黏结模型的水-岩作用下砂岩蠕变模拟及损伤机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2445-2457.
[4] 赵光明, 刘之喜, 孟祥瑞, 张若飞, 顾清恒, 戚敏杰, . 真三轴循环主应力作用下砂岩能量演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1875-1890.
[5] 田威, 王肖辉, 云伟, 程续. 基于不同后处理方法的砂型3D打印类岩石试样力学性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1330-1340.
[6] 王伟, 张宽, 曹亚军, 陈超, 朱其志, . 层状千枚岩各向异性力学特性与脆性评价研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 975-989.
[7] 陈曦. 基于方向性粗糙度参数的节理峰值抗剪 强度理论模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1075-1088.
[8] 田世轩, 郭保华, 孙杰豪, 程坦, . 不同边界条件下剪切速率对类岩石节理剪切力学特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 541-551.
[9] 肖维民, 林馨, 钟建敏, 李双, 朱占元, . 岩石节理微生物诱导碳酸钙沉积封堵渗流演化 规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 2798-2808.
[10] 孙杰豪, 郭保华, 田世轩, 程坦, . 峰前循环剪切作用下岩石节理剪切力学特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 52-62.
[11] 张涛, 徐卫亚, 孟庆祥, 王环玲, 闫龙, 钱坤, . 基于3D打印技术的柱状节理岩体试样 力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 245-254.
[12] 岑夺丰, 刘畅, 黄达. 灰岩层面拉剪力学特性及层面起伏效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 77-87.
[13] 刘学伟, 刘泉声, 汪志强, 刘滨, 康永水, 王传兵, . 基于格栅拱架的软岩巷道分步联合控制技术研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S1): 469-478.
[14] 王刚, 宋磊博, 刘夕奇, 包春燕, 吝曼卿, 刘广建, . 非贯通节理花岗岩剪切断裂力学特性及 声发射特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(6): 1533-1545.
[15] 王学滨, 薛承宇, 岑子豪, 陈双印, 刘桐辛, . 势接触法中法向刚度系数取值研究及岩层 运动过程模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(6): 1694-1704.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .