›› 2007, Vol. 28 ›› Issue (6): 1250-1254.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

超载预压法的卸载控制理论研究

张光永,王靖涛,卫 军,徐 辉   

  1. 华中科技大学 土木工程与力学学院, 武汉 430074
  • 收稿日期:2005-07-18 出版日期:2007-06-11 发布日期:2013-09-13
  • 作者简介:张光永,男,1966年生,博士研究生,从事岩土力学与地下工程的教学及科研工作。

Study on theory of unloading control of surcharge preloading

ZHANG Guang-yong,WANG Jing-tao,WEI Jun,XU Hui   

  1. College of Civil Eng.& Mechanics, Huazhong Univ. of Sci. and Tech., Wuhan 430074, China
  • Received:2005-07-18 Online:2007-06-11 Published:2013-09-13

摘要: 超载预压法是处理软土地基的一种有效的方法,其处理效果可以从工后沉降(后续变形)得到反映,而工后沉降与超载预压的超载比及卸载时地基达到的平均固结度有关。对于超载卸除前地基应达到的平均固结度(即卸载控制问题),目前还缺乏简单有效的计算模型。从超载预压的原理出发,基于 曲线,提出了考虑土体骨架非线性弹塑性应力-应变关系的二元件固结模型,给出了该模型的固结微分方程,并用差分法进行了求解,与传统卸载控制理论相比显示出了较理想的结果。同时,基于该模型讨论了渗透系数和土骨架的弹塑性应变的比例对卸载控制的影响。

关键词: 超载预压, 非线性弹塑性固结模型, 卸载控制

Abstract: Surcharge preloading is an effective method of foundation treatment; and its effect can be reflected from the ground settlement caused by load of building after treatment. The value of the settlement is related to surcharge ratio and consolidation degree when surcharge is unloaded. There is still lack of simple and effective computational model about average degree of consolidation which ground should achieve before surcharge is unloaded (i.e. the problem of unloading control).A two-components consolidation model, in which nonlinear elastoplastic stress-strain relation of soil skeleton is considered, is put forward based on the principle of surcharge preloading and test curve. The consolidation differential equation of the model is derived. The result of calculation based on the model is more reasonable compared with traditional theories of unloading control. And the effects of permeability coefficient and ratio between elastic and plastic strains of soil skeleton on unloading control are discussed.

Key words: surcharge precompression, nonlinear elastoplastic consolidation model, unloading control

中图分类号: 

  • TU 472.3+3
[1] 雷华阳,任 倩,卢海滨,李 宾,. 吹填场区双层软黏土地基超载比与卸载控制试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(11): 3072-3078.
[2] 张 涛 ,刘松玉 ,蔡国军 , . 太湖软土地基沉降特性分析[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 253-259.
[3] 张开鹏,熊燕文,夏元友,刘新喜. 超载预压加固软土路基效果数值分析[J]. , 2011, 32(S1): 648-0651.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 唐明明,王芝银,马兰平,曾志华,张之沛. 油气管道穿越黄土冲沟的管线设计参数研究[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1314 -1318 .
[2] 张广明,刘 合,张 劲,吴恒安,王秀喜. 储层流固耦合的数学模型和非线性有限元方程[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1657 -1662 .
[3] 梅国雄,卢廷浩,陈 浩,李 治. 考虑初始应力的坑侧土体真三轴试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2079 -2082 .
[4] 林 杭,曹 平,李江腾,江学良,何忠明. 基于Hoek-Brown准则的三维边坡变形稳定性分析[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3656 -3660 .
[5] 冉 龙,胡 琦. 粉砂地基深基坑渗透破坏研究[J]. , 2009, 30(1): 241 -245 .
[6] 钱纪芸,张 嘎,张建民. 降雨条件下土坡变形机制的离心模型试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(2): 398 -402 .
[7] 赵嘉喜,齐 辉,杨在林. 含有部分脱胶的浅埋圆夹杂对SH波的散射[J]. , 2009, 30(5): 1297 -1302 .
[8] 魏 宁,李小春,王 燕,谷志孟. 城市垃圾填埋场甲烷资源量与利用前景[J]. , 2009, 30(6): 1687 -1692 .
[9] 王可良,刘 玲,隋同波,徐运海, 胡廷正. 坝体岩基-橡胶粉改性混凝土现场抗剪(断)试验研究[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 753 -756 .
[10] 林达明,尚彦军,孙福军,孙元春,吴锋波,刘志强. 岩体强度估算方法研究及应用[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 837 -842 .