岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (S1): 189-194.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.2029

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

沉管隧道含垄沟卵石垫层变形特性试验研究

李志成1,冯先导2, 3,沈立龙2, 3   

  1. 1. 中交二航局 第五工程分公司,湖北 武汉 430040;2. 中交第二航务工程局有限公司技术中心,湖北 武汉 430040; 3. 交通基础设施智能制造技术交通运输行业研发中心,湖北 武汉 430040
  • 收稿日期:2018-11-03 出版日期:2019-08-01 发布日期:2019-08-16
  • 作者简介:李志成,男,1980年生,学士,高级工程师,主要从事桥梁与隧道工程技术研究与项目管理。

Experimental study of deformation characteristics of pebble cushion with furrow for immersed tunnel

LI Zhi-cheng1, FENG Xian-dao2, 3, SHENG Li-long2, 3   

  1. 1. The Fifth Construction Company, CCCC Second Harbor Engineering Co., Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei 430040, China; 2. CCCC Second Harbor Engineering Co., Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei 430040, China; 3. Research and Development Center of Transport Industry of Intelligent Manufacturing Technologies of Transport Infrastructure, Wuhan, Hubei 430040, China
  • Received:2018-11-03 Online:2019-08-01 Published:2019-08-16

摘要: 采用含垄沟卵石垫层作为大型沉管隧道的基础是一种创新,为研究水下该垫层在工程荷载下的变形特性,开展了7种不同工况模型静载试验,得到各工况下卵石垫层沉降量、压缩模量等参数以及荷载值与沉降量之间的关系,分析了垫层厚度、垄沟尺寸、预压荷载、级配大小等指标对卵石垫层力学特性的影响。试验结果表明,不同于碎石垫层卵石垫层承受的竖向荷载与其沉降量开始成非线性变化;随着荷载值的增加,垫层沉降速率逐渐减小,垫层被压密一定程度后荷载与沉降趋于线性关系;卵石的最大粒径越大,垫层的压缩模量越大,沉降量越小;预压导致卵石垫层再压缩时沉降明显减小,且压缩模量增大;垄沟的间距越大,卵石垫层的压缩模量越小,沉降量越大。垫层厚度越大,卵石垫层的压缩模量与沉降越大。研究成果可为沉管隧道垫层的设计提供参考。

关键词: 沉管隧道, 卵石垫层, 变形特性, 试验研究

Abstract: It is an innovation to use pebble cushion with furrow as the foundation of a large-scale immersed tunnel. In order to investigate the deformation characteristics of the pebble cushion subjected to engineering load under water, static load model tests are carried out in seven working conditions. The compression modulus of pebble cushion under various working conditions, the relationship between load and settlement are obtained. The effects of cushion thickness, ridge and furrow dimensions, preloading load and gradation on the mechanical properties of pebble cushion are analyzed. Unlike the gravel cushion, the settlement of pebble cushion initially changes nonlinearly with vertical load. With the increase of load, the settlement rate of the pebble cushion gradually decreases. The relationship between load and settlement tends to be linear after the cushion is compacted to a certain extent. The larger maximum size of the pebble results in a larger compression modulus of the cushion and a smaller settlement. The pre-compression leads to a significant reduction in the subsidence of the pebble cushion and an increase in compression modulus when compressed again. As the distance between the furrows increases and the compression modulus of pebble cushion decreases, the settlement increases. With increasing the thickness of the cushion, the settlement and compression modulus of the pebble cushion increase slightly. The research results can provide reference for the design of immersed tunnel cushion.

Key words: immersed tunnel, pebble cushion, deformation characteristics, experimental study

中图分类号: 

  • U452
[1] 周翠英, 梁彦豪, 刘春辉, 刘镇, . 天然红层风化土成膜试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 132-138.
[2] 褚峰, 张宏刚, 邵生俊, 邓国华. 人工合成类废布料纤维纱加筋黄土力学变形性质及抗溅蚀特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 394-403.
[3] 张庆艳, 陈卫忠, 袁敬强, 刘奇, 荣驰, . 断层破碎带突水突泥演化特征试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1911-1922.
[4] 张峰瑞, 姜谙男, 杨秀荣, 申发义. 冻融循环下花岗岩剪切蠕变试验与模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 509-519.
[5] 赵晓彦, 万宇豪, 张肖兵. 汶马高速公路千枚岩堆积体岩块定向性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 175-184.
[6] 周 辉, 郑 俊, 胡大伟, 张传庆, 卢景景, 高 阳, 张旺, . 碳酸性水环境下隧洞衬砌结构劣化机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2469-2477.
[7] 刘维宁, 姜博龙, 马蒙, 高健, . 周期性排桩设计频段隔振原理性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4138-4148.
[8] 王道远, 袁金秀, 朱永全, 刘佳, 王洪凡, . 硬塑-流塑浅埋黄土隧道变形特性及合理预留 变形量模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3813-3822.
[9] 张峰瑞, 姜谙男, 江宗斌, 张广涛. 化学腐蚀-冻融综合作用下岩石损伤蠕变 特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3879-3888.
[10] 刘 钟, 张楚福, 张 义, 吕美东, 许国平, 陈天雄, . 囊式扩体锚杆在宁波地区的现场试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 295-301.
[11] 刘亚平, 胥新伟, 魏红波, 宋江伟, . 港珠澳大桥深水地基载荷试验技术[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 480-485.
[12] 杨圣奇,陆家炜,田文岭,唐劲舟,. 不同节理粗糙度类岩石材料三轴压缩力学特性试验研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 21-32.
[13] 李 宣, 孙德安,张俊然,. 吸力历史对非饱和粉土动力变形特性的影响[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2829-2836.
[14] 尹君凡,雷 勇,陈秋南,刘一新,邓加政,. 偏心荷载下溶洞顶板冲切破坏上限分析[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2837-2843.
[15] 杨和平,唐咸远,王兴正,肖 杰,倪 啸,. 有荷干湿循环条件下不同膨胀土抗剪强度基本特性[J]. , 2018, 39(7): 2311-2317.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!