震后沟道泥石流启动条件——松散堆积体雨中失稳的水力学机制分析

›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (10): 3043-3050.

震后沟道泥石流启动条件——松散堆积体雨中失稳的水力学机制分析

吴永^{1, 2, 3}，何思明¹，裴向军³，李新坡^{1, 3}

1. 中国科学院水利部成都山地灾害与环境研究所，成都 610041； 2. 中国矿业大学深部岩土力学与地下工程国家重点实验室，江苏徐州 221008； 3. 成都理工大学地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室，成都 610041

收稿日期:2011-05-27 出版日期:2012-10-10 发布日期:2012-10-19
作者简介:吴永，男，1981年生，博士，助理研究员，主要从事山地灾害形成机制与防治技术的研究工作
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金项目(No. 41202258，No. 41002114)；国家科技支撑项目(No. 2011BAK12B03)；西部之光项目(No. Y2R2210210)；深部岩土力学与地下工程国家重点实验室基金项目(No. SKLGDUEK1107)；地质灾害防治与地质环境保护国家重点实验室基金项目(No. SKLGP2012K023)；山地所博士基金项目(No. 110900K251)。

Analysis of condition of startup of gully debris flow after earthquake—The hydraulic mechanism of instability of loose deposits in rainfall

WU Yong^{1, 2, 3}, HE Si-ming¹, PEI Xiang-jun³, LI Xin-po^{1, 3}

1. Institute of Mountain Hazards and Environment, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610041, China; 2. State Key Laboratory for Geomechanics and Deep Underground Engineering, China University of Mining & Technology, Xuzhou, Jiangsu 221008, China; 3. State Key Laboratory of Geohazard Prevention and Geoenvironment Protention, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu 610041, China

Received:2011-05-27 Online:2012-10-10 Published:2012-10-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 5.12地震导致大规模的松散崩滑物质堆积于沟道，极大的增加了震后降雨型沟道泥石流爆发的概率。然而，灾后特殊的物源条件和成灾环境改变了传统沟道泥石流的形成机制，给震后沟道泥石流的防治工作带来了巨大的困难。为此，以水文学为基础，在构建松散堆积体潜水位变化水文学模型的前提下，借助水力学理论，分析了沟道堆积体内水力随潜水位变化的规律和特征，研究作用在单元条块堆积体上静水压力和动水压力的计算方法。在合理分段沟道松散堆积体的前提下，基于无限边坡理论完成了对各段堆积体下滑力、基底抗滑力及剩余下滑力的表达构建。结合算例解析了震后降雨条件下堆积体失稳的力学机制。分析表明，震后沟道松散堆积体失稳启动并泥石流化是流域降雨作用下堆积体内潜水位不断抬升、水力环境不断劣化的结果。流域大、沟道窄、堆积深、导水系数小、沟床缓的堆积体因较高的潜水位更易在降雨中失稳，且失稳模式因条块间剩余下滑力差异而分为整体推移启动及解体牵引启动两类。

关键词: 震后降雨, 泥石流, 松散堆积体, 沟道水文模型, 水力学机制

Abstract: Because large quantities of loose deposits were accumulated in gully after “5•12” Earthquake, the occurrence probability of gully debris flow is enhanced greatly in rainfall. However, due to the special conditions of provenance and disaster environment, the traditional theory cannot be used to expound the mechanism of gully debris flow and prevent the disaster effectively as ever after the event. Here, based on hydrology, the hydrological model of ground water table in loose deposits is established first. Then by aid of hydraulic theory, the change of hydraulic characteristics and the variation of hydraulic power with the rising of groundwater level are analyzed. Furthermore, the calculation formulas of hydrodynamic and hydrostatic pressure are also proposed. Finally, by applying infinite slope theory in calculation of sliding force, anti-sliding force and residual sliding force acting on each segment, the failure mechanism of accumulation body is illustrated clearly with an example. The result indicates the failure of loose deposits in rainfall is the result of increase of the hydraulic power with the rising of groundwater level. Those deposits which have small coefficient, gentle slope, narrow-deep gully and large basin would be easy to fail because of its high hydraulic pressure generating in rainstorm, and the failure modes can be divided into two types according to residual sliding force as pushing failure and hauling failure.

Key words: rainfall after earthquake, debris flow, loose deposits, gully hydrologic model, hydraulic mechanism

中图分类号:

U 418.5+6

吴永，何思明，裴向军，李新坡 . 震后沟道泥石流启动条件——松散堆积体雨中失稳的水力学机制分析[J]. , 2012, 33(10): 3043-3050.

WU Yong , HE Si-ming , PEI Xiang-jun , LI Xin-po . Analysis of condition of startup of gully debris flow after earthquake—The hydraulic mechanism of instability of loose deposits in rainfall[J]. , 2012, 33(10): 3043-3050.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	韩征, 粟滨, 李艳鸽, 王伟, 王卫东, 黄健陵, 陈光齐, . 基于HBP本构模型的泥石流动力过程SPH数值模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 477-485.
[2]	王东坡, 陈政, 何思明, 陈克坚, 刘发明, 李明清, . 泥石流冲击桥墩动力相互作用物理模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3363-3372.
[3]	何子露, 刘威, 何思明, 闫帅星, . 饱和松散堆积体快速滑动的剪胀效应机制与过程模拟[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2389-2396.
[4]	王友彪, 姚昌荣, 刘赛智, 李亚东, 张迅. 泥石流对桥墩冲击力的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 616-623.
[5]	谢亦朋, 杨秀竹, 阳军生, 张聪, 戴勇, 梁雄, 龚方浩, . 松散堆积体隧道围岩变形破坏细观特征研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4925-4934.
[6]	李兆华，胡杰，冯吉利，龚文俊. 基于黏弹塑性本构模型的泥石流数值模拟[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 513-520.
[7]	陈兴长，陈慧，游勇，柳金峰,. 泥石流拦砂坝底扬压力分布及影响因素试验[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3229-3236.
[8]	胡卸文，刁仁辉，梁敬轩，罗刚，魏来，. 基于CFX的江口沟泥石流危险区范围预测模拟[J]. , 2016, 37(6): 1689-1696.
[9]	杨进兵，陈兴长，汪惠，田小平，贾利蓉. 泥石流堆积物中细颗粒含量与渗透系数关系试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(11): 3184-3190.
[10]	曾超，苏志满，雷雨，余健，. 泥石流浆体与大颗粒冲击力特征的试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(7): 1923-1930.
[11]	田海，孔令伟，李波,. 降雨条件下松散堆积体边坡稳定性离心模型试验研究[J]. , 2015, 36(11): 3180-3186.
[12]	孙志亮，孔令伟，郭爱国，田海. 应力比与含水状态对松散堆积体动力参数及地表反应谱的影响[J]. , 2015, 36(10): 2765-2772.
[13]	贺拿，陈宁生，朱云华，杨建元，杨成林，. 泥石流源区砾石土分形特征及其与渗透系数关系试验研究[J]. , 2014, 35(9): 2543-2548.
[14]	徐林荣，陈舒阳，曹禄来. 泥石流危害桥隧工程易损性评价[J]. , 2014, 35(9): 2642-2650.
[15]	赵彦波，游勇，柳金峰，陈兴长,. 黏性泥石流沟床冲刷深度研究[J]. , 2014, 35(6): 1751-1755.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed