空洞上方浅基础地基破坏模式与极限承载力分析

›› 2010, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (11): 3373-3378.

空洞上方浅基础地基破坏模式与极限承载力分析

刘辉¹，杨峰²，阳军生²

1. 长沙理工大学土木与建筑学院，长沙 410076；2. 中南大学土木建筑学院，长沙 410075

收稿日期:2009-08-10 出版日期:2010-11-10 发布日期:2010-11-24
作者简介:刘辉，男，1963年生，博士，副教授，长期从事岩土工程的教学与研究工作。

Failure mechanism and ultimate bearing capacity of strip footing above void

LIU Hui¹，YANG Feng²，YANG Jun-sheng²

1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Changsha University of Science and Technology, Changsha 410076, China; 2. School of Civil and Architectural Engineering, Central South University, Changsha 410075, China

Received:2009-08-10 Online:2010-11-10 Published:2010-11-24

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

利用极限分析上限法求解地基极限承载力问题的关键在于构造合适的破坏模式。当地基下方存在空洞时，地基的破坏模式变得相当复杂。通过分析空洞存在时地基的受力特点及破坏形态，将地基破坏范围划分成为不同的刚性区和过渡区，构造了空洞上方条形基础地基的破坏模式。利用上限法，建立与破坏模式对应的速度场，推导了破坏模式不同区域内的耗散功率和外力功率，得到地基极限承载力的目标函数，并采用数学优化方法进行求解，获得了极限承载力的上限解。通过算例分析，讨论了空洞顶板厚度、空洞大小与地基极限承载力的关系，并与无空洞条件下地基极限承载力进行对比分析。结果表明，随着空洞顶板厚度增加，地基极限承载力增加，破坏模式也由地基与空洞之间扩散到地基两侧；空洞顶板厚度存在临界值，当超过此临界值时，空洞对地基极限承载力的影响可忽略。

关键词: 地基基础, 条形基础, 空洞, 极限承载力, 上限法

Abstract:

The most important step of solving ultimate bearing capacity problem by using upper bound limit analysis is to form a suitable failure mechanism. The failure mechanism becomes complex when there is a void beneath the footing. By analyzing the mechanic properties and failure shape of strip footing above void, its failure mechanism was formed and the failure range was divided by various rigid and transition area. Upon upper bound method, the velocity field corresponding to failure mechanism was built, and the energy caused by external force and energy dissipation under limit state was deduced. Thus the object function of ultimate bearing capacity can be obtained and solved by mathematic optimization. Finally, the influence factors of ultimate bearing capacity, such as void roof thickness and size, were analyzed by using calculating example. The obtained results were also compared with the case which no void contains. It shows that ultimate bearing capacity is increased with the increase of void roof thickness and the range of failure mechanism is therefore diffusing from area beneath the footing to both sides of footing. And there also exists a critical void roof thickness beyond which, the influence of void can be neglect..

Key words: foundation, strip footing, void, ultimate bearing capacity, upper bound method

中图分类号:

TU 47

刘辉，杨峰，阳军生. 空洞上方浅基础地基破坏模式与极限承载力分析[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3373-3378.

LIU Hui，YANG Feng，YANG Jun-sheng. Failure mechanism and ultimate bearing capacity of strip footing above void[J]. , 2010, 31(11): 3373-3378.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	穆锐, 浦少云, 黄质宏, 李永辉, 郑培鑫, 刘旸, 刘泽, 郑红超, . 土岩组合岩体中抗拔桩极限承载力的确定[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2825-2837.
[2]	陈峥, 何平, 颜杜民, 高红杰, 聂奥祥, . 超前支护下隧道掌子面稳定性极限上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2154-2162.
[3]	王冬勇, 陈曦, 于玉贞, 吕彦楠, . 基于二阶锥规划有限元增量加载法的条形浅基础极限承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4890-4896.
[4]	冯君, 王洋, 张俞峰, 黄林, 何长江, 吴红刚, . 玄武岩纤维与钢筋锚杆锚固性能现场对比试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4185-4193.
[5]	刘锋涛, 张绍发, 戴北冰, 张澄博, 林凯荣, . 边坡稳定分析刚体有限元上限法的锥规划模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4084-4091.
[6]	杨公标, 张成平, 闵博, 蔡义, . 浅埋含空洞地层圆形隧道开挖引起的位移复变函数弹性解[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 25-36.
[7]	宗钟凌，鲁先龙，李青松，. 静压钢管注浆微型桩抗压与抗拔对比试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 362-368.
[8]	陈福全，赖丰文，李大勇. 受空洞坍塌影响的加筋路基研究综述[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3362-3376.
[9]	尹君凡，雷勇，陈秋南，刘一新，邓加政,. 偏心荷载下溶洞顶板冲切破坏上限分析[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2837-2843.
[10]	曹文贵，谭建辉，胡卫东, . 水平加筋地基极限承载力的极限上限分析法[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 1955-1962.
[11]	张小艳，张立翔，李泽,. 基于塑性极限分析上限法理论的土质边坡可靠度分析[J]. , 2018, 39(5): 1840-1849.
[12]	李泽，刘毅，周宇，王均星,. 基于混合离散的砌石挡土墙边坡极限承载力下限分析[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1100-1108.
[13]	孔纲强，彭怀风，朱希，顾红伟，周立朵,. 水平荷载下纵截面异形桩承载特性试验[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 229-236.
[14]	江贝，李术才，王琦，王富奇，张若祥，. 基于上限法的深部大断面回采巷道顶板锚索设计方法研究[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2351-2354.
[15]	雷勇，尹君凡，陈秋南，杨威,. 基于极限分析法的溶洞顶板极限承载力研究[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 1926-1932.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed