岩土力学 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (3): 647-658.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2023.1110

• 基础理论与实验研究 •    下一篇

微膨胀泥岩地基原位水分入渗响应特征试验研究

余云燕,丁小刚,马丽娜,崔文豪,杜乾中   

  1. 兰州交通大学 土木工程学院,甘肃 兰州 730070
  • 收稿日期:2023-07-26 接受日期:2023-10-06 出版日期:2024-03-11 发布日期:2024-03-20
  • 作者简介:余云燕,女,1968年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土力学、土与结构耦合动力学方面的研究。E-mail: yuyunyan@mail.lzjtu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    甘肃省教育厅产业支撑计划项目(No.2021CYZC-28);甘肃省科技计划资助(No.21YF5GA050);甘肃省自然科学基金(No.23JRRA854)。

Experimental study on in-situ water infiltration response characteristics of slightly-expansive mudstone foundation

YU Yun-yan, DING Xiao-gang, MA Li-na, CUI Wen-hao, DU Qian-zhong   

  1. College of Civil Engineering, Lanzhou Jiaotong University, Lanzhou, Gansu 730070, China
  • Received:2023-07-26 Accepted:2023-10-06 Online:2024-03-11 Published:2024-03-20
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Education Department of Gansu Province: Industrial Support Plan Project (2021CYZC-28), the Science and Technology Project of Gansu Province (21YF5GA050) and the Gansu Provincial Natural Science Foundation (23JRRA854).

摘要: 红层泥岩的膨胀性和水敏性对地区公路、高铁的建设和工后变形控制构成了长期潜在威胁。为此,依托甘肃兰州一红层泥岩路堑段,开展了微膨胀泥岩地基原位水分入渗响应特征试验,分析泥岩地基膨胀变形量、膨胀力和体积含水率时空演化规律,并讨论了室内试验和原位试验的差异性。研究结果表明:红层泥岩地基水分入渗形式包括裂隙流和孔隙流,水分场具有明显的时空分布不均匀性,岩体裂隙对渗流、膨胀具有促进作用。入渗过程中泥岩吸水膨胀具有显著的时效性,原位地基膨胀量和膨胀力均经历骤增、减速增长和缓慢增长阶段,并未能达到收敛,浸润峰后泥岩表面逐渐软化甚至泥化,会导致地基承载力下降。室内试验对原位泥岩的水分入渗响应特征反映有限。

关键词: 岩石力学, 红层泥岩, 微膨胀, 原位试验, 水分入渗

Abstract: The red bedded mudstone, known for its expansive and water-sensitive nature, poses a long-term potential threat to the construction and post-construction deformation control of regional highways and high-speed railroads. In this study, an in-situ water infiltration response characteristics test was conducted on slightly-expansive mudstone foundations using a red mudstone road cut in Lanzhou, Gansu Province. The test aimed to analyze the spatial and temporal evolution of swelling deformation volume, swelling force, and volumetric water content of the mudstone foundations, as well as to compare the differences between laboratory tests and in-situ tests. The results reveal that the water infiltration forms in the red mudstone foundation include fissure flow and pore flow. The distribution of water in the rock mass exhibits significant spatial and temporal heterogeneity, with rock mass fissures promoting seepage and expansion. During the infiltration process, the water absorption and expansion of the mudstone exhibit significant time dependence. The expansion amount and expansion force of the in-situ foundation experience stages of rapid increase, slow growth, and eventually fail to converge. After reaching the infiltration peak, the surface of the mudstone gradually softens or even turns into mud, leading to a decrease in the bearing capacity of foundation. Additionally, through the analysis of macroscopic expansion time history variation characteristics and microscopic pore structure distribution laws of indoor and in-situ mudstone, it is found that laboratory tests provide limited characterization of the water infiltration response characteristics of in-situ soil.

Key words: rock mechanics, red mudstone, slightly-expansive, in-situ test, water infiltration

中图分类号: 

  • TU451
[1] 张培森, 许大强, 颜伟, 张晓乐, 董宇航, 赵铭, . 应力-渗流耦合作用下不同卸荷路径对砂岩损伤特性及能量演化规律的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2024, 45(2): 325-339.
[2] 程树范, 曾亚武, 叶阳, 高睿, . 甘肃红层泥岩耐崩解试验与矿物夹杂效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 99-106.
[3] 罗国立, 张科, 齐飞飞, 朱辉, 张凯, 刘享华, . 基于3D打印的裂隙岩体力学特性尺寸效应及各向异性初探[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(S1): 107-116.
[4] 刘尚, 刘日成, 李树忱, 蔚立元, 胡明慧. 化学腐蚀下节理花岗岩法向刚度演变规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(9): 2509-2524.
[5] 辛子朋, 柴肇云, 孙浩程, 李天宇, 刘新雨, 段碧英. 砂质泥岩峰后破裂承载特征与块体分布规律研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2369-2380.
[6] 骆祚森, 朱作祥, 苏卿, 李建林, 邓华锋, 杨超, . 基于平行黏结模型的水-岩作用下砂岩蠕变模拟及损伤机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(8): 2445-2457.
[7] 赵光明, 刘之喜, 孟祥瑞, 张若飞, 顾清恒, 戚敏杰, . 真三轴循环主应力作用下砂岩能量演化规律[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(7): 1875-1890.
[8] 田威, 王肖辉, 云伟, 程续. 基于不同后处理方法的砂型3D打印类岩石试样力学性能研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(5): 1330-1340.
[9] 王伟, 张宽, 曹亚军, 陈超, 朱其志, . 层状千枚岩各向异性力学特性与脆性评价研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 975-989.
[10] 李波, 唐孟雄, 胡贺松, 刘春林, 凌造, 苏定立, 侯振坤. 随钻跟管桩钻孔卸荷与后注浆效应的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(4): 1044-1052.
[11] 郭景琢, 郑刚, 赵林嵩, 潘军, 张宗俊, 周强, 程雪松, . 多排孔注浆引起土体变形与孔压规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(3): 896-907.
[12] 田世轩, 郭保华, 孙杰豪, 程坦, . 不同边界条件下剪切速率对类岩石节理剪切力学特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(2): 541-551.
[13] 肖维民, 林馨, 钟建敏, 李双, 朱占元, . 岩石节理微生物诱导碳酸钙沉积封堵渗流演化 规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2023, 44(10): 2798-2808.
[14] 孙杰豪, 郭保华, 田世轩, 程坦, . 峰前循环剪切作用下岩石节理剪切力学特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 52-62.
[15] 张涛, 徐卫亚, 孟庆祥, 王环玲, 闫龙, 钱坤, . 基于3D打印技术的柱状节理岩体试样 力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2022, 43(S2): 245-254.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 姚仰平,侯 伟. 土的基本力学特性及其弹塑性描述[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2881 -2902 .
[2] 徐金明,羌培,张鹏飞. 粉质黏土图像的纹理特征分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2903 -2907 .
[3] 向天兵,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞,江 权,张传庆. 三向应力状态下单结构面岩石试样破坏机制与真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2908 -2916 .
[4] 石玉玲,门玉明,彭建兵,黄强兵,刘洪佳. 地裂缝对不同结构形式桥梁桥面的破坏试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2917 -2922 .
[5] 夏栋舟,何益斌,刘建华. 土-结构动力相互作用体系阻尼及地震反应分析[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2923 -2928 .
[6] 徐速超,冯夏庭,陈炳瑞. 矽卡岩单轴循环加卸载试验及声发射特性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2929 -2934 .
[7] 张力霆,齐清兰,魏静,霍倩,周国斌. 淤填黏土固结过程中孔隙比的变化规律[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2935 -2939 .
[8] 张其一. 复合加载模式下地基失效机制研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2940 -2944 .
[9] 易 俊,姜永东,鲜学福,罗 云,张 瑜. 声场促进煤层气渗流的应力-温度-渗流压力场的流固动态耦合模型[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2945 -2949 .
[10] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .