超大直径土压平衡盾构施工对环境影响的现场监测研究

›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (1): 235-242.

超大直径土压平衡盾构施工对环境影响的现场监测研究

侯永茂^{1, 2}，郑宜枫²，杨国祥²，葛修润¹，邱裕华²

1. 上海交通大学土木工程系，上海 200240；2. 上海隧道工程股份有限公司，上海 200082

收稿日期:2011-10-15 出版日期:2013-01-10 发布日期:2013-01-10
通讯作者: 郑宜枫，男，1967年生，博士，教授级高工，主要从事超大直径隧道方面的研究工作。E-mail: smartage@qq.com E-mail:yongmaohou@yahoo.cn
作者简介:侯永茂，男，1981年生，博士，主要从事隧道工程和基坑工程方面的研究工作
基金资助:
上海市博士后基金项目资助(No. 11r21421200)

Measurement and analysis of ground settlement due to EPB shield construction

HOU Yong-mao^{1, 2}，ZHENG Yi-feng²，YANG Guo-xiang²，GE Xiu-run¹，QIU Yu-hua²

1. Department of Civil Engineering, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai 200240, China; 2. Shanghai Tunnel Engineering Co., Ltd., Shanghai 200082, China

Received:2011-10-15 Online:2013-01-10 Published:2013-01-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 软土地层中盾构法隧道施工对周围环境影响的控制是施工中最为关心问题。依托上海迎宾三路?14.27 m土压平衡盾构隧道工程，通过在试验段布设监测断面、调整施工参数，研究超大直径土压平衡盾构施工诱发的地表沉降分布和发展规律。通过分析发现，超大直径土压平衡盾构施工中土舱压力和同步注浆参数的设定决定了地表沉降的发展规律，其中同步注浆的参数设定对于控制地表沉降起关键作用。同步注浆填充效果不佳会导致盾尾上方较大范围内地表沉降发展明显，距离盾尾越近，沉降速率越大，而填充效果较好时，地表沉降可以得到有效控制，Peck公式比较适于盾尾间隙填充效果不佳的情况。另外，监测数据揭示，盾构停推过程中超孔隙水压力逐渐消散，地表沉降持续发展，距离盾尾越近的位置地表沉降发展速率越大。

关键词: 超大直径土压平衡盾构, 地表沉降, 施工参数, 盾构停推

Abstract: Controlling the impact on the environment is the key point for the earth pressure balance (EPB) shield construction. Based on the Yingbinsanlu tunnel project constructed by the ?14.27 m earth pressure balance shield in Shanghai, field measurement is executed to study the development and distribution of the ground settlement and the relationship between the ground settlement and construction parameters. According to analyzing the measured data, it could be found that the underlying law of the ground settlement development is determined by the chamber pressure and synchronization grouting parameters. Bad filling effect of the synchronization grouting may lead to obvious development of ground surface settlement in a large region and the settlement rate of ground surface above the shield tail is maximum. Good filling effect of the synchronization grouting could effectively control the ground surface settlement. The Peck formula is suitable for the bad filling condition. In addition, measured data reveal that pore pressure would dissipate which leads to the gradually development of the ground surface settlement; and the settlement rate of ground surface above the shield tail is maximum during a long-time standstill of the EPB shield.

Key words: super-diameter EPB shield, ground settlement, construction parameters, shield standstill

中图分类号:

TU 447

侯永茂，郑宜枫，杨国祥，葛修润，邱裕华 . 超大直径土压平衡盾构施工对环境影响的现场监测研究[J]. , 2013, 34(1): 235-242.

HOU Yong-mao ，ZHENG Yi-feng ，YANG Guo-xiang ，GE Xiu-run ，QIU Yu-hua . Measurement and analysis of ground settlement due to EPB shield construction[J]. , 2013, 34(1): 235-242.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	张治国, 李胜楠, 张成平, 王志伟, . 考虑地下水位升降影响的盾构施工诱发地层变形和衬砌响应分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 281-296.
[2]	杨公标, 张成平, 闵博, 蔡义, . 浅埋含空洞地层圆形隧道开挖引起的位移复变函数弹性解[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 25-36.
[3]	胡之锋，陈健，邱岳峰，李健斌，周兴涛, . 挡墙水平变位诱发地表沉降的显式解析解[J]. , 2018, 39(11): 4165-4175.
[4]	魏纲，林雄，金睿，丁智，. 双线盾构施工时邻近地下管线安全性判别[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 181-190.
[5]	李银平，孔庆聪，施锡林，李硕，杨博进，杨春和，. 盐穴地下储库地表沉降的黏弹模型及应用[J]. , 2017, 38(7): 2049-2058.
[6]	魏纲，周杨侃. 随机介质理论预测近距离平行盾构引起的地表沉降[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 113-119.
[7]	朱才辉，李宁. 隧道施工诱发地表沉降估算方法及其规律分析[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 533-542.
[8]	沈路遥，钱建固，张戎泽,. 挡墙水平变位诱发地表沉降的简化解析解[J]. , 2016, 37(8): 2293-2298.
[9]	顾剑波，钱建固 , . 任意柔性挡墙变位诱发地表沉降的解析理论预测[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 465-470.
[10]	蔡海兵，彭立敏，郑腾龙,. 隧道水平冻结壁强制解冻期地表沉降的预测方法[J]. , 2015, 36(12): 3516-3522.
[11]	张强勇，王保群，向文,. 盐岩地下储气库风险评价层次分析模型及应用[J]. , 2014, 35(8): 2299-2306.
[12]	徐长节，成守泽，蔡袁强，罗志元,. 非对称开挖条件下基坑变形性状分析[J]. , 2014, 35(7): 1929-1934.
[13]	杨泽飞，魏纲，林磊磊，张世民. 盾构法隧道施工工后横向地表总沉降研究[J]. , 2013, 34(S2): 338-343.
[14]	王芳，贺少辉，刘军，曹瑞琅 . 盾构隧道结合洞桩法修建地铁车站地表沉降控制标准分析[J]. , 2012, 33(S2): 289-296.
[15]	滕丽，张桓. 盾构穿越砂卵石地层地表沉降特征细宏观分析[J]. , 2012, 33(4): 1141-1150.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed