深厚淤泥爆破挤淤堤坝沉降计算与分析

›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (S2): 364-369.

深厚淤泥爆破挤淤堤坝沉降计算与分析

徐学勇^{1, 2}，陈国海¹，汪稔²，狄圣杰¹，杜文博¹

1. 中国电建集团华东勘测设计研究院有限公司，杭州 310014； 2. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室，武汉 430071

收稿日期:2013-12-18 出版日期:2014-10-31 发布日期:2014-11-12
作者简介:徐学勇，男，1980年生，博士，高级工程师，从事海洋岩土工程方面的研究。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金(No. 41101519)；浙江省自然科学基金(No. LY14D020001)。

Settlement calculation and analysis of embankment with squeezing thick silt by blasting

XU Xue-yong^{1, 2}，CHEN Guo-hai¹，WANG Ren²，DI Sheng-jie¹，DU Wen-bo¹

1. PowerChina Huadong Engineering Corporation Limited, Hangzhou 310014, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China

Received:2013-12-18 Online:2014-10-31 Published:2014-11-12

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 爆破挤淤技术在海洋围垦和潮汐电站等工程堤坝建设中发挥着重要作用，随着海洋工程的不断推进，堤坝修建需要处理淤泥(软基)厚度在逐渐加深，在超过12 m的深厚淤泥中往往采用“悬浮式”堤坝结构，对该种堤坝结构开展沉降计算与分析有着重要的意义和应用价值。以惠州港兴盛油库护岸工程为工程实例，分别采用传统沉降计算方法、基于多孔介质渗透理论的考虑浮力作用沉降计算方法及数值模拟方法，对其爆破挤淤形成的“悬浮式”堤坝开展沉降计算，并与实际监测结果对比验证，分析几种沉降计算方法的适用性和合理性。研究表明，传统沉降计算方法得到的沉降值比实际监测值明显偏大，不适合于“悬浮式”堤坝沉降计算；考虑浮力作用方法和数值模拟方法的计算结果较为接近实际监测值，可用于“悬浮式”堤坝沉降计算。

关键词: 水工结构, 爆破挤淤, 悬浮式堤坝, 浮力, 沉降计算

Abstract: Blasting squeezing silt technology plays an important role in the marine reclamation and tidal power station seawall project construction. The thickness of soft clay that needs to be dealt with is gradually deepening with the continuous advance of marine engineering progressing to offshore and underwater shoals. The suspended seawall structure appears when soft clay is more than 12 m deep. Therefore, it is of great importance and of application value to carry out the settlement calculation and analysis. Taking Huizhou port depot revetment project for example, traditional settlement calculation method, the settlement calculation method considering buoyancy and numerical simulation method were applied to carry out settlement calculation; their results are compared with the actual monitoring results. Furthermore, the applicabilities and rationalities of these three methods are analyzed. It is shown that, the results of traditional settlement calculation method are significantly larger than the actual ones, it may not be suitable for suspended seawall; while the settlement calculation method considering buoyancy and numerical simulation method are suitable for suspended seawall because the calculation result are closer to the actual situation.

Key words: hydraulic structure, squeezing thick silt by blasting, suspended seawall, buoyancy, settlement calculation

中图分类号:

TV 411

徐学勇，陈国海，汪稔，狄圣杰，杜文博,. 深厚淤泥爆破挤淤堤坝沉降计算与分析[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 364-369.

XU Xue-yong ，CHEN Guo-hai ，WANG Ren ，DI Sheng-jie ，DU Wen-bo,. Settlement calculation and analysis of embankment with squeezing thick silt by blasting[J]. , 2014, 35(S2): 364-369.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	贺志军, 雷皓程, 夏张琦, 赵炼恒. 多层软土地基中单桩沉降与内力位移分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 655-666.
[2]	尹晓萌, 晏鄂川, 刘旭耀, 李兴明, . 土体稳定性计算中地下水作用力探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 156-164.
[3]	郭帅杰, 宋绪国, . 基于沉桩模拟试验的装配式地下连续墙沉桩阻力评估方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 269-274.
[4]	任连伟，周桂林，顿志林，何停印，杨权威，张敏霞，. 采空区建筑地基适宜性及沉降变形计算工程实例分析[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 2922-2932.
[5]	宋林辉，王宇豪，付磊，梅国雄,. 软黏土中地下结构浮力测试试验与分析[J]. , 2018, 39(2): 753-758.
[6]	周斌，严俊，刘斯宏，杨茂盛，. 结点虚流量法理论基础阐释及改进算法[J]. , 2018, 39(1): 349-355.
[7]	曹洪，朱东风，骆冠勇，潘泓, . 临江地下结构抗浮计算方法研究[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 2973-2979.
[8]	周佳锦，龚晓南，王奎华，张日红，王孟波，. 层状地基中静钻根植竹节桩单桩沉降计算[J]. , 2017, 38(1): 109-116.
[9]	王惠昌，王斌，蒋仁贵，王彩莲，张华,. 用桩顶垫层压缩量法计算刚性桩复合地基最大沉降量[J]. , 2016, 37(S2): 442-448.
[10]	杨光华，范泽，姜燕，张玉成 , . 刚性桩复合地基沉降计算的简化方法[J]. , 2015, 36(S1): 76-84.
[11]	齐昌广，刘干斌，陈永辉，郭卫，. 塑料套管管侧前注浆桩承载特性的现场试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(8): 2377-2385.
[12]	杨晶，白晓红，. 压实黄土非线性压缩应力-应变关系在地基沉降计算中的应用[J]. , 2015, 36(4): 1002-1008.
[13]	张敏静，罗强，詹学启，张良 . 高速铁路穿透型CFG桩复合地基沉降计算修正系数分析[J]. , 2013, 34(2): 519-525.
[14]	张社荣，王超，孙博. 重力坝层间抗滑稳定体系的动力可靠度分析方法[J]. , 2012, 33(10): 3139-3144.
[15]	金耀华钱玉林吕凡任. 基于应力路径的实用沉降计算方法[J]. , 2011, 32(10): 3071-3074.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed