›› 2005, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (7): 1068-1072.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

广西红粘土和膨胀土热力学特性的比较研究

欧孝夺,吴 恒,周 东   

  1. 广西大学 土木建筑工程学院,南宁 530004
  • 收稿日期:2004-03-01 出版日期:2005-07-11 发布日期:2013-12-17
  • 作者简介:欧孝夺,男,1970年生,博士,副教授,主要从事土体结构及其工程特性的研究
  • 基金资助:

    广西科学基金资助项目(No. 桂科青0447002)

Comparative study on thermodynamics characteristics of red clay and expansive soils in Guangxi

OU Xiao-duo, WU Heng, ZHOU-Dong   

  1. College of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Guangxi University, Nanning 530004, China
  • Received:2004-03-01 Online:2005-07-11 Published:2013-12-17

摘要: 基于广西膨胀土和红粘土的成因类型、物质成分和结构特征,研究常温(-4 ℃~60 ℃)下膨胀土与红粘土的热力学特性,探讨了红粘土与膨胀土的抗剪强度指标与温度之间的相关关系。试验结果表明,两种土在10 ℃,40 ℃与室温(28 ℃)时,主应力差?1-?3峰值变化不大,而60 ℃时有明显增大;在相同条件下,红粘土的主应力差峰值变化更大;红粘土与膨胀土的抗剪强度指标(c, φ)随热状况不同而发生变化,而且红粘土的粘聚力c和膨胀土的内摩擦角φ在室温,环境有较小值。分析结果认为,两种土的热效应影响趋势相似,但红粘土的热力学特性较为敏感,这与红粘土的成因类型及胶结特征密切相关。研究结果为红粘土与膨胀土地区工程建设及减灾防灾提供参考。

关键词: 红粘土, 膨胀土, 热力学

Abstract: Based on analyzing the causes of information, material components and structural characters of the common expansive soil and the red clayed soil in Guangxi, some thermodynamics tests have been done on the red clayed soil and the expansive soil under normal temperature (-4 ℃-60 ℃) to search their thermodynamics characters and their relations between shear strength index and temperature. According to the tests,(σ1-σ3)peak value of the two kinds of soils do not change much under the indoor temperature (28 ℃) and the temperature of 10 ℃, 40 ℃ environment respectively, while under the temperature of 60 ℃ the change is obvious. Under the same conditions the main difference stress peak value of the red clayed soil has a greater change. The shear strength indices c,φ of two soils change with the hot state accordingly. Furthermore, the cohesive stress c of the red clayed soil and the friction angle φ of the common expansive soil are less relatively in the indoor temperature environment. From the tests we can conclude that the tendency of the thermodynamic influence on the red clayed soil and the expansive soil is similar, but the red clayed soil is more sensitive to the thermodynamic change. All these differences are caused by the genetic type and agglutinate character of the common clayed soil. The result of study offers reference for reducing the disasters and taking precautions against the calamities so as to help the construction on the red clayed soil and expansive soil area.

Key words: red clay, expansive soil, thermodynamics

中图分类号: 

  • TU 441
[1] 李新明, 孔令伟, 郭爱国, . 考虑卸荷速率的K0固结膨胀土应力-应变行为[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1299-1306.
[2] 郑俊杰, 吕思祺, 曹文昭, 景 丹, . 高填方膨胀土作用下刚柔复合桩基 挡墙结构数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 395-402.
[3] 庄心善, 王俊翔, 王 康, 李 凯, 胡 智. 风化砂改良膨胀土的动力特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 149-156.
[4] 李国维, 施赛杰, 侯宇宙, 吴建涛, 李 峰, 吴少甫, . 引江济淮试验工程非膨胀土开发技术实验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 302-314.
[5] 胡东旭,李 贤,周超云,薛 乐,刘洪伏,汪时机. 膨胀土干湿循环胀缩裂隙的定量分析[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 318-324.
[6] 杨和平,唐咸远,王兴正,肖 杰,倪 啸,. 有荷干湿循环条件下不同膨胀土抗剪强度基本特性[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2311-2317.
[7] 张春晓,肖宏彬,包嘉邈,尹亚虎,尹铎霖. 膨胀土应力松弛的分数阶模型[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1747-1752.
[8] 巢志明,王环玲,徐卫亚,贾朝军,赵 恺,. 一种快速制备不同含水饱和度岩石试样的方法[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1109-1114.
[9] 毛 新,汪时机, 程明书,陈正汉,王晓琪,. 膨胀土初始破损与湿干交替耦合作用下的力学行为[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 571-579.
[10] 王成龙,刘汉龙,孔纲强,吴宏伟,李建斌, . 不同刚度约束对能量桩应力和位移的影响研究[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4261-4268.
[11] 姚传芹,韦昌富,马田田,陈合龙,陈火东,. 孔隙溶液对膨胀土力学性质影响[J]. , 2017, 38(S2): 116-122.
[12] 鲜少华,许英姿,姚海林,卢 正,李志勇,董 城,. 锚固加强植被系统约束膨胀土变形模型试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 158-166.
[13] 池泽成,陈善雄,周 哲,戴张俊,宋瑞军, . 合肥重塑膨胀土三向膨胀力试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 381-386.
[14] 孔纲强,王成龙,刘汉龙,吴 迪,车 平,. 多次温度循环对能量桩桩顶位移影响分析[J]. , 2017, 38(4): 958-964.
[15] 吴珺华,杨 松,. 干湿循环下膨胀土基质吸力测定及其对抗剪强度影响试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(3): 678-684.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 丁万涛,雷胜友. 加筋膨胀土不同布筋型式三轴试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1147 -1150 .
[2] 陈 宇,张庆贺,朱继文,姚海明. 双圆盾构穿越下立交结构的流-固耦合数值模拟[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1950 -1955 .
[3] 丁文其,袁森林,高小庆,谢东武. 电力隧道超大直径顶管施工扰动特性研究[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2901 -2906 .
[4] 陈 峰,田利勇,卢伟华. 盾构隧道穿越苏州河对防汛墙的影响分析[J]. , 2010, 31(12): 3855 -3860 .
[5] 刘其鹏,武文华. 颗粒材料平均场理论的多尺度方法:理论方面[J]. , 2009, 30(4): 879 -884 .
[6] 吕玺琳,黄茂松,钱建固. 真三轴状态下砂土的强度参数[J]. , 2009, 30(4): 981 -984 .
[7] 鲁 涛,王孔伟,李建林. 库水压力作用下砂岩破坏形式的探究[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 413 -0418 .
[8] 张 磊 ,龚晓南 ,俞建霖. 考虑土体屈服的纵横荷载单桩变形内力分析[J]. , 2011, 32(8): 2441 -2445 .
[9] 魏明尧,王恩元,刘晓斐,王 超. 深部煤层卸压爆破防治冲击地压效果的数值模拟研究[J]. , 2011, 32(8): 2539 -2543 .
[10] 丁伯阳,张 勇. 杭州第四系软土动力特性试验与土结构性影响的探讨[J]. , 2012, 33(2): 336 -342 .