真三轴循环主应力作用下砂岩能量演化规律

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1757

岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (7): 1875-1890.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1757

真三轴循环主应力作用下砂岩能量演化规律

赵光明^{1, 2}，刘之喜^{1, 2}，孟祥瑞^{1, 2}，张若飞^{1, 2}，顾清恒^{1, 2}，戚敏杰^{1, 2}

1. 安徽理工大学深部煤矿采动响应与灾害防控国家重点实验室，安徽淮南 232001； 2. 安徽理工大学煤矿安全高效开采省部共建教育部重点实验室，安徽淮南 232001

收稿日期:2022-11-09 接受日期:2023-02-17 出版日期:2023-07-17 发布日期:2023-07-16
作者简介:赵光明，男，1976年生，博士，教授，博士生导师，主要从事矿山岩石力学的研究
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（No.51974009）；安徽省科技重大专项（No.202203a07020011）；安徽省“特支计划”的领军人才项目（No.T000508）；高校协同创新项目（No.GXXT-2021-075）；安徽省学术和技术带头人科研活动经费、淮北市重大科技专项（No.Z2020005）。

Energy evolution of sandstone under true triaxial cyclic principal stress

ZHAO Guang-ming^{1, 2}, LIU Zhi-xi^{1, 2}, MENG Xiang-rui^{1, 2}, ZHANG Ruo-fei^{1, 2}, GU Qing-heng^{1, 2}, QI Min-jie^{1, 2}

1. State Key Laboratory of Mining Response and Disaster Prevention and Control in Deep Coal Mines, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, Anhui 232001, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Safe and Effective Coal Mining, Ministry of Education, Anhui University of Science and Technology, Huainan, Anhui 232001, China

Received:2022-11-09 Accepted:2023-02-17 Online:2023-07-17 Published:2023-07-16
Supported by:
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51974009), Anhui Province Science and Technology Major Project (202203a07020011), Anhui Province “Special Support Plan” Leading Talents Project (T000508), the University Collaborative Innovation Project (GXXT-2021-075), Anhui Province Academic and Technology Leaders Research Activities Fund and Huaibei City Major Science and Technology Project (Z2020005).

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了探究真三轴主应力循环加卸载对砂岩能量积聚与耗散的影响，利用自主研发的真三轴扰动卸荷岩石测试系统进行了3个主应力循环加卸载试验。基于真三轴循环加卸载应力−应变演化规律与加卸载特征，划分了主应力循环加卸载试验中加载、卸载的种类；通过对三向主应力循环加卸载过后岩体表面裂纹对比分析，发现最小主应循环对岩体产生损伤最大，中间主应力次之，最大主应产生损伤最小；利用图形面积积分法与叠加法分别计算了真三轴循环加卸载的弹性能密度、耗散能密度与输入能密度，分析了三者随主应力次数增加的演化规律与加卸载过程中的能量分配；利用真三轴同时加卸载试验，验证了上述提出的能量分析方法的合理性与准确性，对其3个主应力方向卸载释放弹性能密度分析，发现循环加卸载产生的损伤对岩体储存弹性能密度影响较小。对比了3个主应力卸载对砂岩损伤与能量耗散的影响，对巷道掘进方向进行了进一步讨论。

关键词: 岩石力学, 真三轴循环加卸载, 能量积聚, 能量耗散, 加卸载分类, 能量演化

Abstract: To explore the influence of true triaxial cyclic loading and unloading in principal stress directions on sandstone energy accumulation and dissipation, three cyclic loading and unloading tests in principal stress directions were carried out by using the self-developed true triaxial disturbed unloading rock testing system. Based on the stress-strain evolution law and the loading and unloading characteristics of true triaxial cyclic loading and unloading tests, the types of loading and unloading in the cyclic loading and unloading tests are classified. Through the comparative analysis of the surface cracks of rock mass after cyclic loading and unloading in three principal stress directions, it is found that the minimum principal stress cycle causes the severest damage to rock mass, followed by the intermediate principal stress, and the maximum principal stress causes the least damage. The elastic energy density, dissipated energy density, and input energy density of true triaxial cyclic loading and unloading are calculated by using the graph area integral method and the superposition method, respectively. The evolution laws of the above three densities with the increase of the number of principal stresses and the energy distribution during loading and unloading are analyzed. The rationality and accuracy of the proposed energy analysis method are verified by the true triaxial loading and unloading test, and the elastic energy released by unloading in three principal stress directions is analyzed. The damage caused by cyclic loading and unloading has little influence on the elastic energy stored in the rock mass. The influences of unloading independently in three principal stress directions on sandstone damage and energy dissipation are compared, and the advancing direction of the roadway is further discussed.

Key words: rock mechanics, true triaxial cyclic loading and unloading, energy accumulation, energy dissipation, loading and unloading classification, energy evolution

中图分类号:

TU451

赵光明, 刘之喜, 孟祥瑞, 张若飞, 顾清恒, 戚敏杰, . 真三轴循环主应力作用下砂岩能量演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1875-1890.

ZHAO Guang-ming, LIU Zhi-xi, MENG Xiang-rui, ZHANG Ruo-fei, GU Qing-heng, QI Min-jie, . Energy evolution of sandstone under true triaxial cyclic principal stress[J]. Rock and Soil Mechanics, 2023, 44(7): 1875-1890.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	罗国立, 张科, 齐飞飞, 朱辉, 张凯, 刘享华, . 基于3D打印的裂隙岩体力学特性尺寸效应及各向异性初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(增刊): 107-116.
[2]	姜明归, 孙伟, 李金鑫, 樊锴, 刘增, . 冲击荷载下全尾砂胶结充填体断裂特性与能耗特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(增刊): 186-196.
[3]	刘尚, 刘日成, 李树忱, 蔚立元, 胡明慧. 化学腐蚀下节理花岗岩法向刚度演变规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2509-2524.
[4]	辛子朋, 柴肇云, 孙浩程, 李天宇, 刘新雨, 段碧英. 砂质泥岩峰后破裂承载特征与块体分布规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2369-2380.
[5]	骆祚森, 朱作祥, 苏卿, 李建林, 邓华锋, 杨超, . 基于平行黏结模型的水-岩作用下砂岩蠕变模拟及损伤机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2445-2457.
[6]	王磊, 张帅, 刘怀谦, 陈礼鹏, 朱传奇, 李少波, 王安铖, . 冲击荷载下含瓦斯煤能量耗散及损伤破坏规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1901-1915.
[7]	于洋, 王泽华, 唐才萱. 单轴压缩下酸腐蚀花岗岩能量演化与分形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1971-1982.
[8]	田威, 王肖辉, 云伟, 程续. 基于不同后处理方法的砂型3D打印类岩石试样力学性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1330-1340.
[9]	王伟, 张宽, 曹亚军, 陈超, 朱其志, . 层状千枚岩各向异性力学特性与脆性评价研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 975-989.
[10]	田世轩, 郭保华, 孙杰豪, 程坦, . 不同边界条件下剪切速率对类岩石节理剪切力学特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 541-551.
[11]	肖维民, 林馨, 钟建敏, 李双, 朱占元, . 岩石节理微生物诱导碳酸钙沉积封堵渗流演化规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 2798-2808.
[12]	郭佳奇, 程立攀, 朱斌忠, 田永超, 黄鑫. 持续开挖效应下结构面剪切力学性质与能量特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(1): 131-143.
[13]	孙杰豪, 郭保华, 田世轩, 程坦, . 峰前循环剪切作用下岩石节理剪切力学特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 52-62.
[14]	陈光波, 张俊文, 贺永亮, 张国华, 李谭, . 煤岩组合体峰前能量分布公式推导及试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 130-143.
[15]	张涛, 徐卫亚, 孟庆祥, 王环玲, 闫龙, 钱坤, . 基于3D打印技术的柱状节理岩体试样力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 245-254.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

真三轴循环主应力作用下砂岩能量演化规律

Energy evolution of sandstone under true triaxial cyclic principal stress

PDF (Chinese)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10