岩土力学 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (5): 1761-1770.doi: 10.16285/j.rsm.2018.0857

• 基础理论与实验研究 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同初始孔隙比下非饱和黏土渗透性 试验研究及模型预测

陶高梁1,吴小康1,甘世朝2,肖衡林1,马 强1,罗晨晨1   

  1. 1. 湖北工业大学 土木建筑与环境学院,湖北 武汉 430068;2. 武汉建工集团股份有限公司,湖北 武汉 430056
  • 收稿日期:2018-05-14 出版日期:2019-05-11 发布日期:2019-06-02
  • 通讯作者: 肖衡林,男,1977年生,博士,教授,主要从事生态与环境岩土工程、地下工程结构稳定、光纤的岩土工程监测技术等方面的研究工作。E-mail:xiao-henglin@163.com E-mail: tgl1979@126.com
  • 作者简介:陶高梁,男,1979年生,博士,副教授,主要从事土体孔隙结构及非饱和土的研究工作。
  • 基金资助:
    湖北省教育厅科研计划项目(No. D20161405)及优秀中青年科技创新团队项目(No. T201605)。

Experimental study and model prediction of permeability coefficient of unsaturated clay with different initial void ratios

TAO Gao-liang1, WU Xiao-kang1, GAN Shi-chao2, XIAO Heng-lin1, MA Qiang1, LUO Chen-chen1   

  1. 1. School of Civil, Architectural and Environmental Engineering, Hubei University of Technology, Wuhan, Hubei 430068, China; 2. Wuhan Construction Engineering Co. Ltd., Wuhan, Hubei 430056, China
  • Received:2018-05-14 Online:2019-05-11 Published:2019-06-02
  • Supported by:
    This work was supported by the Research Project of Hubei Provincial Education Department (D20161405) and the Outstanding Young and Middle-aged Scientific and Technological Innovation Team Project of Hubei Provincial Education Department (T201605).

摘要: 不同初始孔隙比下非饱和土渗透系数的试验测量及预测,是进行非饱和土渗流分析及水-力耦合研究的基础,相关工作具有重要的意义。以湖南邵阳红黏土为例,利用千斤顶制备5种不同初始孔隙密度塑土样;采用压力板仪测量其土-水特征曲线;选用变水头法测量其饱和渗透系数;自制有机玻璃桶试验装置,采用瞬态剖面法进行非饱和渗透试验,测量不同初始孔隙比土样的非饱和渗透系数。选用CCG(Childs和Collis-George)修正模型和陶-孔模型预测非饱和渗透系数,并与实测值进行比较,验证模型有效性。以上述试验及模型预测的成果为基础,研究初始孔隙比对非饱和(相对)渗透系数的影响规律。研究结果表明:湖南非饱和黏性土渗透系数随基质吸力增加而降低,在低基质吸力阶段(100 kPa以内)变化较为剧烈,在高基质吸力阶段(100 kPa以上)变化较为缓慢;CCG模型预测误差较大,陶-孔模型预测值与实测值总体吻合较好;进气值之后,初始孔隙比对非饱和渗透系数的影响较小,对非饱和相对渗透系数的影响较大,相同基质吸力条件下初始孔隙比越小,相对渗透系数越大。

关键词: 非饱和土, 土-水特征曲线, 瞬态剖面法, 渗透系数

Abstract: The measurement and prediction of permeability coefficient of unsaturated soils with different initial void ratios are the basis of seepage analysis and hydro-mechanical coupling study of unsaturated soils, so corresponding work has great significance. As an example, Hunan red clay was chosen to prepare remoulded samples of five different initial void ratios by using jack. Then, the soil-water characteristic curve was measured by using pressure plate apparatus. Afterward, the saturated permeability coefficient was measured by variable head method, while the unsaturated permeability coefficients with different initial void ratios were obtained by instantaneous profile method using a self-made plexiglass barrel device. CCG (Childs and Collis-George) correction model and Tao-Kong model were selected to predict the unsaturated permeability coefficients, and their effectiveness was demonstrated through comparing the prediction values with the measured values. On the basis of experimental results and model prediction values, the influence of initial void ratio on unsaturated (relative) permeability coefficient was examined. The results show that the permeability coefficient of unsaturated Hunan clay decreases with the increase of matric suction in a double logarithmic coordinate, which presents a larger slope in low matric suction stage within 100 kPa while a smaller slope in high suction stage above 100 kPa. The predictions of Tao-Kong model are in good agreement with the measured values, yet great predicted errors exist in the results by the CCG model. For the suction stage larger than air entry value, the initial void ratio has little influence on the unsaturated permeability coefficient and has a greater influence on the unsaturated relative permeability coefficient. In the condition of same matric suction, a smaller initial void ratio results a greater relative permeability coefficient.

Key words: unsaturated soils, soil-water characteristic curve, instantaneous profile method, permeability coefficient

中图分类号: 

  • TU 411
[1] 桂跃, 吴承坤, 赵振兴, 刘声钧, 刘锐, 张秋敏. 微生物分解有机质作用对泥炭土工程性质的影响[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(S1): 147-155.
[2] 杨志浩, 岳祖润, 冯怀平, . 非饱和粉土路基内水分迁移规律试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2241-2251.
[3] 陈昊, 胡小荣. 非饱和土三剪强度准则及验证[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(7): 2380-2388.
[4] 文伟, 赖远明, 尤哲敏, 李积锋, . 基于Pitzer离子模型的盐渍非饱和土孔隙 相对湿度计算[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 1944-1952.
[5] 陶帅, 董毅, 韦昌富, . 环境湿度可控的土体小应变刚度试验系统[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(6): 2132-2142.
[6] 谌文武, 贾全全, 童艳梅. 莫高窟壁画地仗土-水特征曲线的测定与拟合[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1483-1491.
[7] 柳鸿博, 周凤玺, 岳国栋, 郝磊超. 非饱和土中热弹性波的传播特性分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1613-1624.
[8] 薛阳, 吴益平, 苗发盛, 李麟玮, 廖康, 张龙飞. 库水升降条件下考虑饱和渗透系数空间变异性的白水河滑坡渗流变形分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(5): 1709-1720.
[9] 孙银磊, 汤连生, 刘洁, . 非饱和土微观结构与粒间吸力的研究进展[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1095-1122.
[10] 李潇旋, 李涛, 李舰, 张涛. 循环荷载下非饱和结构性黏土的弹塑性双面模型[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(4): 1153-1160.
[11] 范日东, 杜延军, 刘松玉, 杨玉玲, . 无机盐溶液作用下砂−膨润土竖向隔离屏障 材料化学相容性试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 736-746.
[12] 李华, 李同录, 江睿君, 范江文. 基于滤纸法的非饱和渗透性曲线测试[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 895-904.
[13] 盛建龙, 韩云飞, 叶祖洋, 程爱平, 黄诗冰, . 粗糙裂隙水、气两相流相对渗透系数模型与数值分析[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(3): 1048-1055.
[14] 陈仁朋, 王朋飞, 刘鹏, 程威, 康馨, 杨微, . 路基煤矸石填料土-水特征曲线试验研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 372-378.
[15] 李红坡, 陈征, 冯健雪, 蒙宇涵, 梅国雄, . 双层地基水平排水砂垫层位置优化研究[J]. 岩土力学, 2020, 41(2): 437-444.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!