›› 2010, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (5): 1352-1358.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

边坡桩-土相互作用的土拱力学模型与桩间距问题

李邵军1,陈 静1,练 操2   

  1. 1.中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,武汉 430071;2.水利部长江勘测技术研究所,武汉 430010
  • 收稿日期:2009-05-11 出版日期:2010-05-10 发布日期:2010-05-24
  • 作者简介:李邵军,男,1974年生,博士,副研究员,主要从事岩土边坡安全性评估与监控方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金项目(No. 40902091);中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目(No. KJCX2–YW–L01);三峡库区三期地质灾害高切坡防护工程技术科研项目。

Mechanical model of soil arch for interaction of piles and slope and problem of pile spacing

LI Shao-jun1, CHEN Jing1, LIAN Cao2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechinical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China; 2. Changjiang Institute of Survey Planning Design and Research, Changjiang Water Resources Commission, Wuhan 430071, China
  • Received:2009-05-11 Online:2010-05-10 Published:2010-05-24

摘要:

桩-土相互作用机制是边坡抗滑桩设计需要考虑的重要因素之一。基于抗滑桩在侧向荷载作用下的受力条件,通过土力学和弹性力学的基本理论,导出了桩-土作用下桩后土体任意点的应力解析解,建立了土拱的力学模型;获得了土拱应力的等值线分布,得出了双曲拱、扩肩拱、马鞍拱和圆弧拱4种土拱形态,分析了不同桩间距、桩宽、桩后距离及土体力学特性对土拱效应的影响及其变化规律,阐明了土拱的作用机制。以拱体内土体破坏时的极限平衡状态为依据,基于Mohr-Coulomb抗剪强度理论建立了最大桩间距控制方程,并给出了具体的工程实例,对桩-土相互作用机制和抗滑桩设计理论研究具有一定的参考价值。

关键词: 边坡, 桩-土相互作用, 土拱, 力学模型, 桩间距

Abstract:

The interaction mechanism of piles and slope soil is one of the important factors for the design of anti-sliding piles. On the basis of stress condition of the passive piles subjected to lateral force, the stress expression of arbitrary point of the soil behind the piles is derived from the basic theory of soil mechanics and elastic mechanics. Accordingly, the mechanical model of soil arch is created; and distribution of soil stress isolines is given. The shape of soil arch is found to be hyperbolic, shoulder expansion arch, saddle and domal which are distributed in different zones behind the pile groups. In addition, the mechanism of arching effect is completely interpreted; the relationship between pile spacing, pile width, distance behind piles and varying effect of soil arch are discussed in detail. Moreover, some factors influencing soil arching effect, such as inner friction angle and cohesion, are discussed as well. Furthermore, with regard to the problem of maximum pile spacing, in view of the stress condition of limiting equilibrium of soil at the arching crown, the control equation of maximum pile spacing is built based on the Mohr-Coulomb theory of soil shearing strength. Finally, a practical case of slope prevention engineering is studied for the design of pile spacing. This paper will play a great role for the realization of pile-slope interaction and contribute a lot to the theory of design of anti-sliding piles in the field of slope engineering.

Key words: slope, interaction of piles and slope soil, soil arch, mechanical model, pile spacing

中图分类号: 

  • P 642.22
[1] 朱彦鹏, 陶钧, 杨校辉, 彭俊国, 吴强, . 框架预应力锚托板结构加固高填方边坡 设计与数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 612-623.
[2] 黄宇华, 徐林荣, 周俊杰, 蔡雨, . 基于改进Terzarghi方法的桩网地基桩土应力计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 667-675.
[3] 李剑, 陈善雄, 余飞, 姜领发, 戴张俊. 预应力锚索加固高陡边坡机制探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 707-713.
[4] 苏永华, 李诚诚. 强降雨下基于Green-Ampt模型的边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 389-398.
[5] 闫国强, 殷跃平, 黄波林, 张枝华, 代贞伟, . 三峡库区巫山金鸡岭滑坡成因机制与变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 329-340.
[6] 刘顺青, 黄献文, 周爱兆, 蔡国军, 姜朋明, . 基于随机块石模型的土石混合边坡稳定性 分析方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 350-358.
[7] 刘红岩. 宏细观缺陷对岩体力学特性及边坡稳定影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 431-439.
[8] 王伟, 陈国庆, 郑水全, 张广泽, 王栋, . 考虑张拉-剪切渐进破坏的边坡矢量和法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 468-476.
[9] 谢芸菲, 迟世春, 周雄雄, . 复杂环境中大规模桩筏基础的优化设计方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 486-493.
[10] 姜谙男, 张权, 吴洪涛, 段龙梅, 焦明伟, 白涛, . 基于改进局部安全度的爆破作用边坡稳定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 511-518.
[11] 吴锦亮, 何吉, . 岩质边坡动态开挖模拟的复合单元模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 535-540.
[12] 许婧璟, 唐旭海, 刘泉声, 冯禹菲. 基于能量跟踪法研究岩石破碎 对滚石运动轨迹的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 541-548.
[13] 丑亚玲, 黄守洋, 孙丽源, 王莉杰, 岳国栋, 曹伟, 盛煜, . 基于冻融作用的氯盐渍土−钢块界面力学模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 41-52.
[14] 陈宇龙, 内村太郎, . 基于弹性波波速的降雨型滑坡预警系统[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3373-3386.
[15] 聂秀鹏, 逄焕平, 孙志彬, 谢松梅, 侯超群. 三维加筋边坡地震稳定性上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3483-3492.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 王川婴,胡培良,孙卫春. 基于钻孔摄像技术的岩体完整性评价方法[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1326 -1330 .
[2] 李华明,蒋关鲁,刘先峰. CFG桩加固饱和粉土地基的动力特性试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(5): 1550 -1554 .
[3] 谈云志,孔令伟,郭爱国,万 智. 压实红黏土水分传输的毛细效应与数值模拟[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2289 -2294 .
[4] 王生新,陆勇翔,尹亚雄,郭定一. 碎石土湿陷性试验研究[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2373 -2377 .
[5] 王云岗,熊 凯,凌道盛. 基于平动加转动运动场的边坡稳定上限分析[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2619 -2624 .
[6] 龙 照,赵明华,张恩祥,刘峻龙. 锚杆临界锚固长度简化计算方法[J]. , 2010, 31(9): 2991 -2994 .
[7] 史旦达,周 健,贾敏才,杨永香. 考虑蠕变性状的港区软土地基参数反演和长期沉降预测[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 746 -750 .
[8] 邓宗伟,冷伍明,李志勇,岳志平. 喷混凝土边坡温度场与应力场耦合的有限元时效分析[J]. , 2009, 30(4): 1153 -1158 .
[9] 李 健 ,谭忠盛 ,喻 渝 ,倪鲁肃. 下穿高速公路浅埋大跨度黄土隧道施工措施研究[J]. , 2011, 32(9): 2803 -2809 .
[10] 应宏伟 ,郑贝贝 ,谢新宇. 狭窄基坑平动模式刚性挡墙被动土压力分析[J]. , 2011, 32(12): 3755 -3762 .