›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (S2): 363-367.

• 岩土工程研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

水平土层特性变异性对传递函数影响分析初探

陈龙伟1,袁晓铭1,李雨润2   

  1. 1. 中国地震局工程力学研究所,哈尔滨 150080;2. 河北工业大学 土木工程学院,天津 300401
  • 收稿日期:2013-03-23 出版日期:2013-11-11 发布日期:2013-11-19
  • 作者简介:陈龙伟,男,1983年生,助理研究员,主要从事岩土地震工程、土动力学、工程地震方面研究
  • 基金资助:

    中国地震局工程力学研究所基本科研经费专项(No.2013B03);国家自然科学基金(No.51278472)。

Preliminary analysis of influence of site characteristics variability on site transfer function for horizontal strata

CHEN Long-wei1, YUAN Xiao-ming1, LI Yu-run2   

  1. 1. Institute of Engineering Mechanics, China Earthquake Administration, Harbin 150080, China; 2. School of Civil Engineering, Hebei University of Technology, Tianjin 300401, China
  • Received:2013-03-23 Online:2013-11-11 Published:2013-11-19

摘要: 采用Monte Carlo模拟手段,提出描述场地土层特性变异性对传递函数变异性影响的分析方法。选取日本Kik-Net强震数据库中软(FKSH14)、硬(FKSH12)两类场地,建立场地概率模型。应用Monte Carlo技术随机生成50组场地剖面,分别计算场地的传递函数STF及STF标准差,讨论场地土层厚度、剪切波速,以及二者组合情况下场地传递函数的标准差及场地特征频率的变化。结果显示:对于硬土场地而言,场地特征频率标准差相对于软土场地较大,且剪切波速变异性影响比土层厚度变异性的影响略大,而二者组合工况下最大;而软土场地,土层厚度、剪切波速变化工况下场地特征频率的标准差相当,比二者组合工况下略低;软、硬两类场地,土层厚度与剪切波速二者组合工况下STF的标准差比单一量变化情况下略大,但3种工况下场地STF标准差相差不明显;场地STF的标准差在场地自振频率附近的频率段取值较大,极值点与场地STF的极值点相对应。

关键词: 传递函数, 土层特性参数, Monte Carlo, 变异性

Abstract: Adopting Monte Carlo simulation technique, a method for describing the variability of site transfer function (STF) with respect to the variability of site characteristic parameters is proposed. Two Kik-Net seismic strong-motion stations, which were installed on hard ground (FKSH12) and soft site (FKSH14) in Japan, were selected and corresponding probability site models were established. 50 site soil profiles were randomly generated for hard ground and soft site via Monte Carlo simulation; and then the STFs were calculated as well their standard deviations, respectively. The standard deviations of STFs and the site characteristic frequencies were discussed in three cases, i.e. varying subsoil thicknesses (case I), varying subsoil shear wave velocities (case II), and varying subsoil thickness and shear wave velocities (case III). The results show that: the standard deviations of site characteristic frequencies of hard ground is overall larger than those of soft site; the standard deviation of site characteristic frequency of hard ground is the smallest in case I, followed by case II, while in case III the standard deviation of site characteristic frequency is the largest; the standard deviations of soft site characteristic frequencies in case I and case II are comparative but weakly smaller than that in case III; the standard deviations of STFs in case III for soft site and hard ground are slightly larger than those in case I and case II; but the standard deviations in the three cases are not considerably different; the standard deviations of STF are fairly large in the vicinity of site predominant frequencies with peak values corresponding to peak values of relevant mean STF.

Key words: site transfer function, site characteristic parameter, Monte Carlo, variability

中图分类号: 

  • TU 435
[1] 田密, 盛小涛, . 岩土工程最小勘探数据量确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 400-408.
[2] 于 正, 杨龙才, 张 勇, 赵 伟, . 考虑地层变异特征一致性的围岩变形不确定性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1947-1956.
[3] 黄生根, 沈佳虹, 李 萌, . 钻孔灌注桩压浆后承载性能的可靠度分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(5): 1977-1982.
[4] 费锁柱, 谭晓慧, 孙志豪, 杜林枫. 基于微结构模拟的土体自相关距离分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4751-4758.
[5] 程红战,陈 健,胡之锋,黄珏皓, . 考虑砂土抗剪强度空间变异性的盾构开挖面稳定性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(8): 3047-3054.
[6] 郭重阳,李典庆,曹子君,高国辉,唐小松. 考虑空间变异性条件下的边坡稳定可靠度高效敏感性分析[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2203-2210.
[7] 蒋水华,曾绍慧,杨建华,姚 池,黄劲松,周创兵,. 不排水抗剪强度非平稳随机场模拟及边坡可靠度分析[J]. , 2018, 39(3): 1071-1081.
[8] 田 密, 张 帆, 李丽华, . 间接测量数据条件下岩土参数空间变异性 定量分析方法对比研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(12): 4673-4680.
[9] 黄 明,张冰淇,陈福全,许德祥,. 基于扰动状态概念的桩–土相互作用的新荷载渐进性传递模型[J]. , 2017, 38(S1): 167-172.
[10] 范 刚,张建经,付 晓, . 含软弱夹层顺层岩质边坡传递函数及其应用研究[J]. , 2017, 38(4): 1052-1059.
[11] 郑 栋,李典庆,曹子君,方国光, . 土体参数空间变异性对边坡失效模式间相关性及系统可靠度的影响[J]. , 2017, 38(2): 517-524.
[12] 田 密,李典庆,曹子君,方国光,王 宇,. 基于贝叶斯理论的土性参数空间变异性量化方法[J]. , 2017, 38(11): 3355-3362.
[13] 豆红强,韩同春,龚晓南,李智宁,邱子义,. 降雨条件下考虑饱和渗透系数变异性的边坡可靠度分析[J]. , 2016, 37(4): 1144-1152.
[14] 范 刚,张建经,付 晓,汪明元,. 传递函数在场地振动台模型试验中的应用研究[J]. , 2016, 37(10): 2869-2876.
[15] 李静萍 ,程勇刚 ,李典庆 ,常晓林 , . 基于多重响应面法的空间变异土坡系统可靠度分析[J]. , 2016, 37(1): 147-155.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘小文,常立君,胡小荣. 非饱和红土基质吸力与含水率及密度关系试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3302 -3306 .
[2] 黄建华,宋二祥. 大型锚碇基础围护工程冻结帷幕力学性态研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3372 -3378 .
[3] 王观石,李长洪,陈保君,李世海. 应力波在非线性结构面介质中的传播规律[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3747 -3752 .
[4] 王朝阳,许 强,倪万魁. 原状黄土CT试验中应力-应变关系的研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 387 -391 .
[5] 邓 琴,郭明伟,李春光,葛修润. 基于边界元法的边坡矢量和稳定分析[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1971 -1976 .
[6] 万少石,年廷凯,蒋景彩,栾茂田. 边坡稳定强度折减有限元分析中的若干问题讨论[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2283 -2288 .
[7] 闫 铁,李 玮,毕雪亮. 基于分形方法的多孔介质有效应力模型研究[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2625 -2629 .
[8] 刘 嘉,王 栋. 正常固结黏土中平板锚基础的吸力和抗拉力[J]. , 2009, 30(3): 735 -740 .
[9] 徐维生,柴军瑞,陈兴周,孙旭曙. 岩体裂隙网络非线性非立方渗流研究与应用[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 53 -57 .
[10] 赵尚毅,郑颖人,李安洪,邱文平,唐晓松,徐 俊. 多排埋入式抗滑桩在武隆县政府滑坡中的应用[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 160 -164 .