›› 2014, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (8): 2231-2240.

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于剪切试验的预应力锚杆变形性能分析

张 伟1,刘泉声2   

  1. 1.山东电力工程咨询院有限公司,济南 250013; 2.中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点实验室,武汉 430071
  • 收稿日期:2013-12-17 出版日期:2014-08-12 发布日期:2014-08-14
  • 作者简介:张伟,男,1982年生,博士,工程师,主要从事电力工程的勘察和基础稳定性方面的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:

    中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目“煤矿深井巷道围岩稳定性分析与控制理论研究”(No. kzcx2-yw-152);国家自然科学基金重点项目“西部高地应力结构性流变岩体的破坏机制及锚固可靠性研究”(No. 90510019)。

Analysis of deformation characteristics of prestressed anchor bolt based on shear test

ZHANG Wei1, LIU Quan-sheng2   

  1. 1. Shandong Electric Power Engineering Consulting Institute Co. Ltd., Jinan 250013, China; 2. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan 430071, China
  • Received:2013-12-17 Online:2014-08-12 Published:2014-08-14

摘要: 为了研究锚杆对节理剪切性能的作用机制和模式,开展了锚固节理岩体的实验室剪切试验,模拟了不同强度的岩体在剪力作用下的变形和受力特征,对比了锚杆加固前、后岩体的剪切变形规律,分析了节理岩体强度、预应力及锚固方式对节理的抗剪能力的影响,试验过程中通过应变片测点监测锚杆轴力的变化规律,研究了节理剪切过程中锚杆的轴向受力机制和变形特性。剪切试验完成后,取出剪切变形后的锚杆,统计了变形段长度与各参数之间的关系。通过试验结果分析,剪力-位移曲线存在明显的3个阶段:弹性阶段、屈服阶段和塑性强化阶段,曲线近似呈现双直线特征,弹性段锚杆主要发挥销钉作用;屈服段锚杆的轴向作用开始调动,锚杆同时存在销钉和约束作用;塑性段锚杆不再发挥销钉作用,只是依靠其轴向约束作用限制岩体的变形;曲线表现出韧性增强的剪切性能,这就使得锚杆锚固节理岩体的破坏特性由脆性转变为塑性,从而提高了岩体的稳定性和安全度。节理面的滑动对锚杆产生剪切作用,由于切向变形而产生了附加的锚杆轴向变形,锚杆的轴向应力随着剪切位移的增大呈增长的趋势,变形剧烈区域集中于节理面附近,且距离节理面越近其轴向应力增大越多。

关键词: 预应力锚杆, 节理岩体, 剪切试验, 变形特性

Abstract: The shear tests of bolted jointed rock mass were carried out in the laboratory to study the mechanical behaviors of anchor bolt in the jointed rock mass. In the experiment, rock mass of different strength, anchorage mode and prestress were simulated, meanwhile, the deformation characteristics of anchor bolts were monitored to compare the shear deformation regularity before and after bolting and to analyse the influences of prestress, rock strength, anchorage mode on shear capacity of jointed rock mass. Change of axial force was monitored through the strain gauge to study the axial deformation mechanism and force characteristics of anchor bolts. The distorted anchor bolts were taken out to analyse the relationship between the deformation length and other parameters after shearing test. Several conclusions were derived from the results of above tests: Shear stress vs. displacement curves can be divided into three stages: elastic stage, yield stage and plastic hardening stage, and show a feature of approximate double-linear lines. In elastic stage, the bolts act as “pin”. In yield stage, the axial effect was activated and bolts functioned as both pin and confinement effect. In plastic stage, the bolts did not take the effect of pin, and just restricted the deformation of rock though its axial confinement effect. Shear load vs. displacement curves presented as plastic hardening mode, which means that the toughness of bolted jointed rock mass will be enhanced; and the failure mode changes from fracture mode into yield mode. So that the stability and safety of bolted jointed rock mass were improved. The bolt was sheared as a result of slippage of the joint and was led to additional axial deformation due to lateral deformation, the axial stress increased with the shear displacement. The region of distortion of the bolt concentrated nearby the joint surface and the closer to the joint surface, the more the augment of the axial stress was.

Key words: prestressed anchor bolt, jointed rock mass, shear test, deformation characteristic

中图分类号: 

  • TU 457
[1] 闫超萍, 龙志林, 周益春, 旷杜敏, 陈佳敏, . 钙质砂剪切特性的围压效应和粒径效应研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 581-591.
[2] 王培涛, 黄正均, 任奋华, 章亮, 蔡美峰, . 基于3D打印的含复杂节理岩石直剪特性 及破坏机制研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 46-56.
[3] 何鹏飞, 马巍, 穆彦虎, 黄永庭, 董建华, . 黄土−砂浆块界面剪切特性试验及本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 82-90.
[4] 李志成, 冯先导, 沈立龙, . 沉管隧道含垄沟卵石垫层变形特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 189-194.
[5] 郭院成, 李明宇, 张艳伟, . 预应力锚杆复合土钉墙支护体系增量解析方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(S1): 253-258.
[6] 胡田飞, 刘建坤, 王天亮, 岳祖润, . 粉质黏土变形特性的冻融循环效应及其双屈 服面本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 987-997.
[7] 张小燕, 蔡燕燕, 周浩燃, 杨 洋, 李玉龙, . 珊瑚砂大剪切应变下的剪切特性和分形维数[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 610-615.
[8] 柯志强, 王环玲, 徐卫亚, 林志南, 吉 华, . 含横向节理的柱状节理岩体力学特性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 660-667.
[9] 孙钱程, 郑民总, 李邵军, 郭浩森, 程 远, 裴书锋, 江 权, . 柱状节理岩体隧洞松弛深度的 变异特性与确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 728-736.
[10] 崔凯, 冯飞, 谌文武, 汪小海, 程富强, . 生石灰为掺料的土遗址裂隙注浆浆液结石体 力学兼容性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4627-4636.
[11] 王小伟, 朱杰兵, 李聪, . pH和O2协同作用下预应力锚杆 腐蚀损伤行为试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(11): 4306-4312.
[12] 王本鑫, 金爱兵, 赵怡晴, 王贺, 孙浩, 刘佳伟, 魏余栋, . 基于CT扫描的含非贯通节理3D打印试件 破裂规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3920-3927.
[13] 孔纲强, 文磊, 刘汉龙, 王成青, . 植物根系分布形态及含根复合土强度特性试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3717-3723.
[14] 王道远, 袁金秀, 朱永全, 刘佳, 王洪凡, . 硬塑-流塑浅埋黄土隧道变形特性及合理预留 变形量模型试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3813-3822.
[15] 张 磊, 刘 慧, 王铁行. 固结与不固结条件下黄土-混凝土接触面剪切试验[J]. 岩土力学, 2018, 39(S2): 238-244.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 刘小文,常立君,胡小荣. 非饱和红土基质吸力与含水率及密度关系试验研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3302 -3306 .
[2] 黄建华,宋二祥. 大型锚碇基础围护工程冻结帷幕力学性态研究[J]. , 2009, 30(11): 3372 -3378 .
[3] 王观石,李长洪,陈保君,李世海. 应力波在非线性结构面介质中的传播规律[J]. , 2009, 30(12): 3747 -3752 .
[4] 王朝阳,许 强,倪万魁. 原状黄土CT试验中应力-应变关系的研究[J]. , 2010, 31(2): 387 -391 .
[5] 刘远明,夏才初. 直剪条件下非贯通节理岩体岩桥力学性质弱化机制及贯通模型初步研究[J]. , 2010, 31(3): 695 -701 .
[6] 邓 琴,郭明伟,李春光,葛修润. 基于边界元法的边坡矢量和稳定分析[J]. , 2010, 31(6): 1971 -1976 .
[7] 万少石,年廷凯,蒋景彩,栾茂田. 边坡稳定强度折减有限元分析中的若干问题讨论[J]. , 2010, 31(7): 2283 -2288 .
[8] 闫 铁,李 玮,毕雪亮. 基于分形方法的多孔介质有效应力模型研究[J]. , 2010, 31(8): 2625 -2629 .
[9] 赵尚毅,郑颖人,李安洪,邱文平,唐晓松,徐 俊. 多排埋入式抗滑桩在武隆县政府滑坡中的应用[J]. , 2009, 30(S1): 160 -164 .
[10] 赵跃堂,林家炜,石 磊. 冲击荷载作用下层裂问题研究[J]. , 2011, 32(S2): 122 -126 .