›› 2018, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (8): 2837-2843.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2016.2876

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

偏心荷载下溶洞顶板冲切破坏上限分析

尹君凡1, 2,雷 勇1,陈秋南1,刘一新1,邓加政1   

  1. 1. 湖南科技大学 岩土工程稳定控制与健康监测湖南省重点实验室,湖南 湘潭 411201;2. 重庆市市政设计研究院,重庆 400020
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-10 出版日期:2018-08-11 发布日期:2018-09-02
  • 作者简介:尹君凡,男,1992年生,硕士,主要从事地下结构工程方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 51208195,No. 41372303);岩土工程稳定控制与健康监测湖南省重点实验室开放基金资助(No. E21618)。

Upper bound analysis of the punching shear failure of cave roof in karst area

YIN Jun-fan1, 2, LEI Yong1, CHEN Qiu-nan1, LIU Yi-xin1, DENG Jia-zheng1   

  1. 1. Hunan Provincial Key Laboratory of Geotechnical Engineering for Stability Control and Health Monitoring, Hunan University of Science and Technology, Xiangtan, Hunan 411201, China; 2. Chongqing Municipal Research Institute of Design, Chongqing 400020, China
  • Received:2016-12-10 Online:2018-08-11 Published:2018-09-02
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51208195, 41372303) and the Open Fund of Stability Control and Health Monitoring of Geotechnical Engineering of Key Laboratory of Hunan Province (E21618).

摘要: 针对冲切破坏模式下溶洞顶板极限承载力问题,进行了不同顶板厚度以及不同荷载偏心距下溶洞顶板极限承载力室内试验研究,依据试验结果将偏心荷载作用下的溶洞冲切破坏假定为轴对称问题,引入Griffith强度准则,基于极限分析上限法,提出了一种适用于轴对称和偏心荷载作用下溶洞顶底板极限承载力的计算方法,并给出了能发生冲切破坏范围的估算方法。试验结果表明:在同一偏心距下,随着顶板厚度的增加,在达到基岩极限承载力之前,顶板极限承载力呈线性增长;当顶板厚度一定时,顶板极限承载力随着偏心距的增加呈非线性增长,偏心距e在能发生冲切破坏的范围之外时趋于平缓,并逐渐达到基岩极限承载力;理论计算结果与试验结果吻合较好。

关键词: 岩溶区, 极限分析法, 极限承载力, 破坏模式, 试验研究

Abstract: Under the punching shear failure mode, the experiments were conducted on the karst cave roof to study the bearing capacity under different roof thicknesses and load eccentricities in the laboratory. The failure mode of karst cave under eccentric loading was assumed to be axisymmetric according to the experimental results. Based on the upper bound limit analysis method and Griffith strength criterion, a new method was proposed for calculating the ultimate bearing capacity of karst cave roof both under axial symmetrical and eccentric loading. Besides, a method was given for estimating the range of the punching failure area. The experimental results show that at the same eccentric distance, the ultimate bearing capacity of the roof increases linearly with the increase of the roof thickness before reaching the ultimate bearing capacity of the bedrock. When the roof thickness is constant, the ultimate bearing capacity increases nonlinearly with the increase of eccentricity. In addition, the eccentricity e tends to be gentle and reaches the ultimate bearing capacity of the bedrock at the outside the range of punching shear failure. The theoretical calculation results are in good agreement with the experimental results.

Key words: karst area, limit analysis method, ultimate bearing capacity, failure mode, experimental study

中图分类号: 

  • TU 473

[1] 周翠英, 梁彦豪, 刘春辉, 刘镇, . 天然红层风化土成膜试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 132-138.
[2] 李超, 李涛, 荆国业, 肖玉华. 竖井掘进机撑靴井壁土体极限承载力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 227-236.
[3] 褚峰, 张宏刚, 邵生俊, 邓国华. 人工合成类废布料纤维纱加筋黄土力学变形性质及抗溅蚀特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 394-403.
[4] 黄巍, 肖维民, 田梦婷, 张林浩, . 不规则柱状节理岩体力学特性模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2349-2359.
[5] 张庆艳, 陈卫忠, 袁敬强, 刘奇, 荣驰, . 断层破碎带突水突泥演化特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1911-1922.
[6] 赵明华, 彭文哲, 杨超炜, 肖尧, 刘亚楠. 斜坡地基刚性桩水平承载力上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 727-735.
[7] 孟庆彬, 钱唯, 韩立军, 蔚立元, 王丛凯, 周星, . 极弱胶结岩体再生结构的形成机制 与力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 799-812.
[8] 杨学祥, 焦园发, 杨语驿, . 充气膨胀控制锚杆的研制与试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 869-876.
[9] 江南, 黄林, 冯君, 张圣亮, 王铎, . 铁路悬索桥隧道式锚碇设计计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 999-1009.
[10] 张峰瑞, 姜谙男, 杨秀荣, 申发义. 冻融循环下花岗岩剪切蠕变试验与模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 509-519.
[11] 孙锐, 杨峰, 阳军生, 赵乙丁, 郑响凑, 罗静静, 姚捷, . 基于二阶锥规划与高阶单元的 自适应上限有限元研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 687-694.
[12] 王培涛, 黄正均, 任奋华, 章亮, 蔡美峰, . 基于3D打印的含复杂节理岩石直剪特性 及破坏机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 46-56.
[13] 赵晓彦, 万宇豪, 张肖兵. 汶马高速公路千枚岩堆积体岩块定向性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 175-184.
[14] 戴国亮, 朱文波, 郭晶, 龚维明, 赵学亮, . 软黏土中吸力式沉箱基础竖向抗拔承载 特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 119-126.
[15] 李志成, 冯先导, 沈立龙, . 沉管隧道含垄沟卵石垫层变形特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 189-194.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!