深埋圆形隧道弹塑性位移统一解及其比较分析

›› 2011, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 1315-1319.

深埋圆形隧道弹塑性位移统一解及其比较分析

曾开华1，鞠海燕1，张常光2

1.南昌工程学院土木系，南昌 330099；2.同济大学岩土及地下工程教育部重点实验室，上海 200092

收稿日期:2010-06-07 出版日期:2011-05-10 发布日期:2011-09-23
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)项目(No. 2006CB202200)。

Elastoplastic unified solution for displacements around a deep circular tunnel and its comparative analysis

ZENG Kai-hua1, JU Hai-yan1, ZHANG Chang-guang2

1. Department of Civil Engineering, Nanchang Institute of Technology, Nanchang 330099, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Geotechnical and Underground Engineering of Ministry of Education, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China

Received:2010-06-07 Online:2011-05-10 Published:2011-09-23
Supported by:
曾开华，男，1968年生，博士后，副教授，主要从事地下工程设计与施工、地基处理和边坡加固等方面的研究

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 基于统一强度理论和非关联线性流动法则，考虑塑性区的真实弹性应变，推导了深埋圆形隧道弹塑性位移统一解。位移统一解合理地考虑了中间主应力效应和围岩剪胀特性的影响，具有广泛的理论意义。经与文献简化位移解析解比较分析知，围岩塑性区的弹性应变对隧道位移影响显著，简化解析解所得结果偏小，简化解析解和文中统一解之间的差异与中间主应力效应和围岩剪胀特性密切相关；考虑中间主应力的影响，能更加充分发挥围岩的强度潜能；隧道支护设计应考虑围岩剪胀特性的重要影响

关键词: 隧道位移, 统一强度理论, 弹性应变, 中间主应力, 剪胀

Abstract: Based on the unified strength theory and a non-associated linear flow rule, an elastoplastic unified solution for displacements around a deep circular tunnel is presented, which takes the true elastic strains in the plastic zone into account. The effects of intermediate principal stress and dilatancy are considered in the unified displacement solution; so the unified solution obtained has very broadly theoretical value. Compared with the simplified analytical solutions for displacement in the literature show that the influence of the elastic strains in the plastic zone on tunnel displacements is significant. The results of the simplified analytical solutions are less than those of the unified solution. The differences between the simplified analytical solutions and the unified solution are strongly related to the effects of intermediate principal stress and dilatancy. The strength potentials of rock mass are achieved due to considering the intermediate principal stress effect. The effect of dilatancy is important for the tunnel support design.

Key words: tunnel displacement, unified strength theory, elastic strain, intermediate principal stress, dilatancy

中图分类号:

TU 452

曾开华1，鞠海燕1，张常光2. 深埋圆形隧道弹塑性位移统一解及其比较分析[J]. , 2011, 32(5): 1315-1319.

ZENG Kai-hua1, JU Hai-yan1, ZHANG Chang-guang2. Elastoplastic unified solution for displacements around a deep circular tunnel and its comparative analysis[J]. , 2011, 32(5): 1315-1319.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	梁珂, 陈国兴, 刘抗, 王彦臻, . 饱和珊瑚砂最大动剪切模量的循环加载衰退特性及预测模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 601-611.
[2]	张晨阳, 谌民, 胡明鉴, 王新志, 唐健健, . 细颗粒组分含量对钙质砂抗剪强度的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 195-202.
[3]	刘斯宏, 沈超敏, 毛航宇, 孙屹. 堆石料状态相关弹塑性本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 2891-2898.
[4]	李建朋, 高岭, 母焕胜. 高应力卸荷条件下砂岩扩容特征及其剪胀角函数[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2119-2126.
[5]	何子露, 刘威, 何思明, 闫帅星, . 饱和松散堆积体快速滑动的剪胀效应机制与过程模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2389-2396.
[6]	王凤云, 钱德玲, . 基于统一强度理论深埋圆形隧道围岩的剪胀分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1966-1976.
[7]	邵生俊, 陈菲, 邓国华, . 基于平面应变统一强度公式的结构性黄土填料挡墙地震被动土压力研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1255-1262.
[8]	周辉, 程广坦, 朱勇, 陈珺, 卢景景, 崔国建, 杨聘卿, . 大理岩规则齿形结构面剪切特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 852-860.
[9]	陆勇, 周国庆, 杨冬英, 宋家庆, . 砂土剪胀软化、剪缩硬化统一本构的显式计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 978-986.
[10]	董建勋, 刘海笑, 李洲. 适用于砂土循环加载分析的边界面塑性模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 684-692.
[11]	郭万里, 蔡正银, 武颖利, 黄英豪. 粗粒土的颗粒破碎耗能及剪胀方程研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4703-4710.
[12]	金俊超, 佘成学, 尚朋阳. 硬岩弹塑性变形破坏过程中强度参数及剪胀角演化模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4401-4411.
[13]	梅诗明, 胡小川, 苏国, 陈冠言, . 中间主应力对隧洞岩爆影响的模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3959-3968.
[14]	郭莹, 刘晓东. 成样方法对饱和粉砂不同应力路径下固结排水剪切试验结果的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3783-3788.
[15]	王军, 胡惠丽, 刘飞禹, 蔡袁强, . 粒孔比对筋土界面直剪特性的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 115-122.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed