双向压缩条件下闭合裂隙岩体断裂破坏机制及渗透压环境判定准则

doi:10.16285/j.rsm.2015.01.007

›› 2015, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1): 56-60.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2015.01.007

双向压缩条件下闭合裂隙岩体断裂破坏机制及渗透压环境判定准则

蒲成志^{1, 2}，曹平²，张春阳^{2, 3}，付宗智^{2, 4}

1. 南华大学核资源工程学院，湖南衡阳 421001；2. 中南大学资源与安全工程学院，湖南长沙 410083； 3. 武汉理工大学资源与环境工程学院，武汉 430070；4. 长沙有色冶金设计研究院有限公司，湖南长沙 411201

收稿日期:2013-09-22 出版日期:2015-01-12 发布日期:2018-06-13
作者简介:蒲成志，男，1986年生，博士，讲师，主要从事工程断裂力学与岩土工程方面的研究工作。
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金资助项目(No. 51174228)；湖南省博士生科研创新项目(No. CX2012B072)。

Fracture failure mechanism of rock with closed crack and judging criterion of seepage pressure under biaxial compression

PU Cheng-zhi^{1, 2}，CAO Ping²，ZHANG Chun-yang^{2, 3}，FU Zong-zhi^{2, 4}

1. School of Nuclear Resources Engineering, University of South China, Hengyang, Hunan 421001, China; 2. School of Resources and Safety Engineering, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan 410083, China; 3. School of Resources and Environment Engineering, Wuhan University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430070, China; 4. Changsha Engineering & Research Institute Ltd. of Nonferrous Metallurgy, Changsha, Hunan 411201, China

Received:2013-09-22 Online:2015-01-12 Published:2018-06-13

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在研究双向压缩条件下压剪复合型裂纹应力分布特征及断裂破坏机制基础上，考虑渗透压对初始裂隙面上有效正应力的影响，提出高低渗透压环境的判定准则，并基于滑动裂纹模型理论及最大周向拉应力破坏准则，得到不同渗透压环境下初始裂隙尖端微裂纹起裂特征与规律。研究结果表明：压剪复合应力条件下，初始裂隙尖端发育微裂纹的最优倾角与裂隙面摩擦系数直接相关，随裂隙面摩擦系数的增大，最优初始裂隙倾角由45°起逐渐增大；低渗透压条件下，渗流场的存在使裂纹面摩擦系数发生弱化，进而使得最优初始裂隙倾角向45°靠近，而渗透压直接降低裂隙面上有效正应力且与裂隙倾角无关，其仅仅影响裂隙体材料的初裂强度；高渗透压条件下，初始裂隙面由压剪复合应力状态转化为拉剪复合应力状态，并在拉剪复合应力场作用下，尖端微裂纹起裂角随KI/KII的不断增大，由70.5°逐渐趋近于0°。

关键词: 渗透压, 初始裂隙面摩擦系数, 最优初始裂隙倾角, 起裂角, 软化系数

Abstract: On the basis of the fracture failure mechanism and stress distribution characteristics of compressive-shear rock cracks under biaxial compression, this paper theoretically examines the influence of seepage pressure on the effective normal stress of preexisting crack surface. Then, a judging criterion is proposed for determining whether the seepage pressure is higher or lower. It considers the stress state of the effective normal stress of preexisting crack surface. Finally, the cracking law and characteristic of microcracks, generated at the tips of preexisting crack with different seepage pressures, are studied using the maximum circumferential stress criterion and sliding crack model. The results show that the optimal inclination angle of preexisting crack (on which the initial cracking strength of fissure body is the minimum) is directly related to the frictional coefficient of preexisting crack surface under biaxial compression. The optimal inclination angle of preexisting crack increases from 45° with the increasing of frictional coefficient of preexisting crack surface. When the seepage pressure is lower, the frictional coefficient of preexisting crack surface is weakened because of presence of seepage field. Furthermore, the optimal inclination angle of preexisting crack is close to 45°. On the other hand, the seepage pressure directly is applied to the surface of preexisting crack. Therefore, it just influences the initial cracking strength of fissure body. When the seepage pressure is higher, the stress state changes from compression-shear to tension-shear on the surface of preexisting crack. Because of the action of tensile stress, the initial cracking angle of microcrack generating at the tip of preexisting crack increases from 70.5° to 0° with the increasing of the value of KI /KII.

Key words: seepage pressure, frictional coefficient of preexisting crack surface, optimal inclination angle of preexisting crack, initial cracking angle, softening coefficient

中图分类号:

TU 452

蒲成志，曹平，张春阳，付宗智 , . 双向压缩条件下闭合裂隙岩体断裂破坏机制及渗透压环境判定准则[J]. , 2015, 36(1): 56-60.

PU Cheng-zhi ，CAO Ping ，ZHANG Chun-yang ，FU Zong-zhi , . Fracture failure mechanism of rock with closed crack and judging criterion of seepage pressure under biaxial compression[J]. , 2015, 36(1): 56-60.

参考文献

相关文章 14

[1]	杨德欢, 颜荣涛, 韦昌富, 潘雪瑛, 张芹, . 饱和黏土平均粒间应力的确定方法[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2075-2084.
[2]	宋战平, 程昀, 杨腾添, 霍润科, 王军保, 刘新荣, . 渗透压作用对灰岩孔隙结构演化规律影响的试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4607-4619.
[3]	周科平, 刘维, 周彦龙, 林允, 薛轲. 不同渗透力的类充填体力学特性及损伤软化本构模型研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 3724-3732.
[4]	左宇军，孙文吉斌，邬忠虎，许云飞,. 渗透压–应力耦合作用下页岩渗透性试验[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3253-3260.
[5]	王刚，王锐，武猛猛，王鹏飞，周煜明,. 渗透压-应力耦合作用下煤体常规三轴试验的颗粒流模拟[J]. , 2016, 37(S1): 537-546.
[6]	杨德欢，颜荣涛，韦昌富，张敏，张芹，. 粉质黏土强度指标的水化学敏感性研究[J]. , 2016, 37(12): 3529-3536.
[7]	崔岚，郑俊杰，章荣军，张威. 弹塑性软化模型下隧洞围岩变形与支护压力分析[J]. , 2014, 35(3): 717-722.
[8]	陈小平. 重庆沙溪庙组地层岩石单轴抗压强度研究[J]. , 2014, 35(10): 2994-2999.
[9]	邓华锋，朱敏，李建林，王宇，罗骞，原先凡. 砂岩Ⅰ型断裂韧度及其与强度参数的相关性研究[J]. , 2012, 33(12): 3585-3591.
[10]	王刚，李术才，王明斌. 渗透压力作用下加锚裂隙岩体围岩稳定性研究[J]. , 2009, 30(9): 2843-2849.
[11]	王刚，蒋宇静，王渭明，李廷春. 新型数控岩石节理剪切渗流试验台的设计与应用[J]. , 2009, 30(10): 3200-3209.
[12]	范书立，陈健云，林皋. 渗透压力对重力坝有限元分析的影响研究[J]. , 2007, 28(S1): 575-580.
[13]	王环玲，徐卫亚，杨圣奇. 岩石变形破坏过程中渗透率演化规律的试验研究[J]. , 2006, 27(10): 1703-1708.
[14]	郑少河，姚海林，葛修润 , . 渗透压力对裂隙岩体损伤破坏的研究[J]. , 2002, 23(6): 687-690.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

双向压缩条件下闭合裂隙岩体断裂破坏机制及渗透压环境判定准则

Fracture failure mechanism of rock with closed crack and judging criterion of seepage pressure under biaxial compression

PDF (Chinese)

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 14

Metrics

本文评价

推荐阅读 10