岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (9): 3493-3501.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.1109

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

电渗排水固结中电极材料的对比试验

张雷1,王宁伟2,景立平3,方晨4,董瑞3   

  1. 1. 江苏科技大学 土木工程与建筑学院,江苏 镇江 212005;2. 沈阳建筑大学 土木工程学院,辽宁 沈阳 110168;3. 中国地震局工程力学研究所地震工程与工程振动重点实验室,黑龙江 哈尔滨 150080;4. 内布拉斯加大学 林肯分校 土木工程系,美国 内布拉斯加
  • 收稿日期:2018-06-24 出版日期:2019-09-10 发布日期:2019-09-05
  • 通讯作者: 景立平,男,博士,研究员,主要从事岩土地震工程方面的研究。E-mail:jlp_iem@163.com E-mail:ray_iem@163.com; lei.zhang@just.edu.cn
  • 作者简介:张雷,男,博士,讲师,主要从事软基处理、环境岩土工程方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:
    中国地震局工程力学研究所基本科研业务费专项资助项目(No.2017B10,No.2017B14);国家重点研究发展计划重点专项(No.2016YFC0800205);国家自然科学基金(No.51438004,No.51408566)

Comparative experiments of different electrode materials on electro-osmotic consolidation

ZHANG Lei1, WANG Ning-wei2, JING Li-ping3, FANG Chen4, DONG Rui3   

  1. 1. School of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Jiangsu University of Science and Technology, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu 212005, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Shenyang Jianzhu University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110168, China; 3. Key Laboratory of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin, Heilongjiang 150080, China; 4. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
  • Received:2018-06-24 Online:2019-09-10 Published:2019-09-05
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Scientific Research Fund of Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration (2017B10, 2017B14), the National Key Research and Development Program of China(2016YFC0800205) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51438004, 51408566).

摘要: 采用辽宁沿海地区淤泥质软土对铁、铜、铝和新型复合电极等不同电极材料进行室内电渗排水固结试验,从有效电势、电流、排水量与排水速率、能耗、电渗后土体含水率和承载力等对电渗效果进行分析。新型复合电极材料是由碳纤维、塑料排水板与铁片组成,其充分利用各种材料的优点,既解决了铁与碳纤维直接相连通电后易断的问题,又解决了电极腐蚀严重的问题。多组试验结果表明:新型复合电极材料的电渗排水固结使土体的加固强度提升较高,且相对均匀,加固强度达到160 kPa以上的土体面积占加固总面积的75%,说明新型复合电极材料的优越性。金属电极的腐蚀较为严重,且主要发生在阳极。根据电渗后阳极的腐蚀比,新型复合电极的腐蚀量明显低于金属电极,且新型复合电极可提高加固效果,节约电极材料成本。

关键词: 电渗排水固结, 电极材料, 新型复合电极, 排水速率, 承载力, 对比试验

Abstract: This paper conducted a series of electro-osmotic consolidation experiments on marine clayey soils collected from the coastal region in Liaoning Province. The effect of the electrode materials, such as the steel, copper, aluminum and a new composite electrode, on electro-osmotic consolidation was investigated. The consolidation efficiency was analyzed through the experimental results including the effective potential, current, dewatering amount, velocity of dewatering, energy consumption, water content and bearing capacity of the consolidated soil. The new composite electrode, which consists of the carbon fiber, plastic drainage board and steel plate, takes advantage of each material. Thus, the fracture of the steel is solved after the current flows through the steel, and the electrode erosion is reduced. The experimental results demonstrated that the strength of the consolidated soil increased significantly by using the new composite electrodes, and the soil area with the strength of larger than 160 kPa accounts for 75%. In the experiments, severe erosion of the electrode mainly occurred at the anode. According to the erosion ratio of the anode, the erosion amount of the composite electrode was less than that of the metal electrodes. The new composite electrode improved the consolidation efficiency and reduced the cost of the electrode.

Key words: electro-osmosis consolidation, electrode materials, new composite electrode, drainage speed, bearing capacity, comparative experiment

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411
[1] 李超, 李涛, 荆国业, 肖玉华. 竖井掘进机撑靴井壁土体极限承载力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 227-236.
[2] 周强, 黎康平, 段亚辉, 曹子君, 李典庆, . 基于广义可靠指标相对安全率的地基承载力 安全判据研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2052-2062.
[3] 赵明华, 彭文哲, 杨超炜, 肖尧, 刘亚楠. 斜坡地基刚性桩水平承载力上限分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 727-735.
[4] 杨学祥, 焦园发, 杨语驿, . 充气膨胀控制锚杆的研制与试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 869-876.
[5] 戴国亮, 朱文波, 郭晶, 龚维明, 赵学亮, . 软黏土中吸力式沉箱基础竖向抗拔承载 特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 119-126.
[6] 王钦科, 马建林, 陈文龙, 杨彦鑫, 胡中波, . 上覆土嵌岩扩底桩抗拔承载特性离心 模型试验及计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3405-3415.
[7] 袁维, 刘尚各, 聂庆科, 王伟, . 基于冲切破坏模式的嵌岩桩桩端溶洞顶板 临界厚度确定方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2789-2798.
[8] 穆锐, 浦少云, 黄质宏, 李永辉, 郑培鑫, 刘 旸, 刘 泽, 郑红超, . 土岩组合岩体中抗拔桩极限承载力的确定[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2825-2837.
[9] 李书兆, 王忠畅, 贾 旭, 贺林林, . 软黏土中张紧式吸力锚循环承载力简化计算方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1704-1712.
[10] 王宇飞, 刘 润. 砂土中浅埋管道在竖向−水平荷载空间的 承载力包络线研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1129-1139.
[11] 刘云, 赖 杰, 辛建平, 李秀地, 邢荣军, . 穿越断层隧道地震响应规律动力对比试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4693-4702.
[12] 王冬勇, 陈曦, 于玉贞, 吕彦楠, . 基于二阶锥规划有限元增量加载法的条形浅基础极限承载力分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4890-4896.
[13] 冯君, 王洋, 张俞峰, 黄林, 何长江, 吴红刚, . 玄武岩纤维与钢筋锚杆锚固性能现场对比试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4185-4193.
[14] 陈昌富, 邱琳淇, 毛凤山, 周志军, . 基于加权扰动共生生物搜索算法 桩网复合地基优化设计[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4477-4485.
[15] 周同和, 郜新军, 郭院成, 孙轶斌, . 下部扩大段复合桩抗拔承载力设计方法与试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3778-3782.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!