岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (1): 117-130.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.0107

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

巷道蝶形破坏强度准则低敏感性研究及工程应用

刘洪涛1, 2,韩子俊1, 2,刘勤裕1, 2,陈子晗1, 2,韩洲1, 2,张红凯1,杨永松1   

  1. 1.中国矿业大学(北京) 能源与矿业学院,北京 100083;2.巷道支护与灾害防治煤炭行业工程研究中心,北京 100083
  • 收稿日期:2023-02-02 接受日期:2023-06-17 出版日期:2024-01-10 发布日期:2024-01-10
  • 通讯作者: 韩子俊,男,1996年生,博士研究生,主要从事巷道围岩控制、顶板稳定性分析方面的研究。E-mail:cumtbhzj@163.com E-mail:108925@cumtb.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:刘洪涛,男,1981年生,博士,教授,主要从事矿山压力与围岩控制、矿山顶板灾害防治及预警方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目号(No.U22A20165,No.51774288,No.52004289);高校基本科研业务费资助(No.2022XJNY01)。

Low sensitivity research and engineering application of roadway butterfly failure strength criterion

LIU Hong-tao1, 2, HAN Zi-jun1, 2, LIU Qin-yu1, 2, CHEN Zi-han1, 2, HAN Zhou1, 2, ZHANG Hong-kai1, YANG Yong-song1   

  1. 1. School of Energy and Mining Engineering, China University of Mining and Technology (Beijing), Beijing 100083, China; 2. Roadway Support and Disaster Prevention Coal Industry Engineering Research Center, Beijing 100083, China
  • Received:2023-02-02 Accepted:2023-06-17 Online:2024-01-10 Published:2024-01-10
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(U22A20165,51774288,52004289)and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (2022XJNY01).

摘要: 巷道围岩的塑性区形态对巷道的破坏形式及破坏程度有重要影响。为探究三向应力场下塑性区形态演化过程,基于弹性力学推导了轴向应力表达式,并依据蝶形塑性区边界方程求解思路,确定了三维强度准则下三向塑性区近似解的求解方法。通过等球应力p、等偏应力以及不同Lode角θσ  来确定围岩应力加载方案,对不同三维强度准则下的围岩塑性区形态演化规律进行深入研究,论证了蝶形破坏的准则低敏感性。基于蝶形破坏理论对羊场湾160206回风巷道的非对称变形破坏机制及控制技术进行深入分析。研究结果表明:(1)在相同pq及不同θσ 的应力加载条件下,5种强度准则下的塑性区形态均呈现圆形、类椭圆及蝶形的演化规律,且每种强度准则在相同θσ  的情况下围岩的塑性区形态基本一致。(2)相同应力大小、不同应力方向的加载方案下,围岩的塑性区形态大不相同。圆巷围岩的塑性区形态很大程度上由水平侧压比决定,轴向侧压对围岩的塑性区尺寸影响较大,对塑性区形态影响较小。(3)羊场湾160206回风巷道在叠加采动影响下顶板呈现非对称大变形破坏,基于蝶形塑性区支护思路,应用非对称锚杆索+超前单元支架+钻孔卸压的协同支护技术,取得了良好的支护效果。

关键词: 塑性区边界, 蝶形塑性区, 强度准则, 采动影响, 巷道围岩控制

Abstract: The morphology of the plastic zone of roadway surrounding rock has an important influence on the failure mode and degree of roadway. In order to explore the evolution of plastic zone morphology under three-dimensional stress field, this paper derives the axial stress expression based on elastic mechanics, and determines the approximate solution method of 3D plastic zone under 3D strength criterion according to the idea of solving the boundary equation of butterfly plastic zone. By determining the surrounding rock stress loading scheme through equal spherical stress p and equal deviatoric stress q with different Lode angles θσ , the  morphological evolution of the plastic zone under different 3D strength criteria is studied in depth, and the low sensitivity of the criterion for butterfly failure is demonstrated. Based on the butterfly failure theory, the asymmetric deformation failure mechanism and control technology of 160206 return roadway in Yangchangwan are analyzed. The results show that: 1) Under the same p, q and different θσ   stress loading conditions, the morphology of the plastic zone under the five strength criteria shows the evolution patterns of round, oval and butterfly shapes, and the morphology of the plastic zone of surrounding rock is basically consistent for each strength criterion under the same θσ  . 2) Under the loading scheme with same stress state and different stress directions, the plastic zone morphology of surrounding rock varies greatly. The shape of the plastic zone is largely determined by the horizontal lateral pressure ratio. The axial lateral pressure has a greater influence on the size of the plastic zone, but less influence on the shape of the plastic zone. 3) Under the influence of superimposed mining, the roof of 160206 return roadway presents asymmetric large deformation and failure. Based on the support idea of butterfly plastic zone, the collaborative support technology of ' asymmetric anchor cable + advanced unit support + borehole pressure relief ' has been applied, and good supporting effect has been achieved.

Key words: plastic zone boundary, butterfly plastic zone, strength criterion, mining influence, roadway surrounding rock control

中图分类号: 

  • TU 435
[1] 高明仕, 俞鑫, 徐东, 贺永亮, 赵世帆, . 基于冲能吸能平衡效应的冲击地压巷道分级支护研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(1): 38-48.
[2] 陈曦. 基于方向性粗糙度参数的节理峰值抗剪 强度理论模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1075-1088.
[3] 郅彬, 王小婵, 刘恩龙, . 颗粒形状对粒状材料破碎演化规律及强度准则影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 649-662.
[4] 张志飞, 黄曼, 唐志成, . 估算异性岩石不连续面峰值剪切强度的经验公式[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 507-519.
[5] 姜玥, 周辉, 卢景景, 高阳, . 空心圆柱砂岩真三轴试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(4): 932-944.
[6] 王永红, 杜文, 张国辉, 宋扬, . 基于广义张−朱强度准则的深埋隧道 围岩塑性分析及应用探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(3): 819-830.
[7] 吴祥业, 王婧雅, 陈世江, 张玉江, 卜庆为, . 重复采动巷道塑性区调控原理与稳定控制[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(1): 205-217.
[8] 周超彪, 刘东, 姜清辉, . 拉剪作用下类岩石试样的力学 特性与损伤破坏机制[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(12): 3335-3344.
[9] 刘炳恒, 孔令伟, 舒荣军, 李甜果, . 湛江结构性黏土在三维应力下的 力学特性与强度准则[J]. 岩土力学, 2021, 42(11): 3090-3100.
[10] 陈昊, 胡小荣. 非饱和土三剪强度准则及验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2380-2388.
[11] 王辉, 周世琛, 周博, 薛世峰, 林英松, 吴海明, . 不同破坏准则下水合物沉积物的统计损伤模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(12): 4015-4026.
[12] 郑坤, 孟庆山, 汪稔, 余克服, . 珊瑚骨架灰岩三轴压缩声发射特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 205-213.
[13] 尹光志, 鲁俊, 张东明, 李铭辉, 邓博知, 刘 超, . 真三轴应力条件下钻孔围岩塑性区及增透半径研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 1-10.
[14] 王瑞, 闫帅, 柏建彪, 常治国, 宋远霸, . 端帮开采下煤柱破坏宽度计算及失稳机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3167-3180.
[15] 汪 杰, 宋卫东, 谭玉叶, 付建新, 曹 帅, . 水平分层胶结充填体损伤本构模型及强度准则[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1731-1739.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .