岩土力学 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (S1): 319-331.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2022.1847

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

岩石张拉裂缝与充填胶结裂隙的相互作用

尚德磊1, 2, 3,陈进帆2,褚鹏1   

  1. 1. 深圳大学 深地科学与绿色能源研究院 广东省深地科学与地热能开发利用重点实验室,广东 深圳 518060; 2. 清华大学 土木工程系,北京 100084;3. 四川大学 水力学与山区河流开发保护国家重点实验室,四川 成都 610065
  • 收稿日期:2022-11-25 接受日期:2023-04-07 出版日期:2023-11-16 发布日期:2023-11-17
  • 通讯作者: 褚鹏,男,1994年生,博士研究生,主要从事深部岩石力学方面的研究。E-mail:chupeng@cumt.edu.cn E-mail:sdl18@tsinghua.org.cn
  • 作者简介:尚德磊,男,1989年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事岩石力学与工程地质方向的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金(No. 52104096,No. 52192625);国家重点研发计划(No. 2018YFC0407005);中国博士后科学基金(No. 2018M641366);水力学与山区河流开发保护国家重点实验室(四川大学)开放基金课题(No. SKHL2216);广东省“珠江人才计划”引进创新创业团队项目(No. 2019ZT08G315)。

Interaction between tensile crack and filling cemented fissure in rock

SHANG De-lei1, 2, 3, CHEN Jin-fan2, CHU Peng1   

  1. 1. Institute of Deep Earth Sciences and Green Energy, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Deep Earth Sciences and Geothermal Energy Exploitation and Utilization, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, Guangdong 518060, China; 2. Department of Civil Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610065, China
  • Received:2022-11-25 Accepted:2023-04-07 Online:2023-11-16 Published:2023-11-17
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (52104096, 52192625), the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC0407005), the China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2018M641366), the Open Fund of State Key Laboratory of Hydraulics and Mountain River Engineering, Sichuan University (SKHL2216) and the Program for Guangdong Introducing Innovative and Enterpreneurial Teams (2019ZT08G315).

摘要: 工程开挖扰动、卸荷和水力破岩产生的工程裂缝与先存裂隙的相互作用在岩石工程中十分普遍,建立适用于工程裂缝遇先存裂隙的扩展准则是解释工程裂缝扩展机制和研究岩体弱面剪切滑移的关键。采用两种不同强度的混凝土充填材料模拟强、弱胶结的先存裂隙,在只考虑准静态张拉应力作用下,依据半圆三点弯法测定了充填胶结型岩石的Ⅰ型静态断裂韧度;通过分析工程裂缝扩展轨迹,获得了临界启裂角与应力逼近角的关系;进一步探讨了工程裂缝与先存裂隙的相互作用扩展模式与判别准则。结果表明:张拉应力作用下工程裂缝与先存裂隙的相互作用受应力逼近角、启裂逼近距离和充填物胶结强度的共同影响;充填胶结砂岩的静态断裂韧度随应力逼近角增大先增大后减小;启裂逼近距离较大时,断裂韧度随应力逼近角变化不大,而启裂逼近距离较小时,断裂韧度随应力逼近角增大呈现先增大后减小的规律;应力逼近角影响充填胶结岩石的断裂韧度,但影响程度不如启裂逼近距离和充填物胶结强度,且存在一个极限影响距离。即使在张拉应力作用下,岩石材料的裂隙前端同样存在剪切局部化,因此,工程裂缝是否穿过先存裂隙取决于应力逼近角、启裂逼近距离和充填物胶结强度共同作用下裂隙面的抗剪强度和先存裂隙面的摩擦学特性。

关键词: 半圆三点弯, 岩石断裂, 天然裂缝, 充填胶结, 断裂韧度

Abstract: The interaction of pre-existing fissures and engineering cracks caused by excavation-induced disturbance, unloading and hydraulic fracturing is very common in rock engineering. Establishing a propagation criterion suitable for engineering cracks encountering pre-existing fissures is the key to explaining the propagation mechanism of engineering cracks and investigating the weak-surface shear-slip of rock mass. The study used two concrete filling materials with different strengths to simulate the pre-existing fissures of strong and weak cementation. The mode I static fracture toughness of the filled cemented rock was determined by the semi-circular bend method under the quasi-static tensile stress. By analyzing the propagation trajectory of engineering cracks, the relationship between the critical crack initiation angle and the stress approach angle was obtained; the interaction propagation mode and initiation criteria of engineering cracks interacting with preexisting fractures were further discussed. The results show that the interaction between engineering cracks and pre-existing fissures under tensile stress is jointly affected by the stress approach angle, the crack initiation approach distance, and the cementation strength of the filling. The static fracture toughness of the filled cemented sandstone first increases and then decreases with the increase of the stress approach angle. When the crack initiation distance is large, the fracture toughness changes little with the stress approach angle; while when the crack initiation distance is short, the fracture toughness first increases and then decreases with the increase of the stress approach angle. The stress approach angle affects the fracture toughness of the cemented rock filling, but the magnitude of the influence is not as great as those of the crack initiation approach distance and the cement strength of the fillings, and there is a limited influence distance. Even if the rock material is under tensile stress, there is also shear localization at the front of the crack. Therefore, whether or not an engineered crack crosses a pre-existing fissure depends on the shear strength of the cracks and the friction properties of the pre-existing fissure under the combined effect of the stress approach angle, the crack initiation approach distance, and the cementation strength of the filling materials.

Key words: semi-circular bend, rock fracturing, natural fracture, filling cement, fracture toughness

中图分类号: 

  • TU 457
[1] 姜明归, 孙伟, 李金鑫, 樊锴, 刘增, . 冲击荷载下全尾砂胶结充填体断裂特性与能耗特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 186-196.
[2] 王雪松, 郭连军, 刘鑫, 邓丁, 张久洋, 徐振洋, . 冲击作用下花岗岩的I型裂纹形态及断面粗糙度研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1925-1936.
[3] 卢浩, 冯夏庭, 杨成祥, 张希巍, . 不同预制裂缝方法及长度对岩石三点弯曲 试验的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(4): 1115-1125.
[4] 王海军, 乐成军, 汤雷, 赵初, 李汉章, 戚海棠, . 基于3D-ILC含水平内裂纹脆性固体 三点弯断裂特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(10): 2773-2784.
[5] 吴顺川, 孙伟, 刘洋, 成子桥, 许学良, . Ⅰ型断裂韧度模拟方法及细观影响因素研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(8): 2536-2546.
[6] 张 盛, 王龙飞, 常 旭, 王东坤, 王小良, 乔 洋, . 中心直裂纹半圆盘试样的石灰岩断裂韧度 尺寸效应试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1740-1749.
[7] 赵子江,刘大安,崔振东,唐铁吾,韩伟歌,. 半圆盘三点弯曲法测定页岩断裂韧度(KIC) 的实验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 258-266.
[8] 宋义敏, 邢同振, 吕祥锋, 赵泽鑫, 邓琳琳, . 不同加载速率Ⅰ型预制裂纹花岗岩断裂特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4369-4375.
[9] 孟 涛,胡耀青,付庆楠,冯 淦,靳佩华,. 层状盐岩石膏夹层在腐蚀条件下断裂韧度试验及其弱化机制研究[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 1933-1942.
[10] 曹 富,杨丽萍,李 炼,刘恩龙,王启智, . 压缩单裂纹圆孔板(SCDC)岩石动态断裂全过程研究[J]. , 2017, 38(6): 1573-1582.
[11] 王 磊,杨春和,侯振坤,郭印同,魏元龙,蒋廷学,. 预制横缝条件下水力裂缝的起裂和扩展[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 88-94.
[12] 郭俊志,谢其泰,王建力,. 边缘裂缝圆盘砂岩试体III型断裂韧度量测之研究[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 263-266.
[13] 华 文,董世明,徐积刚. 复合型加载条件下锈岩断裂韧度试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(3): 753-758.
[14] 戴 峰,魏明东,徐奴文,许 媛,赵 涛. 岩石断裂韧度CCNSCB方法渐进破坏机制与无量纲应力强度因子宽范围标定[J]. , 2016, 37(11): 3215-3223.
[15] 仲冠宇,王瑞和,周卫东,杨焕强. 人工裂缝逼近条件下天然裂缝破坏特征分析[J]. , 2016, 37(1): 247-255.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 黄建华,宋二祥. 大型锚碇基础围护工程冻结帷幕力学性态研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3372 -3378 .
[2] 王观石,李长洪,陈保君,李世海. 应力波在非线性结构面介质中的传播规律[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3747 -3752 .
[3] 邓 琴,郭明伟,李春光,葛修润. 基于边界元法的边坡矢量和稳定分析[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1971 -1976 .
[4] 刘 嘉,王 栋. 正常固结黏土中平板锚基础的吸力和抗拉力[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 735 -740 .
[5] 赵尚毅,郑颖人,李安洪,邱文平,唐晓松,徐 俊. 多排埋入式抗滑桩在武隆县政府滑坡中的应用[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 160 -164 .
[6] 魏厚振,颜荣涛,韦昌富,吴二林,陈 盼,田慧会. 含天然气水合物沉积物相平衡问题研究综述[J]. , 2011, 32(8): 2287 -2294 .
[7] 王国粹,杨 敏. 砂土中水平受荷桩非线性分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 261 -267 .
[8] 袁敬强 ,陈卫忠 ,谭贤君 ,王 辉. 软弱地层注浆的细观力学模拟研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 653 -659 .
[9] 季毛伟 ,吴顺川 ,高永涛 ,葛林林 ,李晓静 . 双连拱隧道施工监测及数值模拟研究[J]. , 2011, 32(12): 3787 -3795 .
[10] 周家伍,刘元雪,陆 新,郑颖人. 岩土流动势的存在性及解耦性[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 375 -381 .