浅埋大跨小间距黄土隧道支护技术研究

›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (S2): 306-310.

浅埋大跨小间距黄土隧道支护技术研究

何历超^{1, 2}，王梦恕¹，李宇杰^{1, 3}

1. 北京交通大学隧道及地下工程教育部工程研究中心，北京 100044；2. 北京市首都公路发展集团有限公司，北京 100161； 3. 北京市地铁运营有限公司地铁运营技术研发中心，北京 100161

收稿日期:2012-11-11 出版日期:2013-11-11 发布日期:2013-11-19
作者简介:何历超，男，1982年生，博士研究生，工程师，主要从事地下工程基础理论方面研究。

Supporting technology for shallow large-span neighborhood loess tunnel

HE Li-chao^1,2，WANG Meng-shu¹，LI Yu-jie¹

1. Tunneling and Underground Engineering Research Center of Ministry of Education; Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing 100044, China; 2. Beijing Capital Highway Development Group Co., Ltd., Beijing 100161, China; 3. Beijing Mass Transit Railway Operation, Subway Operation Technology Centre, Co., Ltd., Beijing 102208, China

Received:2012-11-11 Online:2013-11-11 Published:2013-11-19

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以武-西高速公路桃花峪黄土隧道为研究对象，采用现场试验与数值模拟的方法，研究格栅和型钢支护结构对浅埋大跨小间距黄土隧道的影响规律。现场试验表明，施工引起的沉降比较均匀，格栅支护与型钢支护对控制整体沉降差别不明显。格栅钢架的受力比型钢钢架小且分布更为均匀，说明格栅钢架受力更为有利。格栅与型钢钢架受力状态相似且都合理。模拟计算表明，格栅支护与型钢支护相比，型钢支护的位移更小。较之格栅，型钢支护拱顶沉降减小16%~18%，边墙收敛减小23%，拱脚沉降减小18%。在V级黄土隧道中采用双侧壁法开挖大断面隧道，围岩将发生较大塑性变形。塑性区域发展范围较大，需及时支护，格栅支护与型钢支护对塑性发展范围基本一致。

关键词: 大断面, 黄土隧道, 格栅支护, 型钢支护

Abstract: With the Taohuayu loess tunnel of Wu-Xi expressway as the research object, it use field experiment and numerical simulation methods to research the influence laws of grating supporting and section steel supporting on shallow large-span neighborhood loess tunnel. The field experiment shows that the settlement caused by construction is uniform, and the control overall settlement ability by grating supporting and section steel supporting are similar. The stress of grating is smaller than section steel; and the stress distribution of grating is more uniform than section steel. The stress state of grating is similar to section steel; and they are reasonable. The numerical simulation shows that the displacement of section steel supporting is smaller than grating supporting. Compared with grating, the displacement on top arch of section steel supporting decreases 16%-18%, the convergence on side wall decrease 23%; the displacement on arch skew decrease 18%. Using twin-side heading method to excavate large-span tunnel in V grade loess tunnel, the surrounding rock has large plastic deformation. Plastic regional development range is very large, and it needs timely supporting. The plastic development scope by grating supporting and section steel supporting is similar.

Key words: large-span, loess tunnels, grating supporting, section steel supporting

中图分类号:

U 452

何历超，王梦恕，李宇杰 , . 浅埋大跨小间距黄土隧道支护技术研究[J]. , 2013, 34(S2): 306-310.

HE Li-chao ，WANG Meng-shu ，LI Yu-jie,. Supporting technology for shallow large-span neighborhood loess tunnel[J]. , 2013, 34(S2): 306-310.

参考文献

相关文章 15

[1]	王道远, 袁金秀, 朱永全, 刘佳, 王洪凡, . 硬塑－流塑浅埋黄土隧道变形特性及合理预留变形量模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3813-3822.
[2]	李栋, 卢义玉, 荣耀, 周东平, 郭臣业, 张尚斌, 张承客, . 基于定向水力压裂增透的大断面瓦斯隧道快速揭煤技术[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(1): 363-369.
[3]	刘聪，李术才，周宗青，李利平，王康，侯福金, 秦承帅，高成路,. 复杂地层超大断面隧道施工围岩力学特征模型试验[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3495-3504.
[4]	江贝，李术才，王琦，王富奇，张若祥，. 基于上限法的深部大断面回采巷道顶板锚索设计方法研究[J]. , 2017, 38(8): 2351-2354.
[5]	刘泉声，彭星新，雷广峰，王俊涛，张静，肖龙鸽4. 特大断面浅埋暗挖隧道十字岩柱开挖技术模型试验研究[J]. , 2017, 38(10): 2780-2788.
[6]	关振长，龚振峰，罗志彬，陈仁春，何川，. 特大断面隧道地震动力特性的振动台试验研究[J]. , 2016, 37(9): 2553-2560.
[7]	张广超，何富连. 大断面综放沿空巷道煤柱合理宽度与围岩控制[J]. , 2016, 37(6): 1721-1728.
[8]	赖金星，牛方园，樊浩博，邱军领，王开运,. 浅埋黄土隧道三层支护结构力学特性现场测试[J]. , 2015, 36(6): 1769-1775.
[9]	李雪，周顺华，宫全美，陈长江, . 大断面深埋高水压地铁盾构隧道周边土压力作用模式评价[J]. , 2015, 36(5): 1415-1420.
[10]	李嵘泰，刘弘祥，魏铭辉，黄崇仁，连祥益，沈宜庆，廖一光，. 阿里山森林铁路隧道复建工程的设计与施工探讨[J]. , 2014, 35(8): 2325-2334.
[11]	石钰锋，阳军生，邵华平，龙云，杨峰 . 超浅覆大断面暗挖隧道下穿富水河道施工风险分析及控制研究[J]. , 2012, 33(S2): 229-234.
[12]	严红，何富连，徐腾飞，蒋红军，高升. 高应力大断面煤巷锚杆索桁架系统试验研究[J]. , 2012, 33(S2): 257-262.
[13]	蒋坤，夏才初，卞跃威. 节理岩体中双向八车道小净距隧道施工方案优化分析[J]. , 2012, 33(3): 841-847.
[14]	原小帅，张庆松，李术才，李利平，刘钦. 超大断面炭质千枚岩隧道新型支护结构长期稳定性研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 556-561.
[15]	扈世民，张顶立，李鹏飞，陈峰宾，张翾. 大断面黄土隧道初期支护适应性研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 660-665.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed