›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 49-60.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2017.01.007

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同先期固结压力下的错动带力学特性研究

段淑倩1,冯夏庭1,江 权1,徐鼎平1,徐 鸿2   

  1. 1. 中国科学院武汉岩土力学研究所 岩土力学与工程国家重点试验室,湖北 武汉 430071; 2. 东北大学 深部金属矿山安全开采研究中心,辽宁 沈阳 110819
  • 收稿日期:2015-01-19 出版日期:2017-01-11 发布日期:2018-06-05
  • 作者简介:段淑倩,女,1991年生,博士研究生,主要从事岩土力学与工程方面的研究。
  • 基金资助:

    国家自然科学基金国际合作重大项目(No. 41320104005);国家自然科学基金重点项目(No. 11232024);国家自然科学青年基金(No. 51309219)。

Mechanical characteristics of interlayer staggered zones under different preconsolidation pressures

DUAN Shu-qian1, FENG Xia-ting1, JIANG Quan1, XU Ding-ping1, XU Hong2   

  1. 1. State Key Laboratory of Geomechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Institute of Rock and Soil Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Wuhan, Hubei 430071, China; 2. Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education on Safe Mining of Deep Metal Mines, Northeastern University, Shenyang, Liaoning 110819,China
  • Received:2015-01-19 Online:2017-01-11 Published:2018-06-05
  • Supported by:

    This work was supported by NSFC Projects of International Cooperation and Exchanges (41320104005), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) and the Young Foundation of the National Natural Science of China (51309219).

摘要: 针对白鹤滩大型水电站揭露的错动带,探索了一种反映原岩应力状态的错动带试样制备方法,采用替代法对错动带进行超粒径处理,同时控制先期固结压力和稳压时间进行静载固结,并基于不同先期固结压力、不同高围压下的不固结、不排水三轴试验,结合矿物成分分析试验和扫描电镜试验,分析了不同先期固结压力下错动带的力学和变形特性。试验结果表明,不同高围压、不同固结压力下错动带应力-应变关系曲线基本表现为有剪胀行为的应变硬化型力学行为,且多为腰鼓型塑性破坏;在相同固结压力条件下,随着围压升高,错动带试样破坏应力、变形模量和泊松比均呈增大趋势,扩容效应更明显;相同围压条件下,随着先期固结压力的增大,错动带破坏应力逐步提高,弹性模量逐渐增大,而泊松比略有减小,敏感性不大;同时黏聚力和内摩擦角随固结压力的增加而分别减小和增大,呈劣化趋势。错动带微观结构的定性和定量分析进一步揭示了错动带作为一种夹杂错动后残留有岩石碎屑(块)软弱物质的颗粒类材料,在高应力下其塑性变形主要来源于颗粒破碎和颗粒的定向排列。因此,先期固结压力是影响错动带性质的重要因素。

关键词: 错动带, 先期固结压力, 颗粒破碎

Abstract: For interlayer staggered zones revealed in Baihetan large-scale hydropower station, a preparation method of reconstituted specimens is explored to reflect in-situ stress of these zones with an alternative method of super particle processing. Meanwhile, the pre-consolidation pressure and consolidation time are controlled by the static loading. Based on unconsolidated and undrained triaxial tests on reconstituted specimens from the interlayer staggered zone under either different pre-consolidation pressures or different high confining pressures, in combination with tests of mineral composition analysis and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The mechanical deformation characteristics of interlayer staggered zones under different pre-consolidation pressures are discussed in detail. Under different confining and pre-consolidation pressures, deviatoric stress-axial strain curves of interlayer staggered zones reconstituted specimens exhibit strain hardening, and the plastic failure shows as the waist-drum shape. Under the same pre-consolidation pressure conditions, the failure stress, deformation modulus and Poisson’s ratio increase with the increase of confining pressure, and the expansion effect is highly obvious. However, under the same confining pressure, the failure stress, deformation modulus and Poisson’s ratio gradually increase with the increase of pre-consolidation pressure, while the Poisson’s ratio decreases slightly. The cohesion decreases and the internal friction angle increases respectively, with consolidation pressure enhancing. The qualitative and quantitative microstructure analysis further reveal that the plastic deformation of the interlayer staggered zone, as rock materials containning fragments, mainly resulted from particle breakage and directional arrangement under high stress. Therefore, the pre-consolidation pressure is an important factor affecting the characteristics of the interlayer staggered zone.

Key words: interlayer staggered zone, pre-consolidation pressure, particle crushing

中图分类号: 

  • TU 452

[1] 褚福永, 朱俊高, 翁厚洋, 叶洋帆. 粗粒料级配缩尺后最大干密度试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1599-1604.
[2] 李小刚, 朱长歧, 崔翔, 张珀瑜, 王睿, . 含碳酸盐混合砂的三轴剪切试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(1): 123-131.
[3] 韩钢, 周辉, 陈建林, 张传庆, 高阳, 宋桂红, 洪望兵, . 白鹤滩水电站层间错动带工程地质特性[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(9): 3559-3568.
[4] 张凌凯, 王睿, 张建民, 唐新军, . 考虑颗粒破碎效应的堆石料静动力本构模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2547-2554.
[5] 彭宇, 丁选明, 肖杨, 楚剑, 邓玮婷, . 基于染色标定与图像颗粒分割的 钙质砂颗粒破碎特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(7): 2663-2672.
[6] 孔宪京, 宁凡伟, 刘京茂, 邹德高, 周晨光, . 应力路径和干湿状态对堆石料颗粒破碎的影响研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(6): 2059-2065.
[7] 丁建源, 陈晓斌, 张家生, 刘怡吟, 肖源杰, . 基于对数几率回归模型的粗颗粒土颗粒 破碎过程演化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(4): 1465-1473.
[8] 郭万里, 朱俊高, 钱 彬, 张 丹, . 粗粒土的颗粒破碎演化模型及其试验验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1023-1029.
[9] 裴向军, 朱 凌, 崔圣华, 张晓超, 梁玉飞, 高会会, 张子东. 大光包滑坡层间错动带液化特性及 滑坡启动成因探讨[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(3): 1085-1096.
[10] 张小燕, 蔡燕燕, 周浩燃, 杨 洋, 李玉龙, . 珊瑚砂大剪切应变下的剪切特性和分形维数[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(2): 610-615.
[11] 郭万里, 蔡正银, 武颖利, 黄英豪. 粗粒土的颗粒破碎耗能及剪胀方程研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(12): 4703-4710.
[12] 刘健, 朱赵辉, 吴浩, 张石磊, 王晋明, . 超大型地下洞室高边墙围岩变形影响特性研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2019, 40(10): 4030-4040.
[13] 纪文栋,张宇亭,王 洋,裴文斌, . 循环单剪下珊瑚钙质砂和普通硅质砂剪切特性对比研究[J]. , 2018, 39(S1): 282-288.
[14] 王新志,翁贻令,王 星,陈伟俊, . 钙质土颗粒咬合作用机制[J]. , 2018, 39(9): 3113-3120.
[15] 黄宏翔,陈育民,王建平,刘汉龙,周晓智,霍正格, . 钙质砂抗剪强度特性的环剪试验[J]. , 2018, 39(6): 2082-2088.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!