›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 1495-1505.

• 测试技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

三维激光扫描技术在滑坡物理模型试验中的应用

马俊伟,唐辉明,胡新丽,雍 睿,夏 浩,宋友建   

  1. 中国地质大学 工程学院,武汉 430074
  • 收稿日期:2013-01-13 出版日期:2014-05-10 发布日期:2014-06-09
  • 通讯作者: 胡新丽,女,1968年生,博士,教授,主要从事岩土工程稳定性评价、地质灾害防治设计教学与科研工作。E-mail: huxli2000@163.com E-mail:majunweicug@gmail.com
  • 作者简介:马俊伟,男,1988年生,博士研究生,主要从事滑坡物理模型试验研究方面的工作。
  • 基金资助:

    国家重点基础研究发展计划(973)项目资助(No. 2011CB710604);国家自然科学基金重点项目(No. 41230637)。

Application of 3D laser scanning technology to landslide physical model test

MA Jun-wei, TANG Hui-ming, HU Xin-li, YONG Rui, XIA Hao, SONG You-jian   

  1. Faculty of Engineering, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China
  • Received:2013-01-13 Online:2014-05-10 Published:2014-06-09

摘要: 大型滑坡物理模型试验中常采用高精度的特征点监测,缺少整体变形资料;而三维激光扫描技术可以高精度、快速、完整地扫描实物,获得海量的点云数据,构建实物的数字化模型,从而详细描述表面细部状况。将三维激光扫描技术引入到滑坡物理模型试验坡体表面整体变形监测中,通过数字仿真试验对点云数据4种变形测量方式进行了对比和评价,推导了点云数据单个扫描点的空间位置精度的评价模型,对点云密度进行了理论分析。通过滑坡物理模型试验实例,采用点云比较、重心法、点云叠加方法测量模型的整体变形和单个监测点的位移,对滑坡不同演化阶段变形特征进行了综合分析。研究表明:空间位置精度的评价模型、点云密度模型为三维激光扫描变形监测的测量成果评定,测量方案的优化设计提供了必要的理论基础。点云叠加、点云比较为面测量,可以获得整个模型坡面的变形和位移情况,测量模型的变形趋势和变形量级,重心法、拟合法则属于点测量,可以获得单个监测点准确的位移量。基于三维激光扫描技术坡面监测是结合点测量和面测量的优势,在保证高精度特征点监测同时,获得模型坡面的整体变形和位移。

关键词: 滑坡, 模型试验, 三维激光扫描, 变形监测

Abstract: At present, the deformation analysis in the large-scale landslide physical model tests is mainly carried out with point based measurements which are generally more accurate and precise than area based techniques, especially when control targets are used. However, point based measurements provide only information of a few selected monitoring points and not on the whole surface of the model. 3D laser scanning technology captures the integrated, comprehensive, consecutive and associated panoramic coordinate data with a high degree of precision and resolution in extreme speed. It also describes factually the frame and configuration of the object. 3D laser scanning technology has been successfully applied to displacement monitoring and deformation measurement in the large-scale landslide physical model tests. In order to assess the effectiveness of the measurement methods applied to measure displacement in the laser scanning and evaluate their performances, a validation simulation experiment has been carried out. The error evaluation model of the point positional accuracy is derived. The point density in laser scanning is analyzed theoretically; and a practical test stabilized with model piles has been carried out to better understand the mechanics of such type of landslides. The displacement and deformation obtained by cloud to cloud comparison method, the barycenter method and scan data collection at two different epochs are reasoned to describe synthetically the deformation evolution process of the model here. Researches show that: the error evaluation model and point density model provide a theoretical basis for the evaluation of measurement achievement and the optimal designs for the measurement scheme. The cloud to cloud comparison method and scanning data collection techniques are area based measurements, while barycenter method and the benchmark method are point based. With point based measurement small deformations can be detected in only a few selected positions due to the largely manual measurement process. The area based methods give a good approximation of the displacement amplitudes and provide the whole deformation of the slope surface. The application of the 3D laser scanning technology to the landslide model test has the advantage of combining both the point based and area based methods. It provides the whole deformation while maintaining the high precision for the selected positions.

Key words: landslide, physical model test, 3D laser scanning technology, deformation monitoring

中图分类号: 

  • TU 458+.4
[1] 王国辉, 陈文化, 聂庆科, 陈军红, 范晖红, 张川, . 深厚淤泥质土中基坑开挖对基桩 影响的离心模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 399-407.
[2] 陈贺, 张玉芳, 张新民, 魏少伟, . 高压注浆钢花管微型桩抗滑特性 足尺模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 428-436.
[3] 雷华阳, 胡垚, 雷尚华, 祁子洋, 许英刚, . 增压式真空预压加固吹填超软土微观结构特征分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 32-40.
[4] 于一帆, 王平, 王会娟, 许书雅, 郭海涛, . 堆积层滑坡地震动力响应的物理模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 172-180.
[5] 闫国强, 殷跃平, 黄波林, 张枝华, 代贞伟, . 三峡库区巫山金鸡岭滑坡成因机制与变形特征[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 329-340.
[6] 王东坡, 陈政, 何思明, 陈克坚, 刘发明, 李明清, . 泥石流冲击桥墩动力相互作用物理模型试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3363-3372.
[7] 陈宇龙, 内村太郎, . 基于弹性波波速的降雨型滑坡预警系统[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3373-3386.
[8] 王钦科, 马建林, 陈文龙, 杨彦鑫, 胡中波, . 上覆土嵌岩扩底桩抗拔承载特性离心 模型试验及计算方法研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3405-3415.
[9] 卢谅, 石通辉, 杨东, . 置换减载与加筋复合处理方法对路基不 均匀沉降控制效果研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3474-3482.
[10] 黄晓虎, 雷德鑫, 夏俊宝, 易武, 张鹏, . 降雨诱发滑坡阶跃型变形的预测分析及应用[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3585-3592.
[11] 杨文波, 邹涛, 涂玖林, 谷笑旭, 刘雨辰, 晏启祥, 何川. 高速列车振动荷载作用下马蹄形断面隧 道动力响应特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3635-3644.
[12] 邓茂林, 易庆林, 韩蓓, 周剑, 李卓骏, 张富灵, . 长江三峡库区木鱼包滑坡地表变形规律分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3145-3152.
[13] 蔡雨, 徐林荣, 周德泉, 邓超, 冯晨曦, . 自平衡与传统静载试桩法模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3011-3018.
[14] 孙飞, 张志强, 易志伟. 正断层黏滑错动对地铁隧道结构影响 的模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(8): 3037-3044.
[15] 詹良通, 胡英涛, 刘小川, 陈捷, 王瀚霖, 朱斌, 陈云敏. 非饱和黄土地基降雨入渗离心模型试验 及多物理量联合监测[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2478-2486.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 陶干强,杨仕教,任凤玉. 崩落矿岩散粒体流动性能试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 2950 -2954 .
[2] 张文杰,陈云敏. 垃圾填埋场抽水试验及降水方案设计[J]. , 2010, 31(1): 211 -215 .
[3] 宫伟力,安里千,赵海燕,毛灵涛. 基于图像描述的煤岩裂隙CT图像多尺度特征[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 371 -376 .
[4] 万 智,董 辉,刘宝琛. 基于正交设计下SVM滑坡变形时序回归预测的超参数选择[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 503 -508 .
[5] 孙曦源,栾茂田,唐小微. 饱和软黏土地基中桶形基础水平承载力研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 667 -672 .
[6] 王明年,郭 军,罗禄森,喻 渝,杨建民,谭忠盛. 高速铁路大断面黄土隧道深浅埋分界深度研究[J]. , 2010, 31(4): 1157 -1162 .
[7] 胡勇刚,罗 强,张 良,黄 晶,陈亚美. 基于离心模型试验的水泥土搅拌法加固斜坡软弱土地基变形特性分析[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2207 -2213 .
[8] 谭峰屹,姜志全,李仲秋,颜惠和. 附加质量法在昆明新机场填料压实密度检测中的应用研究[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2214 -2218 .
[9] 柴 波,殷坤龙,肖拥军. 巴东新城区库岸斜坡软弱带特征[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2501 -2506 .
[10] 王光进,杨春和,张 超,马洪岭,孔祥云,侯克鹏. 超高排土场的粒径分级及其边坡稳定性分析研究[J]. , 2011, 32(3): 905 -913 .